H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Steve Krulevitz vs Ray Ruffels H2H: 1-1

Steve Krulevitz and Ray Ruffels are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Steve Krulevitz won the 1976 Hong Kong Open round of 64 1-6 6-3 8-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Steve Krulevitz
USA Age 75 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Ray Ruffels
AUS Age 80 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Steve Krulevitz 1-6 6-3 8-6 Ray Ruffels Match data Nov 9, 1976* R64 Hong Kong Open ATP 250 Hard
Ray Ruffels 6-4 6-4 Steve Krulevitz Match data Sep 22, 1971* R64 Los Angeles Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Steve Krulevitz #602 #70 0 1,766 122 201 37.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ray Ruffels #482 #27 0 1,905 246 205 54.5% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Steve Krulevitz Ray Ruffels
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1970 1–5 16.7% — 1,460 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1971 2–7 22.2% — 1,477 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1972 0–3 0.0% — 1,452 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1973 1–4 20.0% #234 1,438 0 0 1968 41–19 68.3% — 1,721 0 1
23 1974 16–23 41.0% #91 1,539 0 0 1969 35–21 62.5% — 1,757 0 2
24 1975 13–27 32.5% #131 1,567 0 0 1970 35–22 61.4% — 1,785 0 3
25 1976 23–23 50.0% #77 1,751 0 0 1971 32–32 50.0% — 1,826 0 3
26 1977 14–21 40.0% #99 1,689 0 0 1972 19–22 46.3% — 1,797 0 4
27 1978 6–15 28.6% #205 1,581 0 0 1973 1–1 50.0% #141 1,777 0 4
28 1979 6–13 31.6% #152 1,582 0 0 1974 17–18 48.6% #76 1,756 0 4
29 1980 19–23 45.2% #134 1,613 0 0 1975 16–22 42.1% #112 1,713 0 4
30 1981 14–13 51.9% #82 1,655 0 0 1976 34–20 63.0% #27 1,791 0 5
31 1982 7–21 25.0% #99 1,497 0 0 1977 12–17 41.4% #79 1,702 0 5
32 1983 0–2 0.0% #210 1,472 0 0 1978 3–6 33.3% #279 1,620 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 1979 0–4 0.0% #480 1,546 0 5
34 — — — — — — — 1980 1–1 50.0% #482 1,541 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Steve Krulevitz Ray Ruffels
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1970 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1971 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1973 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1968 3 3 6 50.0% 17 9 26 65.4% 21 6 27 77.8% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1974 2 5 7 28.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1969 3 4 7 42.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 25 10 35 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1975 1 3 4 25.0% 5 12 17 29.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 11 18 38.9% 1970 6 7 13 46.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 20 7 27 74.1% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1976 5 4 9 55.6% 10 12 22 45.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 1971 8 9 17 47.1% 14 11 25 56.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 6 7 13 46.2%
26 1977 2 4 6 33.3% 10 11 21 47.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1972 5 7 12 41.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 3 10 13 23.1%
27 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 4 9 13 30.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1973 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1979 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1974 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 7 10 30.0%
29 1980 10 8 18 55.6% 6 9 15 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1975 3 8 11 27.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 5 5 10 50.0%
30 1981 7 6 13 53.8% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1976 16 6 22 72.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 9 5 14 64.3% 6 5 11 54.5%
31 1982 1 6 7 14.3% 3 8 11 27.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1977 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
32 1983 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 33 50 83 39.8% 57 92 149 38.3% 14 21 35 40.0% 18 38 56 32.1% — 51 56 107 47.7% 61 49 110 55.5% 110 58 168 65.5% 24 42 66 36.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Steve Krulevitz Ray Ruffels
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1969 1483 98.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1970 1460 106.5 — — — — — +48 — 26.7% -2.00 0–1 1–0 — -0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1971 1477 108.2 — — — — +44 +41 — 25.0% -1.79 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — -0.90 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1972 1453 104.1 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1973 1439 107.1 — — — — — — +62 30.8% -1.08 0–1 1–0 — -0.17 1968 1721 125.7 — — — — -212 -127 +147 64.1% +1.22 7–5 (58%) — — +3.54
23 1974 1539 121.2 — — — — -52 -3 +6 44.8% -0.37 4–8 (33%) 7–3 (70%) — +1.61 1969 1757 128.5 — — — — -210 -159 +156 58.9% +0.65 3–5 (38%) — — +3.43
24 1975 1567 131.8 — — — — -45 -21 — 35.5% -0.75 5–6 (45%) 3–7 (30%) — -1.60 1970 1785 133.3 — — — — -187 -80 +164 58.6% +0.31 9–9 (50%) 8–3 (73%) — -1.28
25 1976 1751 135.7 — — — — -83 -96 -194 49.1% -0.06 6–7 (46%) 6–2 (75%) — -0.28 1971 1826 146.5 — — — — -57 -12 +37 52.6% +0.14 11–9 (55%) 12–9 (57%) — -7.83
26 1977 1690 135.8 — — — — -58 -3 — 40.2% -0.52 4–4 (50%) 3–7 (30%) — -1.53 1972 1798 141.9 — — — — -97 +17 +138 52.0% +0.14 7–5 (58%) 4–5 (44%) — -4.35
27 1978 1581 119.8 — — — — +15 +38 -43 30.0% -1.32 3–3 (50%) 1–5 (17%) — +0.20 1973 1778 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.03
28 1979 1582 119.9 — — — — +6 +10 -38 41.2% -0.59 1–5 (17%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.44 1974 1757 135.8 — — — — -100 +47 +162 45.8% -0.10 8–3 (73%) 8–4 (67%) — -1.39
29 1980 1614 129.7 — — — — +37 -48 — 46.0% -0.26 5–5 (50%) 8–6 (57%) — +2.70 1975 1714 143.7 — — — — -30 -20 +159 50.5% +0.31 3–11 (21%) 9–11 (45%) — -1.61
30 1981 1655 121.0 — — — — +18 -18 — 49.3% -0.39 6–5 (55%) 5–2 (71%) — +1.99 1976 1792 139.1 — — — — +77 -171 +107 61.3% +0.85 12–9 (57%) 8–12 (40%) — +5.63
31 1982 1498 113.2 — — — — +18 +84 +43 33.8% -1.20 4–8 (33%) 2–5 (29%) — +0.91 1977 1703 119.9 — — — — -6 -71 +90 49.4% -0.08 2–9 (18%) 8–4 (67%) — +1.49
32 1983 1473 95.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.80 0–1 — — +0.32 1978 1621 105.7 — — — — — +20 +87 39.1% -0.57 0–2 — — +0.98
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1546 95.1 — — — — — — +75 10.0% -2.90 0–1 1–0 — +0.63
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1541 101.9 — — — — — — — 60.0% +1.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.41
Career — 1767 130.9 — — — — -17 -12 -19 40.8% -0.64 40–57 (41%) 39–41 (49%) 96.9 +0.99 — 1906 139.6 — — — — -63 -70 +135 55.3% +0.40 62–69 (47%) 58–49 (54%) 99.8 -0.07

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.