H2H data updated: 2026-07-26 01:16 UTC
Simone Bolelli vs Victor Hanescu H2H: 0-1
Victor Hanescu holds a 1–0 lead over Simone Bolelli in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Victor Hanescu leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Victor Hanescu won the 2008 Beijing Olympics second round 7-5 3-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 45
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2008* | Beijing Olympics | Olympics | R64 | Hard | Victor Hanescu | 7-5 3-6 6-4 | Simone Bolelli | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simone Bolelli | #1,391 | #36 | 1,686 | 1,931 | 114 | 157 | 42.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Victor Hanescu | #1,025 | #26 | 1,671 | 1,843 | 187 | 228 | 45.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Simone Bolelli | Victor Hanescu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2006 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #127 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #67 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #70 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #41 | 1,774 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #92 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2009 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #93 | 1,698 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #35 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #107 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #646 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2012 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #84 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #50 | 1,759 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2013 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #245 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 26–30 | 46.4% | #48 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2014 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #55 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2015 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,874 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2016 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #464 | 1,791 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #62 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2017 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #171 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2018 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #141 | 1,788 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #122 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #334 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #279 | 1,654 | 0 | 1 |
| 39 | 2025 | 1–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |