H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Tobias Kamke vs Daniel Brands H2H: 0-1

Daniel Brands holds a 1–0 lead over Tobias Kamke in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniel Brands leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Daniel Brands won the 2013 Munich Open first round 5-7 6-4 6-3.

GER Age 40 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 1
1 main draw meetings
GER Age 39 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tobias Kamke #132 6-3 6-2 Daniel Brands #148 Match data Oct 17, 2016 Q2 Q Stockholm Open ATP 250 Hard
Daniel Brands #69 5-7 6-4 6-3 Tobias Kamke #76 Match data May 2, 2013* R32 Munich Open ATP 250 Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tobias Kamke #1,114 #64 744 1,766 62 101 38.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Daniel Brands #1,055 #51 896 1,886 58 93 38.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tobias Kamke Daniel Brands
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2007 1–1 50.0% #220 1,491 0 0
20 2008 1–4 20.0% #150 1,539 0 0
21 2007 0–1 0.0% #210 1,502 0 0 2009 7–5 58.3% #92 1,645 0 0
22 2008 0–1 0.0% #243 1,508 0 0 2010 9–19 32.1% #104 1,670 0 0
23 2011 4–11 26.7% #110 1,690 0 0
24 2010 7–8 46.7% #67 1,639 0 0 2012 5–8 38.5% #153 1,688 0 0
25 2011 15–23 39.5% #96 1,738 0 0 2013 23–23 50.0% #54 1,809 0 0
26 2012 6–18 25.0% #98 1,628 0 0 2014 2–11 15.4% #329 1,713 0 0
27 2013 17–21 44.7% #74 1,731 0 0 2015 2–1 66.7% #159 1,729 0 0
28 2014 9–16 36.0% #97 1,669 0 0 2016 2–4 33.3% #168 1,660 0 0
29 2015 1–5 16.7% #277 1,583 0 0 2017 1–4 20.0% #320 1,664 0 0
30 2016 5–5 50.0% #118 1,707 0 0 2018 0–1 0.0% #182 1,616 0 0
31 2017 2–2 50.0% #233 1,617 0 0 2019 1–1 50.0% #465 1,605 0 0
33 2019 0–1 0.0% #242 1,566 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tobias Kamke Daniel Brands
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 2007 1 1 2 50.0%
20 2008 1 4 5 20.0%
21 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2008 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 4 12 16 25.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 2 6 66.7%
23 2011 4 5 9 44.4% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2010 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2012 2 4 6 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9%
25 2011 7 14 21 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 2013 11 12 23 47.8% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0%
26 2012 5 11 16 31.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2014 2 9 11 18.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2013 10 11 21 47.6% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 2015 2 1 3 66.7%
28 2014 4 10 14 28.6% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2016 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2015 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2017 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2016 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2018 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2017 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2019 1 1 2 50.0%
33 2019 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 35 61 96 36.5% 16 27 43 37.2% 11 13 24 45.8% 30 49 79 38.0% 21 34 55 38.2% 7 10 17 41.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tobias Kamke Daniel Brands
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 —/— 2007 2/2 7.5 2.0 64.3% 87.8% 59.9% 100.0% 16.7% 77.8% 23.5%
20 —/— 2008 5/5 8.0 4.4 61.7% 75.9% 40.5% 48.6% 34.2% 63.2% 30.6%
21 2007 1/1 0.0 6.0 47.2% 56.0% 35.7% 16.7% 45.3% 17.6% 2009 12/12 8.3 3.3 67.9% 76.6% 51.4% 69.8% 37.8% 68.6% 34.8%
22 2008 1/1 3.0 11.0 58.3% 64.9% 45.3% 25.0% 33.3% 56.7% 30.1% 2010 28/28 9.3 3.0 64.5% 69.9% 53.9% 57.0% 31.5% 63.9% 29.5%
23 —/— 2011 15/15 7.0 3.0 68.7% 68.6% 47.4% 57.3% 31.0% 61.7% 28.0%
24 2010 15/15 1.8 3.3 59.0% 65.8% 48.0% 56.5% 35.6% 58.8% 39.1% 2012 13/13 11.1 3.8 63.0% 76.4% 48.5% 49.4% 35.6% 66.2% 31.8%
25 2011 38/38 2.3 3.5 57.2% 65.9% 50.9% 55.5% 39.3% 59.5% 38.5% 2013 46/46 8.5 2.2 66.8% 72.9% 53.0% 57.6% 35.3% 66.2% 33.4%
26 2012 24/24 1.4 4.6 57.4% 61.6% 45.8% 47.2% 39.2% 54.8% 40.4% 2014 13/13 9.2 1.8 69.7% 68.9% 50.3% 62.1% 22.8% 62.9% 29.5%
27 2013 38/38 2.2 2.6 60.4% 66.9% 49.5% 60.7% 46.9% 60.0% 39.2% 2015 3/3 7.3 3.3 54.4% 75.4% 62.8% 43.8% 27.8% 71.2% 37.0%
28 2014 25/25 2.4 3.3 61.0% 66.2% 51.7% 60.8% 36.4% 60.4% 34.6% 2016 6/6 12.3 5.0 64.1% 72.7% 51.2% 59.5% 53.3% 64.7% 32.0%
29 2015 6/6 2.2 2.5 56.5% 61.9% 46.0% 38.6% 45.4% 54.5% 37.5% 2017 5/5 7.0 5.2 64.9% 70.4% 41.0% 62.4% 23.2% 59.4% 29.4%
30 2016 10/10 1.0 3.1 61.2% 64.4% 50.3% 45.7% 44.5% 58.8% 39.3% 2018 1/1 13.0 4.0 71.7% 70.4% 64.3% 66.7% 0.0% 68.7% 28.6%
31 2017 4/4 2.3 3.5 57.0% 73.4% 51.3% 60.9% 58.5% 64.2% 39.7% 2019 2/2 8.0 3.0 66.9% 67.0% 55.3% 66.7% 43.8% 63.0% 35.5%
33 2019 1/1 0.0 8.0 46.4% 66.7% 44.1% 60.0% 33.3% 54.5% 29.6% —/—
Career 163/163 2.0 3.4 58.8% 65.4% 49.3% 54.9% 41.0% 58.7% 38.2% 151/151 8.8 3.0 66.0% 72.3% 51.4% 58.5% 33.1% 65.1% 31.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tobias Kamke Daniel Brands
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2007 1492 106.0 -2.82 -3.49 1.057 51.7% 50.0% +0.50 1–2 (33%) +0.05
20 2008 1540 111.5 -1.86 -1.37 0.830 46.7% +37 25.0% -1.50 0–1 +0.09
21 2007 1502 102.7 +1.52 -1.81 0.323 34.5% 0.0% -4.50 -0.07 2009 1645 119.5 +2.51 -1.77 1.108 51.4% +44 53.3% +0.30 3–3 (50%) 4–3 (57%) +0.22
22 2008 1509 105.8 +1.11 -1.95 0.695 44.2% 25.0% -1.75 -0.07 2010 1671 129.6 +0.41 -4.53 0.817 46.9% -109 -45 +44 34.3% -1.14 3–4 (43%) 9–9 (50%) -1.34
23 2009 1457 96.1 2011 1691 120.3 -1.58 -5.51 0.732 45.6% -31 -86 27.8% -1.61 2–2 (50%) 5–5 (50%) -0.41
24 2010 1639 126.8 -1.68 +1.56 0.949 48.8% -130 -61 +94 46.3% -0.29 1–1 0–1 -0.29 2012 1689 117.4 +1.52 -2.94 0.940 48.7% +10 -50 45.5% -0.36 1–3 (25%) 6–6 (50%) +0.51
25 2011 1738 134.7 -2.56 +1.09 0.951 49.1% -78 -127 +18 42.4% -0.27 1–8 (11%) 3–9 (25%) +0.04 2013 1809 149.3 +2.79 -2.73 0.988 49.7% -11 +4 -192 47.8% -0.11 7–5 (58%) 9–9 (50%) -2.24
26 2012 1629 130.3 -5.44 +2.38 0.893 47.6% -3 -69 33.9% -1.11 1–6 (14%) 1–4 (20%) -0.37 2014 1713 128.9 -0.97 -3.58 0.796 46.4% +3 33.3% -1.28 0–6 (0%) 3–3 (50%) -0.62
27 2013 1731 143.6 -2.58 +2.05 0.978 50.0% +2 -95 -37 48.9% +0.08 4–6 (40%) 6–3 (67%) -0.29 2015 1729 122.1 +0.44 +1.03 1.284 52.5% +26 57.1% +0.14 1–0 1–0 -0.11
28 2014 1669 132.2 -3.08 -1.17 0.873 48.0% -24 -5 +60 42.6% -0.69 3–7 (30%) 6–5 (55%) +0.69 2016 1661 117.0 +0.34 -3.35 0.907 48.9% +50 42.1% -0.32 0–1 2–3 (40%) +0.06
29 2015 1583 117.3 -3.20 +0.43 0.825 46.0% -7 25.0% -1.69 1–1 1–1 -0.03 2017 1665 110.8 -1.31 -3.25 0.724 45.2% 16.7% -1.42 1–0 1–2 (33%) +0.08
30 2016 1707 126.4 -2.95 +1.32 0.953 49.2% -8 47.8% -0.17 1–0 3–3 (50%) +0.76 2018 1616 97.9 +1.38 +0.15 0.912 48.0% 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–0 +0.04
31 2017 1618 113.4 +0.68 +0.45 1.108 51.9% +97 55.6% +0.33 0–1 1–2 (33%) +0.10 2019 1605 109.1 +0.20 -3.04 0.961 49.1% 50.0% 0.00 1–1 -0.28
32 2018 1543 101.5
33 2019 1567 110.3 -0.77 -0.97 0.651 42.8% 25.0% -2.25 -0.04
34 2020 1532 92.8
35 2021 1492 104.4
36 2022 1515 104.4
Career 1766 131.0 -2.90 +1.13 0.926 48.7% -32 -76 +38 42.4% -0.48 12–30 (29%) 21–28 (43%) 91.3 +0.26 1886 131.0 +0.91 -3.27 0.900 48.3% -25 -9 -63 40.4% -0.64 18–26 (41%) 43–43 (50%) 98.0 -2.62

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.