H2H data updated: 2026-07-21 02:15 UTC
Taro Daniel vs Adrian Menendez Maceiras H2H: 1-0
Taro Daniel holds a 1–0 lead over Adrian Menendez Maceiras in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Taro Daniel leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Taro Daniel won the 2019 Marrakech fourth round 6-2 1-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Japan
Age 33
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2019* | Marrakech | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Taro Daniel | 6-2 1-6 6-1 | Adrian Menendez Maceiras | Match data |
| Mar 26, 2015* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Adrian Menendez Maceiras | 1-6 6-3 6-3 | Taro Daniel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taro Daniel | #192 | #58 | 893 | 1,815 | 81 | 146 | 35.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Adrian Menendez Maceiras | — | — | — | 1,643 | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Taro Daniel | Adrian Menendez Maceiras | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #177 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #96 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #127 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #99 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #77 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #110 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #117 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #75 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 10–23 | 30.3% | #84 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #376 | 1,503 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |