H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Tennys Sandgren vs Frank Dancevic H2H: 0-1

Frank Dancevic holds a 1–0 lead over Tennys Sandgren in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Frank Dancevic leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Frank Dancevic won the 2017 Newport round of 32 6-7(5) 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tennys Sandgren
USA Age 35 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Frank Dancevic
CAN Age 41 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Frank Dancevic #422 6-7(5) 6-3 6-2 Tennys Sandgren #101 Match data Jul 20, 2017* R32 Newport ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tennys Sandgren #1,243 #41 1,091 1,872 47 76 38.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Frank Dancevic #406 #65 783 1,771 54 90 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tennys Sandgren Frank Dancevic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2002 1–2 33.3% — 1,505 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2003 0–1 0.0% #201 1,497 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2004 1–2 33.3% #171 1,486 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2005 2–6 25.0% #188 1,472 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2006 6–9 40.0% #88 1,557 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2007 16–18 47.1% #72 1,696 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2008 6–11 35.3% #130 1,652 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2009 9–11 45.0% #143 1,698 0 0
25 2017 2–6 25.0% #96 1,498 0 0 2010 2–3 40.0% #269 1,663 0 0
26 2018 16–20 44.4% #61 1,662 0 0 2011 2–6 25.0% #151 1,696 0 0
27 2019 13–17 43.3% #68 1,763 0 1 2012 1–5 16.7% #165 1,604 0 0
28 2020 8–13 38.1% #49 1,758 0 1 2013 2–3 40.0% #122 1,687 0 0
29 2021 8–16 33.3% #96 1,686 0 1 2014 2–6 25.0% #149 1,654 0 0
30 2022 0–3 0.0% #265 1,673 0 1 2015 0–3 0.0% #209 1,601 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2016 3–3 50.0% #241 1,663 0 0
32 2024 0–1 0.0% #506 1,645 0 1 2017 1–1 50.0% #363 1,658 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tennys Sandgren Frank Dancevic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 12 14 26 46.2% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
25 2017 2 2 4 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
26 2018 9 10 19 47.4% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2019 8 12 20 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
28 2020 7 10 17 41.2% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2021 4 9 13 30.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2014 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
30 2022 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
32 2024 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 30 47 77 39.0% 9 21 30 30.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — — 32 61 93 34.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 21 23 44 47.7% 1 2 3 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 122/123 of Tennys Sandgren's and 143/144 of Frank Dancevic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tennys Sandgren Frank Dancevic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 3/3 6.7 3.7 49.8% 68.8% 44.1% 52.2% 45.1% 56.5% 29.6%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 1/1 8.0 5.0 49.1% 73.1% 44.4% 69.2% 30.8% 58.5% 36.4%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 3/3 3.0 3.0 63.1% 75.9% 37.7% 39.9% 14.3% 61.5% 29.3%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 8/8 6.1 2.3 57.1% 66.2% 48.8% 55.0% 26.3% 58.1% 34.5%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 15/15 6.3 1.3 62.8% 70.9% 52.0% 60.1% 37.9% 64.0% 34.1%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 34/34 12.4 2.5 60.2% 75.4% 52.3% 59.8% 38.5% 66.0% 34.1%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 16/17 9.4 2.1 61.3% 73.3% 51.1% 65.5% 37.9% 64.5% 32.8%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 20/20 7.5 1.6 60.8% 74.2% 54.4% 56.4% 38.6% 66.5% 31.5%
25 2017 8/8 4.6 1.5 62.3% 74.5% 45.2% 61.2% 33.5% 63.4% 32.4% 2010 5/5 8.4 2.8 56.2% 75.4% 49.5% 63.0% 34.7% 63.8% 32.3%
26 2018 36/36 8.3 2.5 60.9% 74.5% 49.9% 63.9% 46.0% 64.8% 34.2% 2011 8/8 10.5 3.1 58.6% 68.7% 50.2% 52.8% 27.1% 60.8% 29.8%
