H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Soonwoo Kwon vs Milos Raonic H2H: 1-0
Soonwoo Kwon holds a 1–0 lead over Milos Raonic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Soonwoo Kwon leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Soonwoo Kwon won the 2020 New York fourth round 7-6(4) 6-7(4) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
South Korea
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 35
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2020* | New York | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Soonwoo Kwon | 7-6(4) 6-7(4) 6-4 | Milos Raonic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soonwoo Kwon | #155 | #52 | 1,120 | 1,847 | 56 | 63 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Milos Raonic | #634 | #3 | 5,450 | 2,246 | 369 | 186 | 66.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Soonwoo Kwon | Milos Raonic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #88 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #156 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #95 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,839 | 0 | 1 |
| 2021 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #53 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #13 | 1,987 | 0 | 3 |
| 2022 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #83 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #11 | 2,034 | 0 | 5 |
| 2023 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #196 | 1,778 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #8 | 2,087 | 0 | 6 |
| 2024 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #348 | 1,692 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #14 | 2,047 | 0 | 7 |
| 2026 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #155 | 1,732 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 52–19 | 73.2% | #3 | 2,143 | 0 | 8 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #24 | 2,053 | 0 | 8 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #18 | 1,952 | 0 | 8 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #31 | 1,919 | 0 | 8 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #14 | 1,996 | 0 | 8 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #70 | 1,964 | 0 | 8 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,909 | 0 | 8 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #238 | 1,903 | 0 | 8 |