H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Thomas Enqvist vs Davide Sanguinetti H2H: 1-1

Thomas Enqvist and Davide Sanguinetti are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Thomas Enqvist leads 1–0 on clay, while Davide Sanguinetti leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Davide Sanguinetti won the 2003 Metz round of 32 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Enqvist
SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Davide Sanguinetti
ITA Age 54 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Davide Sanguinetti #98 7-5 6-3 Thomas Enqvist #158 Match data Oct 2, 2003* R32 Metz ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Thomas Enqvist #14 6-3 6-0 Davide Sanguinetti #54 Match data Apr 26, 2001* R32 Barcelona Open ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 424 283 60.0% 0 3 0 2 14 19
Davide Sanguinetti #1,080 #42 874 1,772 157 233 40.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Enqvist Davide Sanguinetti
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,736 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,713 0 2 — — — — — — —
20 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,762 0 2 — — — — — — —
21 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,985 0 7 1994 0–2 0.0% #177 1,482 0 0
22 1996 51–26 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10 1995 0–3 0.0% #290 1,455 0 0
23 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,880 0 11 — — — — — — —
24 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,870 0 13 1997 5–11 31.2% #95 1,497 0 0
25 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16 1998 29–27 51.8% #48 1,675 0 0
26 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18 1999 8–23 25.8% #120 1,560 0 0
27 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,847 0 18 2000 17–21 44.7% #65 1,638 0 0
28 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,804 0 19 2001 10–27 27.0% #91 1,530 0 0
29 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,712 0 19 2002 22–21 51.2% #46 1,621 0 2
30 2004 12–20 37.5% #72 1,623 0 19 2003 16–21 43.2% #65 1,620 0 2
31 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,588 0 19 2004 11–20 35.5% #110 1,591 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2005 25–25 50.0% #44 1,709 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2006 9–24 27.3% #107 1,547 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2007 5–8 38.5% #270 1,519 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Thomas Enqvist Davide Sanguinetti
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 13 11 24 54.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 21 11 32 65.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1995 44 13 57 77.2% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 1994 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1996 36 15 51 70.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 5 17 70.6% 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1997 19 12 31 61.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 15 7 22 68.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1998 20 7 27 74.1% 7 3 10 70.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1997 0 2 2 0.0% 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — — — — —
25 1999 34 14 48 70.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1998 5 7 12 41.7% 17 16 33 51.5% 4 1 5 80.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
26 2000 32 14 46 69.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 1999 2 5 7 28.6% 4 12 16 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
27 2001 16 11 27 59.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 2000 10 10 20 50.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 2002 19 10 29 65.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2001 5 13 18 27.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 4 4 0.0%
29 2003 11 16 27 40.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2002 15 10 25 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
30 2004 7 14 21 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 12 12 24 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
31 2005 6 7 13 46.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2004 8 11 19 42.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 10 11 21 47.6% 10 8 18 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 6 13 19 31.6% 2 7 9 22.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
Career — 286 161 447 64.0% 49 53 102 48.0% 19 21 40 47.5% 70 48 118 59.3% — 78 100 178 43.8% 45 83 128 35.2% 20 27 47 42.6% 14 23 37 37.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 605/705 of Thomas Enqvist's and 355/390 of Davide Sanguinetti's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Thomas Enqvist Davide Sanguinetti
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1991 5/6 5.4 4.8 45.5% 72.9% 56.0% 57.6% 42.2% 63.8% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 24/25 6.2 5.3 54.7% 72.3% 48.2% 51.1% 44.8% 61.5% 40.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 35/41 5.7 5.6 54.1% 72.8% 42.5% 53.3% 40.6% 58.9% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 37/42 7.2 5.1 54.5% 74.3% 45.8% 52.9% 43.7% 61.3% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1995 75/85 6.9 4.2 55.6% 76.9% 50.5% 57.6% 47.7% 65.5% 42.5% 1994 2/2 5.0 4.0 40.8% 71.3% 40.4% 63.5% 27.5% 52.8% 41.3%
22 1996 62/77 7.1 4.2 56.6% 76.5% 48.7% 53.3% 46.6% 64.8% 41.3% 1995 3/3 5.3 1.7 59.9% 74.9% 43.9% 41.3% 5.6% 62.5% 28.3%
23 1997 48/56 8.1 3.2 56.0% 78.5% 55.2% 57.5% 44.3% 68.0% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1998 42/50 10.4 3.6 56.0% 78.5% 53.9% 60.9% 47.0% 67.6% 39.0% 1997 14/16 5.7 2.4 52.5% 68.6% 45.1% 59.9% 43.6% 57.4% 40.5%
25 1999 56/70 8.4 4.1 56.7% 77.3% 52.5% 56.4% 45.6% 66.5% 39.4% 1998 45/56 5.8 2.8 54.2% 72.2% 46.6% 55.4% 42.9% 60.0% 39.8%
26 2000 63/74 8.3 4.7 55.3% 77.4% 53.6% 61.7% 39.5% 66.5% 40.1% 1999 26/31 4.2 2.5 53.3% 66.6% 46.0% 55.1% 42.2% 56.9% 36.9%
27 2001 40/52 7.6 5.1 54.0% 74.5% 50.5% 65.8% 38.9% 63.4% 39.7% 2000 32/38 7.4 2.7 53.2% 73.9% 47.0% 57.2% 42.4% 61.1% 38.8%
28 2002 34/40 7.6 5.5 50.4% 76.6% 50.2% 54.1% 49.2% 63.5% 39.8% 2001 34/37 6.0 3.5 56.1% 69.8% 46.0% 53.6% 39.3% 59.2% 35.5%
29 2003 34/36 8.3 5.5 54.8% 75.5% 48.8% 53.9% 45.5% 63.5% 34.5% 2002 36/43 6.4 2.6 57.2% 68.2% 48.3% 53.9% 47.0% 59.7% 37.3%
30 2004 31/32 7.9 5.5 54.9% 74.1% 47.0% 55.4% 42.0% 61.8% 34.6% 2003 36/37 4.5 2.4 58.7% 69.4% 48.3% 59.5% 39.6% 60.5% 36.2%
31 2005 19/19 8.1 4.7 51.9% 73.7% 49.2% 65.5% 42.6% 61.8% 37.8% 2004 31/31 4.1 2.5 59.6% 66.5% 49.2% 52.1% 37.9% 59.5% 36.1%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 50/50 5.4 1.6 57.2% 70.8% 49.8% 55.9% 39.5% 61.9% 37.1%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 33/33 4.9 2.2 57.1% 68.7% 49.6% 54.9% 31.7% 60.6% 34.7%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 13/13 5.3 2.2 59.4% 67.1% 44.4% 58.0% 39.6% 58.0% 35.1%
Career — 605/707 7.7 4.6 55.0% 76.1% 50.3% 57.2% 44.3% 64.5% 39.6% — 355/390 5.5 2.5 56.2% 69.7% 47.6% 55.6% 40.1% 59.9% 37.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Thomas Enqvist Davide Sanguinetti
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1989 1484 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1990 1480 105.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 1467 113.2 +0.83 +1.32 1.128 51.8% +54 — — 33.3% -0.33 0–3 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 1736 143.0 +1.05 +1.79 1.050 51.1% +5 -200 — 56.7% +0.40 7–2 (78%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 1714 135.6 -1.12 +1.54 0.961 49.3% +26 -227 — 45.7% -0.17 7–6 (54%) 4–9 (31%) — -0.87 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 1763 142.0 +0.37 +0.31 1.012 50.3% +20 — — 50.0% +0.03 10–4 (71%) 9–11 (45%) — +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1995 1986 163.3 +3.55 +4.87 1.232 53.7% +20 -396 -453 68.5% +1.29 19–6 (76%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.31 1994 1483 107.3 -0.36 +1.47 0.876 46.8% — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — -0.11
22 1996 1980 153.5 +2.88 +3.65 1.173 53.1% +30 -418 -435 64.7% +0.99 10–9 (53%) 18–12 (60%) — +2.31 1995 1455 106.3 -0.79 -2.82 0.755 45.0% — — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — -0.04
23 1997 1880 152.3 +4.95 +2.12 1.234 53.5% +25 -302 — 62.7% +0.98 8–9 (47%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1998 1870 154.5 +4.80 +2.35 1.203 53.2% +16 -139 -212 63.6% +1.12 15–6 (71%) 8–14 (36%) — -1.78 1997 1498 126.0 -1.52 +0.15 0.950 48.9% — +63 — 42.5% -0.65 2–6 (25%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.38
25 1999 1914 157.9 +4.04 +2.58 1.178 52.9% +37 -203 -259 62.2% +0.83 11–9 (55%) 15–12 (56%) — -1.56 1998 1676 129.3 -1.67 +1.12 0.996 49.8% -85 -33 +42 51.4% +0.12 7–10 (41%) 8–11 (42%) — +3.09
26 2000 1907 156.1 +4.14 +2.79 1.197 53.2% +29 -125 -211 65.3% +1.07 18–10 (64%) 18–15 (55%) — -0.24 1999 1560 123.1 -3.03 -1.02 0.856 47.3% +21 +5 — 36.1% -0.95 2–10 (17%) 6–9 (40%) — -0.62
27 2001 1848 146.2 +1.04 +1.56 1.084 51.4% +10 -28 -76 56.6% +0.52 11–7 (61%) 10–13 (43%) — +0.65 2000 1639 131.0 -0.65 +1.27 0.998 49.8% +4 -99 +25 45.2% -0.18 8–7 (53%) 8–6 (57%) — -0.27
28 2002 1804 148.3 +1.76 +2.14 1.089 51.9% +110 -50 -67 56.0% +0.54 8–4 (67%) 10–7 (59%) — +0.01 2001 1530 122.7 -2.53 -2.07 0.871 47.6% -6 -17 +99 34.0% -0.91 5–9 (36%) 5–14 (26%) — +0.78
29 2003 1712 135.7 +0.99 -1.33 0.944 48.9% +66 -44 — 37.2% -0.56 4–6 (40%) 6–13 (32%) — -2.28 2002 1621 139.4 -1.91 +0.49 0.924 48.7% +54 -99 -32 50.0% -0.05 12–7 (63%) 11–10 (52%) — +0.85
30 2004 1623 132.3 -0.69 -1.15 0.905 48.6% +21 +44 +89 45.8% -0.26 2–10 (17%) 10–11 (48%) — -0.37 2003 1621 125.3 -1.40 -0.39 0.915 48.5% +60 -134 -67 42.2% -0.40 5–3 (63%) 7–11 (39%) — +0.67
31 2005 1589 135.5 -1.21 +0.62 0.989 50.1% +67 — — 43.8% -0.23 0–5 (0%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.73 2004 1591 122.1 -2.81 -0.69 0.891 48.0% +49 -138 -34 41.3% -0.75 4–8 (33%) 5–6 (45%) — +0.44
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1710 134.9 -0.38 -0.85 0.974 49.5% -28 -90 -81 48.5% -0.04 11–6 (65%) 10–12 (45%) — +0.13
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1548 123.8 -1.74 -1.80 0.880 47.7% +25 +2 +57 34.5% -0.88 4–6 (40%) 7–11 (39%) — +0.34
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1520 110.9 -3.01 -0.31 0.835 46.7% +46 — — 42.9% -0.43 3–1 (75%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.09
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1510 99.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1493 99.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2013 156.4 +2.42 +2.14 1.113 52.0% +32 -167 -178 58.0% +0.62 130–96 (58%) 139–150 (48%) 98.2 -0.73 — 1773 132.7 -1.71 -0.37 0.924 48.5% +16 -39 +4 43.2% -0.42 63–75 (46%) 72–95 (43%) 97.4 +1.27

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.