H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Santiago Giraldo vs Frank Dancevic H2H: 0-1
Frank Dancevic holds a 1–0 lead over Santiago Giraldo in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Frank Dancevic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Frank Dancevic won the 2009 Washington second round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
COL
Age 38
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 41
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2009* | Washington | ATP 500 | R64 | Hard | Frank Dancevic | 6-4 6-3 | Santiago Giraldo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Santiago Giraldo | #1,242 | #28 | 1,230 | 1,929 | 141 | 185 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Frank Dancevic | #406 | #65 | 783 | 1,773 | 54 | 89 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Santiago Giraldo | Frank Dancevic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #434 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2007 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #171 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #163 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #188 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #107 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #88 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #64 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #72 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #55 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #130 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #57 | 1,796 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #143 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 14–24 | 36.8% | #69 | 1,753 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #269 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #32 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #151 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #70 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #165 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2016 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #91 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #122 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2017 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #227 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #253 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #209 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2019 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #274 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #363 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |