H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Tim Smyczek vs Bobby Reynolds H2H: 1-0
Tim Smyczek holds a 1–0 lead over Bobby Reynolds in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tim Smyczek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tim Smyczek won the 2012 US Open first round 1-6 6-4 6-2 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 38
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 44
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2012* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Tim Smyczek | 1-6 6-4 6-2 4-6 6-4 | Bobby Reynolds | Match data |
| Jan 10, 2011 | Auckland | ATP 250 | Q2 | Hard | Bobby Reynolds | 7-6(4) 6-3 | Tim Smyczek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tim Smyczek | #862 | #68 | 688 | 1,768 | 43 | 85 | 33.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bobby Reynolds | #1,116 | #63 | 1,146 | 1,781 | 28 | 72 | 28.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tim Smyczek | Bobby Reynolds | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #475 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #288 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #171 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #92 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #273 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #190 | 1,410 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #128 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #111 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #89 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #70 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #115 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #332 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #109 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #163 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2016 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #140 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #127 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2017 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #130 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #148 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2018 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #179 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #355 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |