H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Thomas Enqvist vs Davide Sanguinetti H2H: 1-1

Thomas Enqvist and Davide Sanguinetti are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Thomas Enqvist leads 1–0 on clay, while Davide Sanguinetti leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Davide Sanguinetti won the 2003 Metz third round 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Enqvist
SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Davide Sanguinetti
ITA Age 53 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 2, 2003* Metz ATP 250 R32 Hard Davide Sanguinetti #98 7-5 6-3 Thomas Enqvist #158 Match data
Apr 26, 2001* Barcelona ATP 250 R32 Clay Thomas Enqvist #14 6-3 6-0 Davide Sanguinetti #54 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 422 281 60.0% 0 3 0 0 16 19
Davide Sanguinetti #1,080 #42 874 1,771 157 233 40.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Enqvist Davide Sanguinetti
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,734 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,712 0 2 — — — — — — —
20 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,761 0 2 — — — — — — —
21 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,982 0 7 1994 0–2 0.0% #177 1,482 0 0
22 1996 49–25 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10 1995 0–3 0.0% #290 1,455 0 0
23 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,873 0 11 — — — — — — —
24 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,869 0 13 1997 5–11 31.2% #95 1,497 0 0
25 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16 1998 29–27 51.8% #48 1,675 0 0
26 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18 1999 8–23 25.8% #120 1,560 0 0
27 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,848 0 18 2000 17–21 44.7% #65 1,639 0 0
28 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,792 0 19 2001 10–27 27.0% #91 1,528 0 0
29 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,710 0 19 2002 22–21 51.2% #46 1,620 0 2
30 2004 12–19 38.7% #72 1,627 0 19 2003 16–21 43.2% #65 1,620 0 2
31 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,589 0 19 2004 11–20 35.5% #110 1,588 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2005 25–25 50.0% #44 1,710 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2006 9–24 27.3% #107 1,547 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2007 5–8 38.5% #270 1,519 0 2