H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Taro Daniel vs Gilles Simon H2H: 0-1

Gilles Simon holds a 1–0 lead over Taro Daniel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gilles Simon leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Gilles Simon won the 2019 Grand Prix Hassan II quarterfinal 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Taro Daniel
Japan Age 33 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Gilles Simon
FRA Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Gilles Simon 6-3 6-3 Taro Daniel Match data Aug 22, 2020* Q1 Q Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
Gilles Simon #27 6-4 7-5 Taro Daniel #75 Match data Apr 13, 2019* QF Grand Prix Hassan II ATP 250 Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Taro Daniel #160 #58 893 1,815 83 149 35.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Gilles Simon #464 #6 4,170 2,092 499 383 56.6% 0 0 0 1 13 14

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Taro Daniel Gilles Simon
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2004 0–1 0.0% #177 1,460 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2005 6–6 50.0% #124 1,540 0 0
21 2014 2–5 28.6% #177 1,646 0 0 2006 24–24 50.0% #45 1,633 0 0
22 2015 1–5 16.7% #96 1,702 0 0 2007 35–26 57.4% #29 1,783 0 2
23 2016 8–15 34.8% #127 1,706 0 0 2008 52–27 65.8% #7 1,983 0 5
24 2017 4–9 30.8% #99 1,652 0 0 2009 45–24 65.2% #15 1,939 0 6
25 2018 16–17 48.5% #77 1,710 0 1 2010 22–17 56.4% #41 1,928 0 7
26 2019 11–18 37.9% #110 1,656 0 1 2011 38–25 60.3% #12 1,906 0 9
27 2020 1–4 20.0% #117 1,596 0 1 2012 43–24 64.2% #16 1,950 0 10
28 2021 5–11 31.2% #125 1,608 0 1 2013 36–22 62.1% #19 1,925 0 11
29 2022 12–18 40.0% #92 1,691 0 1 2014 28–25 52.8% #21 1,946 0 11
30 2023 11–16 40.7% #75 1,687 0 1 2015 41–22 65.1% #15 1,989 0 12
31 2024 10–24 29.4% #84 1,619 0 1 2016 32–26 55.2% #25 1,945 0 12
32 2025 2–6 25.0% #376 1,499 0 1 2017 15–25 37.5% #89 1,767 0 12
33 2026 0–1 0.0% #160 1,534 0 1 2018 33–24 57.9% #30 1,869 0 14
34 — — — — — — — 2019 27–28 49.1% #55 1,776 0 14
35 — — — — — — — 2020 10–12 45.5% #63 1,755 0 14
36 — — — — — — — 2021 5–17 22.7% #122 1,624 0 14
37 — — — — — — — 2022 7–8 46.7% #143 1,703 0 14

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Taro Daniel Gilles Simon
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — —
21 2014 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 7 9 16 43.8% 15 10 25 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 2015 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 14 11 25 56.0% 18 10 28 64.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 2016 3 5 8 37.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 32 18 50 64.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0%
24 2017 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 34 15 49 69.4% 7 7 14 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
25 2018 7 11 18 38.9% 9 4 13 69.2% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2010 17 13 30 56.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
26 2019 4 7 11 36.4% 7 11 18 38.9% — — — — — — — — 2011 22 16 38 57.9% 14 7 21 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2020 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 22 12 34 64.7% 18 9 27 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
28 2021 2 6 8 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — 2013 23 14 37 62.2% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
29 2022 10 14 24 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2014 17 14 31 54.8% 8 9 17 47.1% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
30 2023 9 11 20 45.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2015 25 15 40 62.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — —
31 2024 8 15 23 34.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2016 22 17 39 56.4% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
32 2025 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2017 9 13 22 40.9% 5 9 14 35.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
33 2026 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2018 19 13 32 59.4% 10 8 18 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 14 18 32 43.8% 5 6 11 45.5% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 10 10 20 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 4 7 11 36.4% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 4 5 9 44.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 48 86 134 35.8% 35 53 88 39.8% 0 10 10 0.0% — — — — — 297 224 521 57.0% 146 112 258 56.6% 52 42 94 55.3% 4 5 9 44.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 227/232 of Taro Daniel's and 866/882 of Gilles Simon's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Taro Daniel Gilles Simon
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 1/1 5.0 1.0 69.7% 64.5% 55.6% 50.0% 100.0% 61.8% 38.0%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 12/12 3.5 1.8 54.6% 66.1% 51.5% 51.7% 45.2% 59.6% 38.6%
21 2014 7/7 1.4 2.7 63.5% 58.8% 50.2% 50.0% 29.3% 55.9% 31.4% 2006 48/48 4.0 1.6 54.9% 67.0% 50.5% 50.9% 41.9% 59.4% 39.0%
22 2015 6/6 3.5 1.8 64.9% 60.6% 48.0% 57.4% 55.6% 55.7% 32.6% 2007 61/61 3.7 1.8 56.8% 66.3% 49.4% 57.1% 50.7% 59.1% 40.4%
23 2016 20/23 3.2 2.6 64.7% 65.6% 51.0% 57.1% 44.4% 60.3% 38.0% 2008 75/79 4.5 2.1 57.5% 69.6% 53.7% 57.5% 39.4% 62.8% 39.4%
24 2017 13/13 3.2 3.5 65.7% 64.3% 46.2% 60.3% 34.9% 57.9% 34.8% 2009 69/69 6.1 2.1 55.0% 74.4% 54.7% 66.1% 46.9% 65.6% 39.4%
25 2018 33/33 3.4 3.7 59.5% 66.5% 50.3% 59.6% 41.8% 59.9% 35.2% 2010 38/39 6.1 2.5 55.7% 75.1% 53.0% 61.3% 36.9% 65.4% 36.8%
26 2019 29/29 3.2 2.3 65.0% 65.7% 46.1% 53.8% 38.2% 58.6% 36.1% 2011 63/63 4.7 2.5 56.0% 69.4% 50.9% 52.0% 46.6% 61.3% 40.9%
27 2020 5/5 7.6 2.6 57.8% 69.9% 52.8% 48.7% 29.3% 62.8% 35.2% 2012 63/67 4.0 2.0 55.9% 69.9% 52.9% 57.5% 41.4% 62.3% 40.5%
28 2021 15/16 3.5 2.5 61.6% 69.1% 51.3% 58.5% 51.3% 62.2% 31.4% 2013 58/58 4.1 2.5 56.8% 69.0% 49.7% 59.2% 41.8% 60.6% 39.1%
29 2022 30/30 5.9 1.8 62.0% 70.8% 46.8% 53.7% 43.0% 61.7% 35.8% 2014 52/53 5.8 2.5 55.8% 71.4% 50.8% 63.3% 43.7% 62.7% 40.0%
30 2023 27/27 3.5 2.7 58.9% 63.8% 53.0% 52.5% 43.4% 60.3% 37.7% 2015 63/63 3.6 2.4 58.3% 68.7% 52.6% 53.5% 50.8% 62.1% 40.9%
31 2024 33/34 4.2 2.0 61.6% 65.7% 50.1% 55.0% 37.9% 59.0% 32.4% 2016 55/58 3.3 2.6 57.9% 67.1% 52.5% 57.3% 45.0% 60.7% 40.1%
32 2025 8/8 6.0 2.4 63.1% 74.3% 46.1% 41.9% 34.0% 64.1% 31.0% 2017 40/40 2.9 2.6 55.0% 67.7% 51.1% 55.2% 44.6% 60.4% 37.9%
33 2026 1/1 3.0 1.0 65.0% 62.0% 54.0% 67.0% 20.0% 59.0% 33.0% 2018 56/57 4.4 2.2 60.5% 70.8% 50.8% 56.2% 44.5% 62.9% 41.2%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 54/55 3.9 2.6 62.1% 68.3% 49.8% 61.7% 42.1% 61.6% 39.0%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 22/22 4.4 3.0 55.1% 70.4% 50.2% 53.1% 48.8% 61.8% 40.4%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 21/22 2.3 4.2 60.6% 66.3% 44.6% 45.0% 48.5% 57.5% 34.9%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 15/15 2.9 2.2 61.4% 65.3% 48.5% 54.8% 40.7% 58.5% 36.5%
Career — 227/232 3.9 2.5 62.1% 66.4% 49.4% 55.1% 40.9% 59.9% 34.9% — 866/882 4.3 2.3 57.2% 69.4% 51.4% 57.2% 44.5% 61.8% 39.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Taro Daniel Gilles Simon
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1460 98.1 -0.26 -0.85 0.994 50.6% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.17
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1540 122.5 -2.20 +0.53 0.954 48.7% -20 +36 — 42.4% -0.36 6–1 (86%) 0–4 (0%) — +0.22
21 2014 1646 125.4 -3.26 -0.64 0.711 44.3% -25 +34 — 29.4% -1.53 1–1 3–2 (60%) — -0.42 2006 1633 131.6 -2.73 +1.62 0.960 49.1% -36 +38 -42 46.2% -0.23 12–4 (75%) 5–9 (36%) — -0.30
22 2015 1702 121.4 -3.31 -1.67 0.737 44.1% -39 +38 — 20.0% -2.07 1–1 2–0 — -0.33 2007 1784 140.3 -2.50 +3.16 0.988 50.0% -97 +67 -200 50.7% +0.01 14–6 (70%) 10–9 (53%) — -1.35
23 2016 1706 134.6 -2.42 +0.61 0.958 49.2% -27 +26 — 40.0% -0.65 0–6 (0%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.49 2008 1984 156.8 +0.08 +3.37 1.060 51.1% -7 -90 -295 59.8% +0.54 21–9 (70%) 17–9 (65%) — +0.42
24 2017 1653 118.2 -2.87 -0.97 0.828 46.7% -13 +55 — 40.0% -0.98 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.44 2009 1940 155.0 +1.89 +2.48 1.145 52.4% +57 -140 -158 62.4% +0.88 13–10 (57%) 16–10 (62%) — +4.99
25 2018 1710 134.1 -3.10 -0.06 0.876 47.9% -54 +87 — 45.8% -0.60 8–4 (67%) 12–3 (80%) — -0.54 2010 1928 152.1 +2.01 +0.87 1.063 50.8% +47 -166 -126 50.0% +0.16 11–3 (79%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.07
26 2019 1656 126.5 -3.85 -0.49 0.872 47.7% -5 +17 — 36.8% -0.90 5–5 (50%) 3–7 (30%) — +1.14 2011 1907 159.5 -0.73 +3.87 1.055 51.0% -11 +50 -96 58.9% +0.64 12–12 (50%) 11–15 (42%) — +0.18
27 2020 1597 113.2 -1.69 -0.71 0.947 48.2% +7 — — 35.7% -1.00 0–2 2–2 (50%) — +0.90 2012 1950 157.5 -0.02 +3.35 1.075 51.2% +13 +23 -123 59.0% +0.54 11–10 (52%) 9–13 (41%) — +3.21
28 2021 1608 121.5 -1.63 -2.30 0.831 47.7% -60 +72 — 36.4% -0.64 3–5 (38%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.55 2013 1925 156.5 -2.02 +2.35 0.991 50.1% +20 +80 -82 57.2% +0.14 11–6 (65%) 16–8 (67%) — +1.94
29 2022 1691 139.1 -0.98 -0.76 0.934 49.0% +1 0 — 42.9% -0.36 4–4 (50%) 7–5 (58%) — -1.01 2014 1947 160.4 -0.47 +3.65 1.071 51.4% +27 -53 -64 51.9% +0.42 9–9 (50%) 9–12 (43%) — +1.84
30 2023 1687 137.5 -2.75 +1.78 0.949 49.0% +85 -57 — 42.3% -0.59 4–5 (44%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.98 2015 1990 161.4 -1.32 +4.77 1.080 51.5% -18 -44 +40 60.4% +0.66 15–8 (65%) 12–13 (48%) — +1.25
31 2024 1620 133.6 -3.78 -1.95 0.791 46.0% +58 -15 -129 31.3% -1.25 3–5 (38%) 3–10 (23%) — -1.01 2016 1945 160.5 -1.63 +3.73 1.020 50.5% +22 -37 +11 53.5% +0.21 13–10 (57%) 13–11 (54%) — +1.19
32 2025 1500 106.7 -0.34 -2.35 0.864 48.1% +47 — — 36.4% -0.64 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.26 2017 1767 147.6 -2.41 +2.04 0.958 49.2% +68 +9 +71 41.3% -0.41 7–7 (50%) 5–10 (33%) — -1.50
33 2026 1535 107.9 +2.05 -1.38 0.805 45.0% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.10 2018 1870 151.0 -0.74 +4.77 1.113 51.8% -5 -66 -8 59.4% +0.68 6–8 (43%) 21–16 (57%) — +0.92
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1777 145.4 -2.46 +2.32 1.015 49.9% +15 -28 +102 50.4% +0.06 12–7 (63%) 10–15 (40%) — +2.17
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1756 144.5 -1.00 +2.76 1.058 50.9% +43 — — 48.2% +0.12 2–3 (40%) 4–2 (67%) — -1.39
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1625 120.8 -3.59 -1.65 0.820 46.4% +88 -27 +101 30.4% -1.23 2–6 (25%) 1–5 (17%) — -1.48
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1704 125.3 -2.58 +1.62 0.879 47.7% +12 -42 — 44.4% -0.72 4–0 (100%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.44
Career — 1816 134.0 -2.66 -0.57 0.871 47.7% +11 +30 -129 38.4% -0.80 32–44 (42%) 43–52 (45%) 96.1 -0.26 — 2092 157.4 -1.00 +2.94 1.034 50.6% +11 -7 -45 54.1% +0.28 181–120 (60%) 168–170 (50%) 105.5 +1.37

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.