Tennys Sandgren
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Novak Djokovic | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jun 1, 2021 | H2H |
| Fabio Fognini | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jan 29, 2020 | H2H |
| Salvatore Caruso | 1 | 2 | 3 | May 19, 2021 | H2H |
| Gilles Simon | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 4, 2019 | H2H |
| Marcos Giron | 0 | 2 | 2 | Feb 17, 2022 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-10-23 00:00 UTC
Tennys Sandgren vs Rogerio Dutra Silva H2H: 0-1
Rogerio Dutra Silva holds a 1–0 lead over Tennys Sandgren in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rogerio Dutra Silva leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Rogerio Dutra Silva won the 2018 Sao Paulo round of 32 6-0 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rogerio Dutra Silva | 6-0 6-4 | Tennys Sandgren | Match data | Mar 1, 2018* | R32 | Sao Paulo | ATP 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tennys Sandgren | #1,243 | #41 | 1,091 | 1,872 | 47 | 76 | 38.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Rogerio Dutra Silva | #735 | #63 | 733 | 1,747 | 24 | 60 | 28.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tennys Sandgren | Rogerio Dutra Silva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #306 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #96 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2018 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #61 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #158 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2019 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #68 | 1,763 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2020 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #49 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2021 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #132 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2022 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,673 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #283 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #125 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #506 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #98 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #101 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #159 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Tennys Sandgren | Rogerio Dutra Silva | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2017 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2018 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 47.4% | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2010 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2019 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 2011 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2020 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2021 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2013 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 30 | 2022 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2024 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 6 | 11 | 17 | 35.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 30 | 47 | 77 | 39.0% | 9 | 21 | 30 | 30.0% | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | — | 8 | 17 | 25 | 32.0% | 16 | 38 | 54 | 29.6% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 122/123 of Tennys Sandgren's and 82/84 of Rogerio Dutra Silva's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Tennys Sandgren | Rogerio Dutra Silva | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 23 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 53.6% | 60.0% | 38.5% | 33.3% | — | 50.0% | 29.2% |
| 25 | 2017 | 8/8 | 4.6 | 1.5 | 62.3% | 74.5% | 45.2% | 61.2% | 33.5% | 63.4% | 32.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2018 | 36/36 | 8.3 | 2.5 | 60.9% | 74.5% | 49.9% | 63.9% | 46.0% | 64.8% | 34.2% | 2010 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 82.7% | 64.2% | 58.8% | 40.0% | 33.3% | 63.3% | 33.7% |
| 27 | 2019 | 30/30 | 9.0 | 2.9 | 60.3% | 73.0% | 47.9% | 57.6% | 37.4% | 63.1% | 35.0% | 2011 | 3/3 | 3.3 | 1.0 | 53.4% | 71.0% | 51.1% | 66.9% | 38.3% | 62.2% | 35.1% |
| 28 | 2020 | 21/21 | 11.7 | 3.2 | 62.5% | 74.3% | 50.1% | 68.5% | 35.4% | 65.1% | 32.4% | 2012 | 9/9 | 3.8 | 2.1 | 64.3% | 68.7% | 49.8% | 57.6% | 32.8% | 61.6% | 33.8% |
| 29 | 2021 | 23/24 | 7.8 | 2.7 | 58.7% | 70.5% | 45.3% | 51.1% | 34.4% | 60.1% | 32.7% | 2013 | 7/7 | 1.9 | 2.9 | 61.6% | 61.5% | 43.2% | 39.4% | 31.5% | 54.7% | 29.5% |
| 30 | 2022 | 3/3 | 3.0 | 4.3 | 54.3% | 72.7% | 42.1% | 47.5% | 10.0% | 58.9% | 28.8% | 2014 | 2/2 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 65.7% | 58.8% | 50.0% | 40.0% | 68.8% | 55.8% | 34.5% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 3/3 | 3.0 | 3.3 | 55.5% | 55.8% | 43.0% | 53.5% | 60.5% | 49.9% | 40.3% |
| 32 | 2024 | 1/1 | 13.0 | 0.0 | 65.8% | 73.1% | 40.7% | 66.7% | 25.0% | 62.0% | 29.5% | 2016 | 8/10 | 3.4 | 4.6 | 56.2% | 68.4% | 48.4% | 55.7% | 34.9% | 59.0% | 30.6% |
| 33 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 31/31 | 4.5 | 3.9 | 58.0% | 67.5% | 48.6% | 54.7% | 31.0% | 59.6% | 36.9% |
| 34 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 16/16 | 1.9 | 2.9 | 65.3% | 69.6% | 49.9% | 56.0% | 43.2% | 62.5% | 36.5% |
| 35 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 55.9% | 63.2% | 46.7% | 76.9% | 16.7% | 55.9% | 33.3% |
| Career | — | 122/123 | 8.6 | 2.7 | 60.6% | 73.3% | 48.0% | 60.2% | 38.0% | 63.3% | 33.5% | — | 82/84 | 3.3 | 3.2 | 60.4% | 66.9% | 48.4% | 54.0% | 35.8% | 59.4% | 35.1% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Tennys Sandgren | Rogerio Dutra Silva | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 2009 | 1485 | 97.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2011 | 1469 | 97.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2012 | 1473 | 97.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2013 | 1465 | 102.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2014 | 1444 | 100.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2015 | 1428 | 100.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1463 | 94.8 | -1.48 | -4.09 | 0.583 | 40.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.29 |
| 24 | 2016 | 1429 | 106.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2017 | 1499 | 115.3 | -0.12 | -0.71 | 0.884 | 47.3% | -3 | +27 | — | 22.2% | -1.89 | 0–1 | 2–0 | — | -0.15 | 2009 | 1435 | 97.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2018 | 1663 | 141.8 | +0.68 | -1.43 | 0.972 | 49.7% | +3 | -100 | — | 44.4% | -0.24 | 4–5 (44%) | 9–14 (39%) | 102.2 | +0.49 | 2010 | 1480 | 108.6 | -0.10 | -2.44 | 0.918 | 49.2% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.33 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.08 |
| 27 | 2019 | 1764 | 140.9 | -0.64 | -0.88 | 0.948 | 49.1% | -62 | — | +8 | 47.1% | -0.32 | 3–6 (33%) | 9–14 (39%) | 96.7 | +0.01 | 2011 | 1561 | 112.4 | +1.25 | -1.51 | 0.929 | 49.0% | — | — | — | 16.7% | -1.67 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.06 |
| 28 | 2020 | 1758 | 142.5 | +1.13 | -2.00 | 0.928 | 49.0% | -36 | -116 | — | 45.3% | -0.20 | 3–7 (30%) | 7–10 (41%) | 96.1 | -0.26 | 2012 | 1644 | 123.2 | -0.62 | -1.07 | 0.880 | 48.0% | — | +34 | — | 31.8% | -1.41 | 2–0 | 1–1 | — | +0.12 |
| 29 | 2021 | 1687 | 130.0 | -1.47 | -2.11 | 0.820 | 47.0% | -7 | -100 | +53 | 32.7% | -1.20 | 2–3 (40%) | 3–4 (43%) | 98.0 | -1.96 | 2013 | 1646 | 116.5 | -2.88 | -1.49 | 0.651 | 42.3% | — | -23 | — | 19.0% | -2.48 | 1–1 | 3–1 (75%) | — | -0.16 |
| 30 | 2022 | 1674 | 119.3 | -1.51 | -2.44 | 0.700 | 44.1% | -10 | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | -0.51 | 2014 | 1619 | 111.5 | +1.18 | -2.88 | 0.780 | 45.3% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -1.00 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.04 |
| 31 | 2023 | 1634 | 103.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1680 | 117.9 | -2.84 | -1.67 | 0.806 | 45.2% | — | +52 | — | 14.3% | -1.86 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.23 |
| 32 | 2024 | 1645 | 105.5 | +1.35 | -1.03 | 0.776 | 45.9% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.01 | 2016 | 1608 | 121.3 | -1.33 | -2.43 | 0.748 | 45.5% | +31 | +32 | — | 26.9% | -1.46 | 0–2 | 1–3 (25%) | — | -0.67 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1609 | 130.1 | -3.20 | +0.15 | 0.915 | 48.1% | +16 | +53 | — | 36.6% | -0.80 | 6–5 (55%) | 8–5 (62%) | 105.5 | +1.10 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1710 | 136.4 | -1.51 | +0.05 | 0.971 | 49.3% | -71 | +61 | — | 40.0% | -0.48 | 0–6 (0%) | 2–1 (67%) | 94.0 | -0.46 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1639 | 109.5 | +0.91 | -0.48 | 0.756 | 45.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | +0.06 |
| Career | — | 1872 | 138.2 | -0.07 | -1.50 | 0.913 | 48.6% | -25 | -89 | +27 | 41.1% | -0.57 | 12–23 (34%) | 30–42 (42%) | 95.4 | -1.94 | — | 1748 | 127.8 | -1.99 | -0.69 | 0.865 | 47.3% | +5 | +45 | — | 31.9% | -1.15 | 10–17 (37%) | 16–12 (57%) | 100.2 | +0.27 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Rogerio Dutra Silva
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Ramos-Vinolas | 0 | 4 | 4 | Feb 14, 2019 | H2H |
| Horacio Zeballos | 0 | 3 | 3 | Mar 3, 2018 | H2H |
| Alessandro Giannessi | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jul 22, 2017 | H2H |
| Novak Djokovic | 0 | 2 | 2 | May 29, 2018 | H2H |
| Radu Albot | 2 | 0 | 2 | May 3, 2018 | H2H |