H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Taro Daniel vs Martin Klizan H2H: 1-0
Taro Daniel holds a 1–0 lead over Martin Klizan in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Taro Daniel leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Taro Daniel won the 2016 Roland Garros first round 3-6 4-6 7-5 6-4 3-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Japan
Age 33
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Slovakia
Age 37
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2020 | Sofia | ATP 250 | Q2 | Hard | Taro Daniel | 6-3 6-4 | Martin Klizan | Match data |
| May 24, 2016* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Taro Daniel | 3-6 4-6 7-5 6-4 3-0 (ret.) | Martin Klizan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taro Daniel | #194 | #58 | 893 | 1,815 | 81 | 146 | 35.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Martin Klizan | #831 | #24 | 1,445 | 1,979 | 128 | 146 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Taro Daniel | Martin Klizan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #395 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #155 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #177 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #117 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #96 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2016 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #127 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2017 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #99 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #34 | 1,899 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2018 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #77 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #43 | 1,794 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2019 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #110 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #35 | 1,750 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #117 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #141 | 1,755 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2021 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 18–9 | 66.7% | #41 | 1,917 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2022 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,703 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2023 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #75 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,649 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2024 | 10–23 | 30.3% | #84 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2025 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #376 | 1,503 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,538 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #835 | 1,556 | 0 | 6 |