H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Thiago Monteiro vs Alessandro Giannessi H2H: 1-0
Thiago Monteiro holds a 1–0 lead over Alessandro Giannessi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Thiago Monteiro leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Thiago Monteiro won the 2018 Quito fourth round 7-6(4) 4-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Brazil
Age 32
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 36
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2018* | Quito | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Thiago Monteiro | 7-6(4) 4-6 7-5 | Alessandro Giannessi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thiago Monteiro | #290 | #61 | 954 | 1,780 | 81 | 119 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Alessandro Giannessi | #1,488 | #84 | 610 | 1,639 | 12 | 22 | 35.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thiago Monteiro | Alessandro Giannessi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #135 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #260 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2018 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2019 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #89 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2020 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #128 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2021 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #89 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #154 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2022 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #71 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #160 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2023 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #122 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2024 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #109 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2025 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #197 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #185 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #262 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |