H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Tennys Sandgren vs Joao Sousa H2H: 1-0
Tennys Sandgren holds a 1–0 lead over Joao Sousa in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tennys Sandgren leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tennys Sandgren won the 2021 Newport third round 6-4 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 34
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
POR
Age 37
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2021* | Newport | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Tennys Sandgren | 6-4 7-6(3) | Joao Sousa | Match data |
| Sep 15, 2020* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | Q3 | Clay | Tennys Sandgren | 6-3 6-0 | Joao Sousa | Match data |
| Oct 29, 2018 | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Joao Sousa | 6-7(1) 6-3 6-4 | Tennys Sandgren | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tennys Sandgren | #1,243 | #41 | 1,091 | 1,870 | 47 | 75 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Joao Sousa | #954 | #28 | 1,355 | 1,917 | 189 | 247 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tennys Sandgren | Joao Sousa | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #592 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #192 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #49 | 1,796 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2017 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #96 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 23–33 | 41.1% | #54 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2018 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #61 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #33 | 1,904 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2019 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #68 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 24–32 | 42.9% | #43 | 1,802 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2020 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #49 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #57 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2021 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #96 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #44 | 1,783 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2022 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,675 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #60 | 1,756 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–9 | 0.0% | #90 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #506 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #140 | 1,545 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #82 | 1,565 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #249 | 1,509 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #726 | 1,503 | 0 | 4 |