H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Thomas Enqvist vs David Wheaton H2H: 4-1

Thomas Enqvist holds a 4–1 lead over David Wheaton in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Thomas Enqvist leads 3–0 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Thomas Enqvist won the 1996 Indianapolis fourth round 6-4 6-3.

SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
4 1
5 main draw meetings
USA Age 57 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 12, 1996 Indianapolis ATP 250 R16 Hard Thomas Enqvist #12 6-4 6-3 David Wheaton #141 Match data
Aug 10, 1995* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Thomas Enqvist #13 6-2 7-6(4) David Wheaton #28 Match data
May 13, 1995* Pinehurst ATP 250 SF Clay Thomas Enqvist #19 7-5 6-4 David Wheaton #29 Match data
Mar 16, 1995* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Thomas Enqvist #20 7-5 6-4 David Wheaton #28 Match data
May 25, 1994* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay David Wheaton #104 7-6(5) 6-0 6-3 Thomas Enqvist #63 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 422 281 60.0% 0 3 0 0 16 19
David Wheaton #874 #12 1,506 1,984 231 190 54.9% 0 0 1 0 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Enqvist David Wheaton
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0
17 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0 1986 0–1 0.0% #785 1,492 0 0
18 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,734 0 1 1987 3–3 50.0% #345 1,525 0 0
19 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,712 0 2 1988 0–3 0.0% #441 1,494 0 0
20 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,761 0 2 1989 18–16 52.9% #66 1,683 0 0
21 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,982 0 7 1990 35–20 63.6% #27 1,873 0 1
22 1996 49–25 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10 1991 33–19 63.5% #17 1,955 0 2
23 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,873 0 11 1992 30–23 56.6% #44 1,804 0 2
24 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,869 0 13 1993 27–25 51.9% #54 1,730 0 2
25 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16 1994 28–18 60.9% #39 1,782 0 3
26 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18 1995 28–24 53.8% #44 1,705 0 3
27 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,848 0 18 1996 12–15 44.4% #131 1,704 0 3
28 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,792 0 19 1997 10–8 55.6% #148 1,704 0 3
29 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,710 0 19 1998 6–10 37.5% #229 1,620 0 3
30 2004 12–19 38.7% #72 1,627 0 19 1999 0–2 0.0% #565 1,582 0 3
31 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,589 0 19 2000 1–3 25.0% #313 1,562 0 3