H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo vs Rik De Voest H2H: 0-1
Rik De Voest holds a 1–0 lead over Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rik De Voest leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Rik De Voest won the 2011 Wimbledon first round 6-2 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 48
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 46
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2011* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Rik De Voest | 6-2 6-3 6-2 | Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | #1,153 | #50 | 826 | 1,704 | 68 | 133 | 33.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rik De Voest | #1,088 | #110 | 538 | 1,693 | 19 | 38 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | Rik De Voest | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 23 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #207 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #80 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2004 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #130 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #135 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2005 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2006 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #57 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #159 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #236 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2008 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #121 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2009 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #126 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #77 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2011 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2012 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #91 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2013 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #166 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #224 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |