H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Steve Krulevitz vs Ray Ruffels H2H: 1-1
Steve Krulevitz and Ray Ruffels are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Steve Krulevitz won the 1976 Hong Kong second round 1-6 6-3 8-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 75
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 80
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 1976* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Steve Krulevitz | 1-6 6-3 8-6 | Ray Ruffels | Match data |
| Sep 22, 1971* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Ray Ruffels | 6-4 6-4 | Steve Krulevitz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steve Krulevitz | #602 | #70 | 0 | 1,765 | 122 | 202 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ray Ruffels | #482 | #27 | 0 | 1,903 | 246 | 207 | 54.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Steve Krulevitz | Ray Ruffels | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1970 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1971 | 2–7 | 22.2% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1972 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1973 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #234 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 41–19 | 68.3% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1974 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #91 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 35–21 | 62.5% | — | 1,760 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1975 | 13–28 | 31.7% | #131 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 35–22 | 61.4% | — | 1,781 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1976 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 32–32 | 50.0% | — | 1,808 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1977 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #135 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1978 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #205 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,773 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1979 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #152 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #76 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1980 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #134 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #112 | 1,692 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 1981 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #82 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #27 | 1,782 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 1982 | 7–21 | 25.0% | #99 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #96 | 1,699 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 1983 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,617 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #480 | 1,544 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #482 | 1,539 | 0 | 5 |