H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Tobias Kamke vs Matthew Ebden H2H: 0-2
Matthew Ebden holds a 2–0 lead over Tobias Kamke in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Matthew Ebden leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Matthew Ebden won the 2017 Newport quarterfinal 4-6 7-6(6) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 40
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 38
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2017* | Newport | ATP 250 | QF | Grass | Matthew Ebden | 4-6 7-6(6) 6-4 | Tobias Kamke | Match data |
| Aug 27, 2014* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Matthew Ebden | 6-4 6-3 7-6(2) | Tobias Kamke | Match data |
| Aug 8, 2011 | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Tobias Kamke | 6-7(5) 6-3 6-2 | Matthew Ebden | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tobias Kamke | #1,114 | #64 | 744 | 1,764 | 60 | 99 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Matthew Ebden | #970 | #39 | 1,134 | 1,849 | 75 | 129 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tobias Kamke | Matthew Ebden | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #86 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #67 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #105 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #96 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #68 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2012 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #98 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 5–21 | 19.2% | #231 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2013 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #74 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #105 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2014 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #97 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #698 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #277 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #76 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #46 | 1,791 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #233 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #244 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #237 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #740 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |