H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sandy Mayer vs Ray Ruffels H2H: 2-0
Sandy Mayer holds a 2–0 lead over Ray Ruffels in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sandy Mayer leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sandy Mayer won the 1975 Hong Kong third round 9-7 9-8.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 74
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 80
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 1975* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Sandy Mayer | 9-7 9-8 | Ray Ruffels | Match data |
| Apr 18, 1975* | Denver Wct | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Sandy Mayer | 7-5 6-7(4) 6-0 | Ray Ruffels | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sandy Mayer | #508 | #7 | 0 | 2,078 | 372 | 206 | 64.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Ray Ruffels | #482 | #27 | 0 | 1,903 | 246 | 207 | 54.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sandy Mayer | Ray Ruffels | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1970 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1971 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1972 | 13–8 | 61.9% | — | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1973 | 30–13 | 69.8% | #134 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1974 | 29–10 | 74.4% | #55 | 1,854 | 0 | 5 | 1968 | 41–19 | 68.3% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1975 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #28 | 1,907 | 0 | 5 | 1969 | 35–21 | 62.5% | — | 1,760 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1976 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #75 | 1,852 | 0 | 5 | 1970 | 35–22 | 61.4% | — | 1,781 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1977 | 39–14 | 73.6% | #16 | 1,988 | 0 | 8 | 1971 | 32–32 | 50.0% | — | 1,808 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1978 | 41–20 | 67.2% | #17 | 1,931 | 0 | 9 | 1972 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1979 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #44 | 1,897 | 0 | 9 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,773 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1980 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #51 | 1,832 | 0 | 9 | 1974 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #76 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1981 | 43–17 | 71.7% | #14 | 2,041 | 0 | 10 | 1975 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #112 | 1,692 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 1982 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,882 | 0 | 11 | 1976 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #27 | 1,782 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 1983 | 33–17 | 66.0% | #18 | 1,906 | 0 | 12 | 1977 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #96 | 1,699 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 1984 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #117 | 1,793 | 0 | 12 | 1978 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,617 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 1985 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #309 | 1,784 | 0 | 12 | 1979 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #480 | 1,544 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #482 | 1,539 | 0 | 5 |