27 2019 30/30 9.0 2.9 60.3% 73.0% 47.9% 57.6% 37.4% 63.1% 35.0% 2012 6/6 4.7 2.8 55.1% 61.7% 41.1% 49.4% 45.8% 52.1% 20.7%
28 2020 21/21 11.7 3.2 62.5% 74.3% 50.1% 68.5% 35.4% 65.1% 32.4% 2013 5/5 9.6 2.8 62.4% 69.0% 48.7% 61.0% 40.8% 61.5% 35.4%
29 2021 23/24 7.8 2.7 58.7% 70.5% 45.3% 51.1% 34.4% 60.1% 32.7% 2014 8/8 7.1 3.9 58.2% 67.9% 46.4% 51.2% 34.5% 58.9% 29.1%
30 2022 3/3 3.0 4.3 54.3% 72.7% 42.1% 47.5% 10.0% 58.9% 28.8% 2015 3/3 5.3 3.0 59.3% 71.1% 43.1% 55.0% 33.3% 59.6% 28.3%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 6/6 6.3 1.7 62.1% 74.2% 56.7% 71.1% 24.7% 67.9% 30.5%
32 2024 1/1 13.0 0.0 65.8% 73.1% 40.7% 66.7% 25.0% 62.0% 29.5% 2017 2/2 5.0 2.0 65.2% 76.9% 44.3% 50.0% 22.2% 65.7% 26.6%
Career — 122/123 8.6 2.7 60.6% 73.3% 48.0% 60.2% 38.0% 63.3% 33.5% — 143/144 8.6 2.3 59.9% 72.1% 50.4% 58.3% 35.7% 63.4% 31.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tennys Sandgren Frank Dancevic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2009 1485 97.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1506 104.6 +0.04 -3.24 0.682 44.0% +22 — — 28.6% -1.29 1–0 0–1 — +0.04
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1497 102.3 +2.47 -1.76 0.878 47.4% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — +0.06
19 2011 1469 97.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1486 103.8 -0.52 -3.23 0.760 44.9% — — — 28.6% -2.00 1–0 1–0 — +0.16
20 2012 1473 97.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1473 101.3 -2.56 -1.42 0.825 46.8% +33 — — 27.8% -1.28 1–1 1–1 — +0.82
21 2013 1465 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1558 120.1 +0.72 -1.24 0.948 48.9% -17 — +44 46.2% -0.31 2–6 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 97.3 +0.23
22 2014 1444 100.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1697 136.2 +2.37 -1.18 1.003 49.7% -6 — -95 48.4% -0.16 8–8 (50%) 8–7 (53%) 102.4 -0.87
23 2015 1428 100.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1653 126.4 +1.17 -2.13 0.925 49.7% -7 — +11 44.7% -0.34 2–5 (29%) 4–5 (44%) 96.2 +0.19
24 2016 1429 106.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1699 134.9 +1.81 -2.41 0.940 48.8% +28 — +6 43.5% -0.39 2–2 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 99.0 -0.65
25 2017 1499 115.3 -0.12 -0.71 0.884 47.3% -3 +27 — 22.2% -1.89 0–1 2–0 — -0.15 2010 1663 112.5 -0.81 -0.02 0.891 48.2% — — +83 50.0% -0.42 0–2 3–0 (100%) — -0.03
26 2018 1663 141.8 +0.68 -1.43 0.972 49.7% +3 -100 — 44.4% -0.24 4–5 (44%) 9–14 (39%) 102.2 +0.49 2011 1696 122.6 -2.16 -3.36 0.759 45.7% +7 — — 36.4% -0.95 1–2 (33%) 4–2 (67%) 99.2 +0.72
27 2019 1764 140.9 -0.64 -0.88 0.948 49.1% -62 — +8 47.1% -0.32 3–6 (33%) 9–14 (39%) 96.7 +0.01 2012 1605 113.3 -3.12 -6.61 0.432 37.6% +71 — — 25.0% -2.00 — 1–1 — +0.47
28 2020 1758 142.5 +1.13 -2.00 0.928 49.0% -36 -116 — 45.3% -0.20 3–7 (30%) 7–10 (41%) 96.1 -0.26 2013 1688 118.1 -0.19 -0.40 0.918 48.5% +6 — — 43.8% -0.44 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 100.8 -0.09
29 2021 1687 130.0 -1.47 -2.11 0.820 47.0% -7 -100 +53 32.7% -1.20 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 98.0 -1.96 2014 1655 115.5 -2.84 -3.79 0.710 44.6% +4 — — 33.3% -1.37 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 99.1 +0.12
30 2022 1674 119.3 -1.51 -2.44 0.700 44.1% -10 — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.51 2015 1602 110.2 -0.20 -3.32 0.701 44.7% +41 — — 0.0% -2.67 — — — +0.04
31 2023 1634 103.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1663 114.3 -0.72 -0.87 0.948 49.4% — — +100 46.7% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 3–3 (50%) 100.4 +0.11
32 2024 1645 105.5 +1.35 -1.03 0.776 45.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.01 2017 1658 105.5 -0.71 -1.04 0.776 46.9% — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.57
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1596 104.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1590 103.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1577 100.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1872 138.2 -0.07 -1.50 0.913 48.6% -25 -89 +27 41.1% -0.57 12–23 (34%) 30–42 (42%) 95.4 -1.94 — 1772 127.2 +0.40 -2.03 0.872 47.8% +8 — +18 41.8% -0.57 23–32 (42%) 38–34 (53%) 98.0 +1.31

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.