H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

Tennys Sandgren vs Joao Sousa H2H: 1-0

Tennys Sandgren holds a 1–0 lead over Joao Sousa in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tennys Sandgren leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tennys Sandgren won the 2021 Newport round of 32 6-4 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tennys Sandgren
USA Age 35 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Joao Sousa
POR Age 37 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tennys Sandgren #78 6-4 7-6(3) Joao Sousa #133 Match data Jul 15, 2021* R32 Newport ATP 250 Grass
Tennys Sandgren #49 6-3 6-0 Joao Sousa #74 Match data Sep 15, 2020* Q3 Q Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay
Joao Sousa #48 6-7(1) 6-3 6-4 Tennys Sandgren #62 Match data Oct 29, 2018 Q2 Q Paris Masters Masters 1000 Hard

2 qualifying meetings shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tennys Sandgren #1,243 #41 1,091 1,872 47 76 38.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Joao Sousa #954 #28 1,355 1,916 190 250 43.2% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tennys Sandgren Joao Sousa
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2008 1–1 50.0% #592 1,550 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2011 1–1 50.0% #192 1,507 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2012 3–4 42.9% #101 1,587 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2013 14–13 51.9% #49 1,797 0 1
25 2017 2–6 25.0% #96 1,498 0 0 2014 23–34 40.4% #54 1,738 0 1
26 2018 16–20 44.4% #61 1,662 0 0 2015 34–30 53.1% #33 1,904 0 2
27 2019 13–17 43.3% #68 1,763 0 1 2016 25–33 43.1% #43 1,805 0 2
28 2020 8–13 38.1% #49 1,758 0 1 2017 22–30 42.3% #57 1,735 0 2
29 2021 8–16 33.3% #96 1,686 0 1 2018 25–26 49.0% #44 1,782 0 3
30 2022 0–3 0.0% #265 1,673 0 1 2019 25–28 47.2% #60 1,757 0 3
31 — — — — — — — 2020 0–9 0.0% #90 1,607 0 3
32 2024 0–1 0.0% #506 1,645 0 1 2021 1–13 7.1% #140 1,534 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 2022 13–20 39.4% #82 1,565 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #249 1,510 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2024 0–1 0.0% #726 1,503 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tennys Sandgren Joao Sousa
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 12 9 21 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
25 2017 2 2 4 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 12 18 30 40.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 2018 9 10 19 47.4% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2015 18 17 35 51.4% 14 9 23 60.9% 2 4 6 33.3%
27 2019 8 12 20 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2016 12 20 32 37.5% 11 10 21 52.4% 2 3 5 40.0%
28 2020 7 10 17 41.2% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2017 10 14 24 41.7% 12 13 25 48.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
29 2021 4 9 13 30.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2018 15 17 32 46.9% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0%
30 2022 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2019 11 12 23 47.8% 10 12 22 45.5% 4 4 8 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 0 6 6 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
32 2024 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2021 1 3 4 25.0% 0 8 8 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 6 9 15 40.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 30 47 77 39.0% 9 21 30 30.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — 97 127 224 43.3% 79 98 177 44.6% 14 25 39 35.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 122/123 of Tennys Sandgren's and 436/440 of Joao Sousa's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tennys Sandgren Joao Sousa
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 2/2 3.5 1.5 58.6% 67.3% 65.4% 70.8% 31.3% 66.6% 39.5%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 2/2 3.0 1.0 60.3% 61.5% 41.4% 29.8% 58.3% 53.5% 34.6%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 7/7 2.1 3.1 59.5% 66.3% 47.7% 45.8% 29.7% 59.0% 40.6%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 27/27 2.9 2.3 61.8% 68.0% 46.5% 57.4% 38.5% 59.6% 36.1%
25 2017 8/8 4.6 1.5 62.3% 74.5% 45.2% 61.2% 33.5% 63.4% 32.4% 2014 56/57 2.7 2.1 60.3% 67.6% 48.1% 61.1% 37.5% 59.5% 35.1%
26 2018 36/36 8.3 2.5 60.9% 74.5% 49.9% 63.9% 46.0% 64.8% 34.2% 2015 64/64 3.0 2.1 59.2% 70.2% 51.9% 61.3% 42.7% 62.8% 37.0%
