H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Tennys Sandgren vs Jurgen Melzer
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Tennys Sandgren vs Jurgen Melzer.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 34
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 45
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tennys Sandgren | #1,243 | #41 | 1,091 | 1,870 | 47 | 75 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Jurgen Melzer | #1,552 | #8 | 3,055 | 2,024 | 326 | 303 | 51.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tennys Sandgren | Jurgen Melzer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #491 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #358 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #168 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #91 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #79 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #39 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #52 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #96 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #41 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2018 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #61 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #60 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2019 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #68 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #34 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2020 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #49 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #28 | 1,924 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2021 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #96 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 49–25 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,998 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2022 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,675 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #33 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #29 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #506 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #27 | 1,825 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #113 | 1,758 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #155 | 1,750 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #306 | 1,770 | 0 | 5 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,731 | 0 | 5 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #288 | 1,703 | 0 | 5 |