H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo vs Jiri Vanek H2H: 0-1

Jiri Vanek holds a 1–0 lead over Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jiri Vanek leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jiri Vanek won the 2006 Casablanca round of 32 5-7 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo
ESP Age 48 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Jiri Vanek
CZE Age 48 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jiri Vanek #101 5-7 6-1 6-4 Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo #93 Match data Apr 27, 2006* R32 Casablanca ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo #1,153 #50 826 1,704 68 133 33.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jiri Vanek #1,543 #74 796 1,646 68 122 35.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo Jiri Vanek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1995 1–1 50.0% #495 1,506 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2000 12–13 48.0% #77 1,591 0 0
23 2001 1–1 50.0% #154 1,491 0 0 2001 11–22 33.3% #102 1,534 0 0
24 2002 0–3 0.0% #141 1,496 0 0 2002 2–4 33.3% #199 1,532 0 0
25 2003 5–11 31.2% #80 1,477 0 0 2003 7–9 43.8% #143 1,545 0 0
26 2004 7–19 26.9% #130 1,448 0 0 2004 4–7 36.4% #115 1,533 0 0
27 2005 5–5 50.0% #120 1,499 0 0 2005 7–18 28.0% #99 1,500 0 0
28 2006 25–20 55.6% #57 1,665 0 0 2006 10–17 37.0% #102 1,552 0 0
29 2007 9–18 33.3% #133 1,546 0 0 2007 7–13 35.0% #101 1,578 0 0
30 2008 1–6 14.3% #121 1,569 0 0 2008 7–16 30.4% #124 1,563 0 0
31 2009 4–10 28.6% #156 1,584 0 0 2009 0–2 0.0% #175 1,577 0 0
32 2010 1–4 20.0% #77 1,571 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2011 5–15 25.0% #130 1,532 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2012 3–12 20.0% #91 1,571 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2013 2–6 25.0% #166 1,567 0 0 — — — — — — —
36 2014 0–3 0.0% #224 1,620 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo Jiri Vanek
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 4 6 10 40.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2001 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2001 3 9 12 25.0% 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2002 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2003 0 2 2 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 3 5 8 37.5% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2004 0 5 5 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2004 1 1 2 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2005 — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 1 3 4 25.0% 5 11 16 31.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 2006 3 4 7 42.9% 22 14 36 61.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 1 3 4 25.0% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2007 1 5 6 16.7% 8 12 20 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 2 5 7 28.6% 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2008 — — — — 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — — 2008 1 6 7 14.3% 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2011 1 4 5 20.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 2 2 4 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 7 29 36 19.4% 61 94 155 39.4% 0 8 8 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — 18 42 60 30.0% 48 66 114 42.1% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 7 8 12.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 192/196 of Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo's and 180/190 of Jiri Vanek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo Jiri Vanek
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 2/2 2.5 2.0 43.3% 49.4% 41.6% 39.2% 61.4% 44.6% 46.6%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 22/25 6.0 3.5 55.1% 69.7% 47.3% 55.9% 43.2% 59.7% 36.5%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 29/33 5.4 2.2 54.5% 69.6% 45.8% 54.7% 42.3% 58.4% 36.3%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 5/6 5.4 1.6 56.8% 70.1% 51.4% 61.4% 54.2% 62.0% 33.9%
25 2003 16/16 4.5 3.1 60.8% 67.7% 46.4% 48.6% 50.7% 59.1% 39.0% 2003 16/16 7.2 2.5 56.4% 71.8% 48.8% 56.9% 51.0% 61.8% 35.2%
26 2004 25/26 2.2 3.6 57.9% 66.1% 46.0% 58.2% 34.5% 57.6% 33.6% 2004 11/11 5.5 3.0 57.3% 69.9% 43.5% 65.1% 34.7% 58.5% 36.3%
27 2005 10/10 1.8 1.6 61.2% 66.2% 52.9% 44.7% 42.7% 61.5% 38.1% 2005 25/25 7.3 3.4 60.4% 69.7% 42.7% 57.6% 34.8% 58.9% 33.4%
28 2006 44/45 4.2 2.4 59.1% 70.0% 46.7% 56.8% 45.3% 60.5% 38.8% 2006 27/27 4.4 3.2 65.9% 65.9% 42.1% 57.7% 46.3% 57.8% 37.9%
29 2007 25/27 2.9 4.9 55.2% 65.2% 43.6% 52.4% 60.3% 55.5% 38.3% 2007 20/20 5.8 2.7 61.0% 69.1% 44.6% 52.0% 44.1% 59.5% 33.2%
30 2008 7/7 1.7 4.6 53.1% 66.9% 43.3% 51.5% 40.4% 55.7% 39.0% 2008 21/23 6.0 3.2 58.6% 67.1% 43.2% 57.4% 44.1% 57.2% 33.6%
31 2009 14/14 2.4 5.1 55.3% 67.0% 45.5% 62.4% 38.6% 57.2% 36.2% 2009 2/2 4.0 6.5 52.9% 63.0% 36.1% 58.0% 25.0% 50.6% 18.6%
32 2010 5/5 3.4 3.2 58.2% 68.7% 41.4% 48.3% 29.2% 57.3% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2011 20/20 2.5 4.4 55.9% 63.8% 44.8% 53.5% 47.8% 55.3% 35.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 15/15 2.7 5.2 53.7% 66.8% 46.2% 49.3% 37.1% 57.2% 35.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 8/8 4.3 4.1 53.9% 71.8% 47.5% 61.8% 36.2% 60.3% 34.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 3/3 0.7 3.7 50.9% 60.3% 45.5% 47.8% 47.2% 53.6% 34.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 192/201 3.1 3.7 57.1% 67.1% 45.9% 54.2% 44.4% 58.0% 36.8% — 180/190 5.8 3.0 58.6% 68.6% 44.7% 56.6% 43.0% 58.7% 35.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo Jiri Vanek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1506 98.4 -2.42 +0.35 0.841 45.6% — — — 40.0% -1.20 1–0 — — +0.19
22 2000 1482 94.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1592 125.0 -1.75 -0.49 0.907 48.7% -27 +29 — 45.6% -0.15 5–5 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — +0.43
23 2001 1492 104.2 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.09 2001 1534 129.4 -2.36 -1.10 0.873 47.5% -15 +85 — 39.0% -0.76 2–7 (22%) 7–10 (41%) — -1.01
24 2002 1497 110.2 — — — — — +38 — 25.0% -2.12 0–2 — — -0.52 2002 1533 112.7 +0.13 -0.05 0.893 48.7% -3 — — 40.0% -1.00 1–1 1–0 — +0.05
25 2003 1478 114.0 -1.75 -0.48 0.954 48.8% -2 +54 — 40.5% -0.76 2–6 (25%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.83 2003 1546 123.4 -0.16 -1.98 0.920 48.6% -35 +88 — 44.7% -0.53 2–3 (40%) 7–2 (78%) — -0.28
26 2004 1448 112.1 -4.06 -3.50 0.792 46.1% -24 +58 — 33.8% -1.28 2–5 (29%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.77 2004 1534 107.9 -1.90 -0.97 0.873 47.3% -3 +73 — 41.4% -0.90 3–4 (43%) 3–0 (100%) — +0.51
27 2005 1500 117.9 -0.46 -0.04 0.991 49.6% — +55 — 50.0% +0.05 — 1–0 — -0.16 2005 1501 112.6 -2.39 -3.28 0.814 46.3% -3 +44 — 30.2% -1.19 5–4 (56%) 4–12 (25%) — -0.01
28 2006 1665 136.3 -0.89 +0.15 0.983 50.1% -205 +93 — 51.8% -0.01 10–6 (63%) 10–8 (56%) — -0.23 2006 1552 124.5 -2.92 -0.30 0.898 48.0% -20 +4 -48 41.5% -0.51 1–6 (14%) 6–7 (46%) — +0.18
29 2007 1546 122.6 -4.46 +0.12 0.860 47.2% -108 +96 — 38.8% -0.85 1–5 (17%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.16 2007 1578 121.4 -2.67 -1.97 0.819 46.9% -83 +67 — 36.2% -1.04 3–4 (43%) 4–3 (57%) — +0.50
30 2008 1570 121.0 -2.71 +1.08 0.881 47.6% — +67 — 33.3% -0.87 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — -0.05 2008 1564 117.1 -3.67 -2.26 0.786 46.0% -66 +59 — 35.9% -1.23 4–5 (44%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.23
31 2009 1585 117.3 -3.43 -1.01 0.847 47.1% -183 +83 — 33.3% -1.15 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.21 2009 1577 111.7 -3.01 +0.23 0.377 37.8% — — — 0.0% -3.60 — — — -0.30
32 2010 1571 118.8 -1.59 -2.39 0.781 46.7% — +106 — 18.2% -1.27 — 0–2 — -0.10 2010 1548 99.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2011 1532 118.2 -5.08 -1.56 0.798 46.2% -132 +68 — 31.4% -1.35 2–4 (33%) 6–5 (55%) — +0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 1571 127.4 -3.34 -2.07 0.818 46.7% -103 +25 -145 27.5% -1.02 1–4 (20%) 0–4 (0%) — +0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 1568 119.9 -1.67 -1.61 0.864 47.7% — +36 — 38.9% -0.67 0–2 1–1 — +0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 1620 118.9 -2.17 -1.23 0.744 44.3% — +60 — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 1603 97.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2016 1605 95.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 1528 101.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1705 127.1 -2.77 -0.95 0.877 47.8% -121 +72 -145 38.5% -0.80 19–41 (32%) 29–35 (45%) 92.4 +1.01 — 1647 125.9 -2.28 -1.45 0.854 47.3% -30 +52 -48 38.7% -0.82 27–39 (41%) 41–42 (49%) 100.0 +0.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.