27 2019 30/30 9.0 2.9 60.3% 73.0% 47.9% 57.6% 37.4% 63.1% 35.0% 2016 56/58 3.4 2.2 63.4% 69.2% 47.7% 50.2% 42.9% 61.2% 36.5%
28 2020 21/21 11.7 3.2 62.5% 74.3% 50.1% 68.5% 35.4% 65.1% 32.4% 2017 52/52 4.5 2.8 58.5% 72.3% 49.8% 56.2% 38.4% 62.7% 36.5%
29 2021 23/24 7.8 2.7 58.7% 70.5% 45.3% 51.1% 34.4% 60.1% 32.7% 2018 51/51 4.2 2.4 60.3% 72.2% 49.4% 49.3% 35.8% 63.1% 37.5%
30 2022 3/3 3.0 4.3 54.3% 72.7% 42.1% 47.5% 10.0% 58.9% 28.8% 2019 53/53 5.1 1.8 61.7% 70.5% 49.4% 55.1% 38.5% 62.3% 34.5%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 9/9 4.3 2.9 57.1% 63.3% 48.5% 51.5% 35.3% 56.6% 31.7%
32 2024 1/1 13.0 0.0 65.8% 73.1% 40.7% 66.7% 25.0% 62.0% 29.5% 2021 13/14 2.7 2.2 59.1% 63.1% 44.6% 47.1% 31.2% 54.6% 33.4%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 33/33 3.6 2.4 62.3% 67.9% 49.2% 54.1% 34.8% 60.9% 37.2%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 10/10 2.1 2.0 59.4% 62.8% 43.7% 49.1% 35.6% 55.3% 31.3%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 1/1 2.0 2.0 56.3% 64.4% 51.4% 50.0% 25.0% 58.8% 34.7%
Career — 122/123 8.6 2.7 60.6% 73.3% 48.0% 60.2% 38.0% 63.3% 33.5% — 436/440 3.6 2.2 60.6% 69.3% 48.9% 55.0% 38.5% 61.2% 36.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tennys Sandgren Joao Sousa
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2009 1485 97.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2011 1469 97.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1551 109.7 -0.19 -0.49 1.182 54.2% — — — 50.0% +0.75 — 0–1 — +0.24
20 2012 1473 97.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1550 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2013 1465 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1543 103.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2014 1444 100.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1507 100.3 -2.74 +2.42 0.742 44.6% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.20
23 2015 1428 100.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1587 111.9 -2.10 -0.18 0.991 49.4% — +54 — 41.2% -0.77 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.38
24 2016 1429 106.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1797 138.5 -2.50 -0.67 0.896 48.2% -3 -191 — 47.9% -0.34 6–1 (86%) 1–2 (33%) 107.8 +0.54
25 2017 1499 115.3 -0.12 -0.71 0.884 47.3% -3 +27 — 22.2% -1.89 0–1 2–0 — -0.15 2014 1738 146.5 -2.75 -1.03 0.869 47.5% +1 -106 -36 39.7% -0.87 12–10 (55%) 14–11 (56%) 104.6 -0.16
26 2018 1663 141.8 +0.68 -1.43 0.972 49.7% +3 -100 — 44.4% -0.24 4–5 (44%) 9–14 (39%) 102.2 +0.49 2015 1904 152.2 -1.01 +1.38 0.995 49.9% -46 -72 -203 50.0% 0.00 15–9 (63%) 12–15 (44%) 105.2 -0.31
27 2019 1764 140.9 -0.64 -0.88 0.948 49.1% -62 — +8 47.1% -0.32 3–6 (33%) 9–14 (39%) 96.7 +0.01 2016 1806 151.2 -1.66 +0.21 0.941 48.8% +1 +17 -112 44.7% -0.45 9–13 (41%) 6–9 (40%) 95.1 +1.35
28 2020 1758 142.5 +1.13 -2.00 0.928 49.0% -36 -116 — 45.3% -0.20 3–7 (30%) 7–10 (41%) 96.1 -0.26 2017 1736 145.9 -0.81 -0.18 0.979 49.7% +18 +58 -117 46.3% -0.23 7–14 (33%) 8–12 (40%) 90.3 +2.40
29 2021 1687 130.0 -1.47 -2.11 0.820 47.0% -7 -100 +53 32.7% -1.20 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 98.0 -1.96 2018 1783 147.5 -0.33 +1.07 1.015 50.0% +38 -32 -147 46.7% -0.07 14–11 (56%) 12–10 (55%) 101.9 +1.17
30 2022 1674 119.3 -1.51 -2.44 0.700 44.1% -10 — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.51 2019 1758 141.2 -1.27 -1.02 0.916 48.4% +5 -7 -4 45.8% -0.41 13–10 (57%) 11–13 (46%) 101.4 -0.09
31 2023 1634 103.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1608 110.6 -2.88 -2.72 0.729 44.1% +41 +32 — 8.7% -2.35 0–1 0–3 (0%) — +0.04
32 2024 1645 105.5 +1.35 -1.03 0.776 45.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.01 2021 1534 111.8 -5.26 -2.49 0.736 44.3% +92 +15 — 17.1% -2.14 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 98.3 +0.37
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1565 131.7 -1.95 -0.02 0.952 48.8% +14 +70 +27 40.2% -0.41 6–6 (50%) 6–12 (33%) 99.0 +0.40
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1510 117.4 -3.91 -3.09 0.700 43.9% — +62 — 32.0% -1.80 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 102.3 -0.20
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1504 100.9 +0.27 +1.28 0.840 47.1% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.10
Career — 1872 138.2 -0.07 -1.50 0.913 48.6% -25 -89 +27 41.1% -0.57 12–23 (34%) 30–42 (42%) 95.4 -1.94 — 1917 144.3 -1.66 -0.16 0.928 48.6% +4 -9 -83 43.2% -0.48 86–82 (51%) 77–93 (45%) 99.0 +1.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.