H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Thiemo de Bakker vs Daniel Brands H2H: 0-1

Daniel Brands holds a 1–0 lead over Thiemo de Bakker in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniel Brands leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniel Brands won the 2010 Bangkok round of 16 7-6(2) 1-6 7-6(7).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thiemo de Bakker
NED Age 37 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Daniel Brands
GER Age 39 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daniel Brands #70 4-6 7-6(0) 6-4 Thiemo de Bakker #97 Match data Apr 14, 2013 Q2 Q Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Daniel Brands #123 4-6 6-3 6-4 Thiemo de Bakker #187 Match data Aug 27, 2012 Q1 Q US Open Grand Slam Hard
Daniel Brands #81 7-6(2) 1-6 7-6(7) Thiemo de Bakker #47 Match data Oct 1, 2010* R16 Bangkok ATP 250 Hard

2 qualifying meetings shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Thiemo de Bakker #1,382 #40 1,010 1,853 54 80 40.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Daniel Brands #1,055 #51 896 1,886 58 93 38.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thiemo de Bakker Daniel Brands
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2006 1–1 50.0% #464 1,512 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2007 1–4 20.0% #444 1,502 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2008 1–1 50.0% #249 1,531 0 0 2007 1–1 50.0% #220 1,491 0 0
20 2009 2–3 40.0% #96 1,612 0 0 2008 1–4 20.0% #150 1,539 0 0
21 2010 26–23 53.1% #43 1,763 0 0 2009 7–5 58.3% #92 1,645 0 0
22 2011 2–11 15.4% #223 1,665 0 0 2010 9–19 32.1% #104 1,670 0 0
23 2012 0–2 0.0% #124 1,642 0 0 2011 4–11 26.7% #110 1,690 0 0
24 2013 7–10 41.2% #146 1,683 0 0 2012 5–8 38.5% #153 1,688 0 0
25 2014 7–6 53.8% #144 1,665 0 0 2013 23–23 50.0% #54 1,809 0 0
26 2015 2–5 28.6% #99 1,617 0 0 2014 2–11 15.4% #329 1,713 0 0
27 2016 5–12 29.4% #257 1,582 0 0 2015 2–1 66.7% #159 1,729 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2016 2–4 33.3% #168 1,660 0 0
29 2018 0–1 0.0% #242 1,558 0 0 2017 1–4 20.0% #320 1,664 0 0
30 2019 0–1 0.0% #511 1,536 0 0 2018 0–1 0.0% #182 1,616 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2019 1–1 50.0% #465 1,605 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Thiemo de Bakker Daniel Brands
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2006 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2007 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 2009 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2008 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
21 2010 16 16 32 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 2009 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2011 1 6 7 14.3% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 2010 4 12 16 25.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 2 6 66.7%
23 2012 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 4 5 9 44.4% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2013 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2012 2 4 6 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
25 2014 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 2013 11 12 23 47.8% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0%
26 2015 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2014 2 9 11 18.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2016 3 7 10 30.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 2015 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2018 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2017 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2019 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2018 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 27 45 72 37.5% 20 24 44 45.5% 7 11 18 38.9% — 30 49 79 38.0% 21 34 55 38.2% 7 10 17 41.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 133/134 of Thiemo de Bakker's and 151/151 of Daniel Brands's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Thiemo de Bakker Daniel Brands
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2006 2/2 3.5 3.0 54.6% 74.1% 49.1% 72.9% 41.7% 62.8% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 5/5 8.2 1.2 65.7% 71.8% 58.9% 57.1% 49.6% 67.3% 25.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 2/2 7.5 1.0 55.0% 73.1% 56.3% 68.6% 31.3% 66.0% 34.0% 2007 2/2 7.5 2.0 64.3% 87.8% 59.9% 100.0% 16.7% 77.8% 23.5%
20 2009 5/5 5.8 1.4 62.2% 70.1% 51.0% 61.2% 36.1% 62.1% 36.0% 2008 5/5 8.0 4.4 61.7% 75.9% 40.5% 48.6% 34.2% 63.2% 30.6%
21 2010 49/49 9.8 1.6 61.0% 73.7% 53.5% 60.8% 41.7% 65.8% 35.9% 2009 12/12 8.3 3.3 67.9% 76.6% 51.4% 69.8% 37.8% 68.6% 34.8%
22 2011 13/13 6.5 2.8 54.5% 68.0% 48.7% 53.9% 21.4% 59.2% 28.0% 2010 28/28 9.3 3.0 64.5% 69.9% 53.9% 57.0% 31.5% 63.9% 29.5%
23 2012 2/2 5.0 1.0 55.3% 60.2% 42.0% 48.5% 100.0% 52.1% 28.9% 2011 15/15 7.0 3.0 68.7% 68.6% 47.4% 57.3% 31.0% 61.7% 28.0%
24 2013 17/17 6.2 2.0 60.6% 69.6% 45.6% 62.0% 41.5% 60.2% 34.7% 2012 13/13 11.1 3.8 63.0% 76.4% 48.5% 49.4% 35.6% 66.2% 31.8%
25 2014 12/13 8.7 2.2 57.1% 77.0% 47.1% 64.2% 26.3% 64.1% 33.6% 2013 46/46 8.5 2.2 66.8% 72.9% 53.0% 57.6% 35.3% 66.2% 33.4%
26 2015 7/7 9.0 2.0 54.3% 74.6% 49.2% 59.1% 37.8% 63.0% 34.9% 2014 13/13 9.2 1.8 69.7% 68.9% 50.3% 62.1% 22.8% 62.9% 29.5%
27 2016 17/17 7.2 1.5 60.3% 70.5% 47.1% 49.0% 36.1% 61.3% 33.8% 2015 3/3 7.3 3.3 54.4% 75.4% 62.8% 43.8% 27.8% 71.2% 37.0%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 6/6 12.3 5.0 64.1% 72.7% 51.2% 59.5% 53.3% 64.7% 32.0%
29 2018 1/1 4.0 3.0 71.7% 60.6% 15.4% 33.3% — 47.8% 15.8% 2017 5/5 7.0 5.2 64.9% 70.4% 41.0% 62.4% 23.2% 59.4% 29.4%
30 2019 1/1 9.0 4.0 58.2% 68.8% 17.4% 69.2% — 47.3% 21.4% 2018 1/1 13.0 4.0 71.7% 70.4% 64.3% 66.7% 0.0% 68.7% 28.6%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 2/2 8.0 3.0 66.9% 67.0% 55.3% 66.7% 43.8% 63.0% 35.5%
Career — 133/134 8.1 1.8 59.5% 72.0% 49.7% 58.8% 37.6% 63.0% 33.7% — 151/151 8.8 3.0 66.0% 72.3% 51.4% 58.5% 33.1% 65.1% 31.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Thiemo de Bakker Daniel Brands
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2006 1513 104.7 -0.21 +0.15 1.055 51.5% — — — 60.0% +0.20 0–1 — — -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 1502 115.2 -0.81 -3.06 0.782 47.1% — — — 35.7% -0.79 0–2 4–3 (57%) — -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 1532 107.0 -0.17 -0.92 1.000 50.8% — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 0–1 — +0.11 2007 1492 106.0 -2.82 -3.49 1.057 51.7% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — 1–2 (33%) — +0.05
20 2009 1612 119.7 +1.05 -2.08 0.949 49.0% — — — 41.7% -0.58 1–1 2–2 (50%) — 0.00 2008 1540 111.5 -1.86 -1.37 0.830 46.7% — +37 — 25.0% -1.50 0–1 — — +0.09
21 2010 1764 149.9 +1.79 +0.33 1.050 50.7% -70 +14 -122 50.8% +0.25 7–5 (58%) 11–16 (41%) — +0.27 2009 1645 119.5 +2.51 -1.77 1.108 51.4% — +44 — 53.3% +0.30 3–3 (50%) 4–3 (57%) — +0.22
22 2011 1665 125.5 -1.60 -4.74 0.686 44.4% -43 +82 — 27.0% -1.97 2–4 (33%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.54 2010 1671 129.6 +0.41 -4.53 0.817 46.9% -109 -45 +44 34.3% -1.14 3–4 (43%) 9–9 (50%) — -1.34
23 2012 1642 103.3 -3.01 -3.23 0.604 41.7% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — 0–1 — -0.03 2011 1691 120.3 -1.58 -5.51 0.732 45.6% -31 -86 — 27.8% -1.61 2–2 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.41
24 2013 1684 129.6 -1.39 -1.41 0.871 47.6% -45 +78 -77 37.8% -0.81 2–1 (67%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.74 2012 1689 117.4 +1.52 -2.94 0.940 48.7% +10 -50 — 45.5% -0.36 1–3 (25%) 6–6 (50%) — +0.51
25 2014 1665 127.0 +0.17 -1.17 0.935 48.9% +12 — — 48.1% -0.19 2–1 (67%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.61 2013 1809 149.3 +2.79 -2.73 0.988 49.7% -11 +4 -192 47.8% -0.11 7–5 (58%) 9–9 (50%) — -2.24
26 2015 1618 116.8 +1.14 -1.79 0.944 49.0% — +111 — 41.2% -0.17 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.19 2014 1713 128.9 -0.97 -3.58 0.796 46.4% +3 — — 33.3% -1.28 0–6 (0%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.62
27 2016 1583 124.7 -1.66 -1.23 0.874 47.5% +82 +70 — 34.9% -1.05 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.71 2015 1729 122.1 +0.44 +1.03 1.284 52.5% +26 — — 57.1% +0.14 1–0 1–0 — -0.11
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1661 117.0 +0.34 -3.35 0.907 48.9% +50 — — 42.1% -0.32 0–1 2–3 (40%) — +0.06
29 2018 1558 101.5 -1.76 -3.04 0.303 33.3% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.06 2017 1665 110.8 -1.31 -3.25 0.724 45.2% — — — 16.7% -1.42 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.08
30 2019 1536 99.8 +0.16 -1.51 0.406 36.1% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.04 2018 1616 97.9 +1.38 +0.15 0.912 48.0% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–0 — +0.04
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1605 109.1 +0.20 -3.04 0.961 49.1% — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 1–1 — -0.28
Career — 1854 134.5 +0.13 -1.17 0.910 48.5% -29 +62 -104 41.6% -0.54 18–21 (46%) 33–36 (48%) 101.5 -0.74 — 1886 131.0 +0.91 -3.27 0.900 48.3% -25 -9 -63 40.4% -0.64 18–26 (41%) 43–43 (50%) 98.0 -2.62

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.