H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:16 UTC
Tobias Kamke vs Pere Riba H2H: 2-0
Tobias Kamke holds a 2–0 lead over Pere Riba in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tobias Kamke leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tobias Kamke won the 2011 Hamburg second round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 40
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 38
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2011* | Hamburg | ATP 500 | R64 | Clay | Tobias Kamke | 6-1 6-1 | Pere Riba | Match data |
| Apr 10, 2011 | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | Q2 | Clay | Pere Riba | 7-5 1-6 7-5 | Tobias Kamke | Match data |
| Jan 12, 2011* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Tobias Kamke | 6-3 6-4 | Pere Riba | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tobias Kamke | #1,114 | #64 | 744 | 1,764 | 60 | 99 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Pere Riba | #1,502 | #65 | 761 | 1,731 | 24 | 63 | 27.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tobias Kamke | Pere Riba | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #272 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #121 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #72 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #89 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #67 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #447 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #96 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #126 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2012 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #98 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #114 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2013 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #74 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #219 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2014 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #97 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #274 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #277 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #233 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |