H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Taro Daniel vs Martin Klizan H2H: 1-0

Taro Daniel holds a 1–0 lead over Martin Klizan in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Taro Daniel leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Taro Daniel won the 2016 Roland Garros first round 3-6 4-6 7-5 6-4 3-0 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Taro Daniel
Japan Age 33 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Martin Klizan
Slovakia Age 37 Left-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Taro Daniel #115 6-3 6-4 Martin Klizan #150 Match data Nov 9, 2020 Q2 Q Sofia ATP 250 Hard
Taro Daniel #93 3-6 4-6 7-5 6-4 3-0 (ret.) Martin Klizan #45 Match data May 24, 2016* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Taro Daniel #160 #58 893 1,815 83 149 35.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Martin Klizan #831 #24 1,445 1,979 128 147 46.5% 0 0 0 2 4 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Taro Daniel Martin Klizan
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2007 1–1 50.0% #395 1,524 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2009 0–1 0.0% #234 1,542 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2010 1–2 33.3% #155 1,607 0 0
21 2014 2–5 28.6% #177 1,646 0 0 2011 0–2 0.0% #117 1,600 0 0
22 2015 1–5 16.7% #96 1,702 0 0 2012 16–14 53.3% #30 1,792 0 1
23 2016 8–15 34.8% #127 1,706 0 0 2013 12–24 33.3% #108 1,690 0 1
24 2017 4–9 30.8% #99 1,652 0 0 2014 23–16 59.0% #34 1,930 0 2
25 2018 16–17 48.5% #77 1,710 0 1 2015 24–27 47.1% #43 1,797 0 3
26 2019 11–18 37.9% #110 1,656 0 1 2016 14–15 48.3% #35 1,752 0 5
27 2020 1–4 20.0% #117 1,596 0 1 2017 10–15 40.0% #141 1,757 0 5
28 2021 5–11 31.2% #125 1,608 0 1 2018 18–9 66.7% #41 1,917 0 6
29 2022 12–18 40.0% #92 1,691 0 1 2019 9–18 33.3% #141 1,701 0 6
30 2023 11–16 40.7% #75 1,687 0 1 2020 0–2 0.0% #151 1,648 0 6
31 2024 10–24 29.4% #84 1,619 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2025 2–6 25.0% #376 1,499 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2026 0–1 0.0% #160 1,534 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — 2025 0–1 0.0% #835 1,555 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Taro Daniel Martin Klizan
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 2014 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2015 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2012 10 6 16 62.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
23 2016 3 5 8 37.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2013 4 13 17 23.5% 7 9 16 43.8% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2017 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 8 8 16 50.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 2018 7 11 18 38.9% 9 4 13 69.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 2015 12 14 26 46.2% 12 11 23 52.2% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 2019 4 7 11 36.4% 7 11 18 38.9% — — — — 2016 8 12 20 40.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2020 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 2017 5 8 13 38.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 2021 2 6 8 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 2018 6 5 11 54.5% 12 4 16 75.0% — — — —
29 2022 10 14 24 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2019 4 9 13 30.8% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2023 9 11 20 45.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2020 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2024 8 15 23 34.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2025 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2026 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 48 86 134 35.8% 35 53 88 39.8% 0 10 10 0.0% — 58 79 137 42.3% 66 55 121 54.5% 4 13 17 23.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 227/232 of Taro Daniel's and 271/275 of Martin Klizan's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Taro Daniel Martin Klizan
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 2/2 4.5 5.0 50.7% 64.2% 50.8% 61.7% 45.0% 58.5% 41.6%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 1/1 2.0 3.0 44.4% 64.3% 37.1% 44.4% 30.0% 49.2% 43.2%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 3/3 4.7 7.3 48.1% 67.9% 41.9% 64.6% 41.1% 54.6% 35.4%
21 2014 7/7 1.4 2.7 63.5% 58.8% 50.2% 50.0% 29.3% 55.9% 31.4% 2011 2/2 1.5 5.5 60.6% 52.6% 35.0% 22.7% 29.2% 45.7% 35.2%
22 2015 6/6 3.5 1.8 64.9% 60.6% 48.0% 57.4% 55.6% 55.7% 32.6% 2012 29/30 3.9 3.5 56.1% 71.1% 50.5% 56.3% 48.2% 62.1% 41.4%
23 2016 20/23 3.2 2.6 64.7% 65.6% 51.0% 57.1% 44.4% 60.3% 38.0% 2013 36/36 6.0 3.9 54.7% 67.3% 48.8% 60.3% 40.6% 58.8% 36.4%
24 2017 13/13 3.2 3.5 65.7% 64.3% 46.2% 60.3% 34.9% 57.9% 34.8% 2014 36/39 5.7 3.2 56.9% 73.3% 52.4% 61.3% 44.3% 63.9% 37.9%
25 2018 33/33 3.4 3.7 59.5% 66.5% 50.3% 59.6% 41.8% 59.9% 35.2% 2015 51/51 4.8 3.6 57.5% 68.9% 48.4% 56.2% 42.0% 60.3% 34.4%
26 2019 29/29 3.2 2.3 65.0% 65.7% 46.1% 53.8% 38.2% 58.6% 36.1% 2016 29/29 4.6 4.4 58.0% 69.6% 49.4% 58.1% 49.6% 60.7% 38.5%
27 2020 5/5 7.6 2.6 57.8% 69.9% 52.8% 48.7% 29.3% 62.8% 35.2% 2017 25/25 3.3 3.3 64.7% 67.0% 50.6% 58.0% 40.2% 61.2% 36.6%
28 2021 15/16 3.5 2.5 61.6% 69.1% 51.3% 58.5% 51.3% 62.2% 31.4% 2018 27/27 4.5 2.4 62.1% 70.2% 55.5% 59.1% 54.5% 64.5% 37.8%
29 2022 30/30 5.9 1.8 62.0% 70.8% 46.8% 53.7% 43.0% 61.7% 35.8% 2019 27/27 4.3 4.5 58.1% 67.0% 47.9% 55.1% 48.2% 58.9% 35.1%
30 2023 27/27 3.5 2.7 58.9% 63.8% 53.0% 52.5% 43.4% 60.3% 37.7% 2020 2/2 5.0 1.5 55.6% 68.0% 47.9% 51.4% 32.5% 59.0% 34.8%
31 2024 33/34 4.2 2.0 61.6% 65.7% 50.1% 55.0% 37.9% 59.0% 32.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2025 8/8 6.0 2.4 63.1% 74.3% 46.1% 41.9% 34.0% 64.1% 31.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2026 1/1 3.0 1.0 65.0% 62.0% 54.0% 67.0% 20.0% 59.0% 33.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 1/1 0.0 4.0 64.0% 72.0% 42.0% 56.0% 60.0% 62.0% 29.0%
Career — 227/232 3.9 2.5 62.1% 66.4% 49.4% 55.1% 40.9% 59.9% 34.9% — 271/275 4.7 3.7 58.0% 69.2% 50.0% 57.8% 45.2% 60.9% 37.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Taro Daniel Martin Klizan
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1524 104.9 -2.40 -0.79 1.001 50.8% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — 0–1 — +0.04
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1506 98.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1543 104.5 -2.83 -2.96 0.851 46.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.11
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1607 113.5 +0.26 +1.44 0.780 45.9% — — — 33.3% -0.78 1–1 — — -0.14
21 2014 1646 125.4 -3.26 -0.64 0.711 44.3% -25 +34 — 29.4% -1.53 1–1 3–2 (60%) — -0.42 2011 1601 108.6 -3.98 +3.39 0.648 40.3% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — -0.28
22 2015 1702 121.4 -3.31 -1.67 0.737 44.1% -39 +38 — 20.0% -2.07 1–1 2–0 — -0.33 2012 1793 136.2 -0.83 +2.99 1.092 51.5% -45 -158 -236 52.6% +0.10 4–5 (44%) 3–7 (30%) — +0.80
23 2016 1706 134.6 -2.42 +0.61 0.958 49.2% -27 +26 — 40.0% -0.65 0–6 (0%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.49 2013 1690 141.7 -2.90 -0.83 0.884 48.1% -55 +13 -130 39.3% -0.74 4–11 (27%) 6–8 (43%) — +0.17
24 2017 1653 118.2 -2.87 -0.97 0.828 46.7% -13 +55 — 40.0% -0.98 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.44 2014 1930 145.3 +0.98 +1.95 1.050 51.1% -137 +27 -329 56.4% +0.30 10–4 (71%) 11–8 (58%) — -2.11
25 2018 1710 134.1 -3.10 -0.06 0.876 47.9% -54 +87 — 45.8% -0.60 8–4 (67%) 12–3 (80%) — -0.54 2015 1798 145.6 -2.85 -1.50 0.865 47.5% -11 +44 — 45.3% -0.62 11–6 (65%) 17–5 (77%) — -0.15
26 2019 1656 126.5 -3.85 -0.49 0.872 47.7% -5 +17 — 36.8% -0.90 5–5 (50%) 3–7 (30%) — +1.14 2016 1753 151.0 -1.88 +1.38 0.979 50.0% +2 +114 — 52.2% +0.12 6–7 (46%) 4–6 (40%) — +1.22
27 2020 1597 113.2 -1.69 -0.71 0.947 48.2% +7 — — 35.7% -1.00 0–2 2–2 (50%) — +0.90 2017 1757 144.6 -1.26 +0.29 0.943 49.2% -12 +78 — 47.5% +0.03 4–5 (44%) 6–9 (40%) — -0.38
28 2021 1608 121.5 -1.63 -2.30 0.831 47.7% -60 +72 — 36.4% -0.64 3–5 (38%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.55 2018 1918 149.4 +0.58 +1.54 1.064 51.4% -96 +77 — 58.2% +0.43 8–2 (80%) 5–3 (63%) — -2.08
29 2022 1691 139.1 -0.98 -0.76 0.934 49.0% +1 0 — 42.9% -0.36 4–4 (50%) 7–5 (58%) — -1.01 2019 1702 134.3 -4.15 -1.03 0.853 47.6% +16 +145 — 37.1% -0.73 4–5 (44%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.18
30 2023 1687 137.5 -2.75 +1.78 0.949 49.0% +85 -57 — 42.3% -0.59 4–5 (44%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.98 2020 1649 111.4 -0.19 -1.33 0.847 45.8% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.18
31 2024 1620 133.6 -3.78 -1.95 0.791 46.0% +58 -15 -129 31.3% -1.25 3–5 (38%) 3–10 (23%) — -1.01 2021 1541 88.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2025 1500 106.7 -0.34 -2.35 0.864 48.1% +47 — — 36.4% -0.64 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2026 1535 107.9 +2.06 -1.39 0.805 45.0% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1556 101.9 -0.23 -0.93 0.763 47.0% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — +0.01
Career — 1816 134.0 -2.66 -0.57 0.871 47.7% +11 +30 -129 38.4% -0.80 32–44 (42%) 43–52 (45%) 96.1 -0.26 — 1980 146.1 -1.61 +0.42 0.947 49.3% -39 +43 -241 47.5% -0.22 52–48 (52%) 59–55 (52%) 103.7 -1.16

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.