H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Tim Wilkison vs Zeljko Franulovic H2H: 0-1
Zeljko Franulovic holds a 1–0 lead over Tim Wilkison in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Zeljko Franulovic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Zeljko Franulovic won the 1979 Hamburg second round 6-2 6-7 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 66
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 79
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 1979* | Hamburg | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Zeljko Franulovic | 6-2 6-7 6-1 | Tim Wilkison | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tim Wilkison | #1,167 | #23 | 269 | 1,894 | 294 | 298 | 49.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Zeljko Franulovic | #616 | #30 | 0 | 2,014 | 407 | 307 | 57.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tim Wilkison | Zeljko Franulovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1977 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #114 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1978 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #54 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1979 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1980 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #95 | 1,684 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1981 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #71 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | 1968 | 21–21 | 50.0% | — | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1982 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #61 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 | 1969 | 47–20 | 70.1% | — | 1,864 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1983 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #88 | 1,678 | 0 | 4 | 1970 | 64–29 | 68.8% | — | 1,934 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 1984 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #39 | 1,765 | 0 | 5 | 1971 | 59–28 | 67.8% | — | 1,921 | 0 | 11 |
| 25 | 1985 | 36–28 | 56.2% | #44 | 1,807 | 0 | 6 | 1972 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 11 |
| 26 | 1986 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #29 | 1,771 | 0 | 6 | 1973 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #70 | 1,706 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | 1987 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #55 | 1,729 | 0 | 6 | 1974 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #77 | 1,657 | 0 | 11 |
| 28 | 1988 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #121 | 1,672 | 0 | 6 | 1975 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #68 | 1,747 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 1989 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,599 | 0 | 6 | 1976 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #44 | 1,916 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | 1990 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #210 | 1,540 | 0 | 6 | 1977 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #42 | 1,762 | 0 | 13 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #38 | 1,800 | 0 | 13 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #97 | 1,768 | 0 | 13 |
| 33 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1178 | 1,522 | 0 | 6 | 1980 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #86 | 1,678 | 0 | 13 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #100 | 1,648 | 0 | 13 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,616 | 0 | 13 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,567 | 0 | 13 |