H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Tobias Kamke vs Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo H2H: 1-0

Tobias Kamke holds a 1–0 lead over Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tobias Kamke leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tobias Kamke won the 2013 Qatar Open first round 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tobias Kamke
GER Age 40 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo
ESP Age 48 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tobias Kamke #98 6-1 6-2 Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo #91 Match data Jan 2, 2013* R32 Qatar Open ATP 250 Hard
Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo #140 4-6 6-4 6-3 Tobias Kamke #224 Match data May 26, 2008* Q2 Q Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tobias Kamke #1,114 #64 744 1,766 62 101 38.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo #1,153 #50 826 1,704 68 133 33.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tobias Kamke Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 2007 0–1 0.0% #210 1,502 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2008 0–1 0.0% #243 1,508 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 — — — — — — — 2001 1–1 50.0% #154 1,491 0 0
24 2010 7–8 46.7% #67 1,639 0 0 2002 0–3 0.0% #141 1,496 0 0
25 2011 15–23 39.5% #96 1,738 0 0 2003 5–11 31.2% #80 1,477 0 0
26 2012 6–18 25.0% #98 1,628 0 0 2004 7–19 26.9% #130 1,448 0 0
27 2013 17–21 44.7% #74 1,731 0 0 2005 5–5 50.0% #120 1,499 0 0
28 2014 9–16 36.0% #97 1,669 0 0 2006 25–20 55.6% #57 1,665 0 0
29 2015 1–5 16.7% #277 1,583 0 0 2007 9–18 33.3% #133 1,546 0 0
30 2016 5–5 50.0% #118 1,707 0 0 2008 1–6 14.3% #121 1,569 0 0
31 2017 2–2 50.0% #233 1,617 0 0 2009 4–10 28.6% #156 1,584 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2010 1–4 20.0% #77 1,571 0 0
33 2019 0–1 0.0% #242 1,566 0 0 2011 5–15 25.0% #130 1,532 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2012 3–12 20.0% #91 1,571 0 0
35 — — — — — — — 2013 2–6 25.0% #166 1,567 0 0
36 — — — — — — — 2014 0–3 0.0% #224 1,620 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tobias Kamke Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
21 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2010 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2002 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2011 7 14 21 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 2003 0 2 2 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2012 5 11 16 31.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2004 0 5 5 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2013 10 11 21 47.6% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2005 — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2014 4 10 14 28.6% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2006 3 4 7 42.9% 22 14 36 61.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2015 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 1 5 6 16.7% 8 12 20 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2016 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 — — — — 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — —
31 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2019 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1 4 5 20.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 2 2 4 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 35 61 96 36.5% 16 27 43 37.2% 11 13 24 45.8% — — — — — 7 29 36 19.4% 61 94 155 39.4% 0 8 8 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 163/163 of Tobias Kamke's and 192/196 of Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tobias Kamke Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 2007 1/1 0.0 6.0 47.2% 56.0% 35.7% 16.7% — 45.3% 17.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 1/1 3.0 11.0 58.3% 64.9% 45.3% 25.0% 33.3% 56.7% 30.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 15/15 1.8 3.3 59.0% 65.8% 48.0% 56.5% 35.6% 58.8% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2011 38/38 2.3 3.5 57.2% 65.9% 50.9% 55.5% 39.3% 59.5% 38.5% 2003 16/16 4.5 3.1 60.8% 67.7% 46.4% 48.6% 50.7% 59.1% 39.0%
26 2012 24/24 1.4 4.6 57.4% 61.6% 45.8% 47.2% 39.2% 54.8% 40.4% 2004 25/26 2.2 3.6 57.9% 66.1% 46.0% 58.2% 34.5% 57.6% 33.6%
27 2013 38/38 2.2 2.6 60.4% 66.9% 49.5% 60.7% 46.9% 60.0% 39.2% 2005 10/10 1.8 1.6 61.2% 66.2% 52.9% 44.7% 42.7% 61.5% 38.1%
28 2014 25/25 2.4 3.3 61.0% 66.2% 51.7% 60.8% 36.4% 60.4% 34.6% 2006 44/45 4.2 2.4 59.1% 70.0% 46.7% 56.8% 45.3% 60.5% 38.8%
29 2015 6/6 2.2 2.5 56.5% 61.9% 46.0% 38.6% 45.4% 54.5% 37.5% 2007 25/27 2.9 4.9 55.2% 65.2% 43.6% 52.4% 60.3% 55.5% 38.3%
30 2016 10/10 1.0 3.1 61.2% 64.4% 50.3% 45.7% 44.5% 58.8% 39.3% 2008 7/7 1.7 4.6 53.1% 66.9% 43.3% 51.5% 40.4% 55.7% 39.0%
31 2017 4/4 2.3 3.5 57.0% 73.4% 51.3% 60.9% 58.5% 64.2% 39.7% 2009 14/14 2.4 5.1 55.3% 67.0% 45.5% 62.4% 38.6% 57.2% 36.2%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 5/5 3.4 3.2 58.2% 68.7% 41.4% 48.3% 29.2% 57.3% 33.3%
33 2019 1/1 0.0 8.0 46.4% 66.7% 44.1% 60.0% 33.3% 54.5% 29.6% 2011 20/20 2.5 4.4 55.9% 63.8% 44.8% 53.5% 47.8% 55.3% 35.6%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 15/15 2.7 5.2 53.7% 66.8% 46.2% 49.3% 37.1% 57.2% 35.0%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 8/8 4.3 4.1 53.9% 71.8% 47.5% 61.8% 36.2% 60.3% 34.2%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 3/3 0.7 3.7 50.9% 60.3% 45.5% 47.8% 47.2% 53.6% 34.5%
Career — 163/163 2.0 3.4 58.8% 65.4% 49.3% 54.9% 41.0% 58.7% 38.2% — 192/201 3.1 3.7 57.1% 67.1% 45.9% 54.2% 44.4% 58.0% 36.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tobias Kamke Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
21 2007 1502 102.7 +1.52 -1.81 0.323 34.5% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 1509 105.8 +1.11 -1.95 0.695 44.2% — — — 25.0% -1.75 — — — -0.07 2000 1482 94.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 1457 96.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1492 104.2 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.09
24 2010 1639 126.8 -1.68 +1.56 0.949 48.8% -130 -61 +94 46.3% -0.29 1–1 0–1 — -0.29 2002 1497 110.2 — — — — — +38 — 25.0% -2.12 0–2 — — -0.52
25 2011 1738 134.7 -2.56 +1.09 0.951 49.1% -78 -127 +18 42.4% -0.27 1–8 (11%) 3–9 (25%) 89.6 +0.04 2003 1478 114.0 -1.75 -0.48 0.954 48.8% -2 +54 — 40.5% -0.76 2–6 (25%) 2–4 (33%) 95.3 +0.83
26 2012 1629 130.3 -5.44 +2.38 0.893 47.6% -3 -69 — 33.9% -1.11 1–6 (14%) 1–4 (20%) 91.7 -0.37 2004 1448 112.1 -4.06 -3.50 0.792 46.1% -24 +58 — 33.8% -1.28 2–5 (29%) 4–4 (50%) 98.9 +0.77
27 2013 1731 143.6 -2.58 +2.05 0.978 50.0% +2 -95 -37 48.9% +0.08 4–6 (40%) 6–3 (67%) 102.2 -0.29 2005 1500 117.9 -0.46 -0.04 0.991 49.6% — +55 — 50.0% +0.05 — 1–0 — -0.16
28 2014 1669 132.2 -3.08 -1.17 0.873 48.0% -24 -5 +60 42.6% -0.69 3–7 (30%) 6–5 (55%) 99.9 +0.69 2006 1665 136.3 -0.89 +0.15 0.983 50.1% -205 +93 — 51.8% -0.01 10–6 (63%) 10–8 (56%) 107.9 -0.23
29 2015 1583 117.3 -3.20 +0.43 0.825 46.0% -7 — — 25.0% -1.69 1–1 1–1 — -0.03 2007 1546 122.6 -4.46 +0.12 0.860 47.2% -108 +96 — 38.8% -0.85 1–5 (17%) 4–3 (57%) 95.4 -0.16
30 2016 1707 126.4 -2.95 +1.32 0.953 49.2% -8 — — 47.8% -0.17 1–0 3–3 (50%) — +0.76 2008 1570 121.0 -2.71 +1.08 0.881 47.6% — +67 — 33.3% -0.87 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — -0.05
31 2017 1618 113.4 +0.68 +0.45 1.108 51.9% — — +97 55.6% +0.33 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.10 2009 1585 117.3 -3.43 -1.01 0.847 47.1% -183 +83 — 33.3% -1.15 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) 96.5 -0.21
32 2018 1543 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1571 118.8 -1.59 -2.39 0.781 46.7% — +106 — 18.2% -1.27 — 0–2 — -0.10
33 2019 1567 110.3 -0.77 -0.97 0.651 42.8% — — — 25.0% -2.25 — — — -0.04 2011 1532 118.2 -5.08 -1.56 0.798 46.2% -132 +68 — 31.4% -1.35 2–4 (33%) 6–5 (55%) 101.7 +0.81
34 2020 1532 92.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1571 127.4 -3.34 -2.07 0.818 46.7% -103 +25 -145 27.5% -1.02 1–4 (20%) 0–4 (0%) 92.9 +0.46
35 2021 1492 104.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1568 119.9 -1.67 -1.61 0.864 47.7% — +36 — 38.9% -0.67 0–2 1–1 — +0.50
36 2022 1515 104.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1620 118.9 -2.17 -1.23 0.744 44.3% — +60 — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — 0.00
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1603 97.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1605 95.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1528 101.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1766 131.0 -2.90 +1.13 0.926 48.7% -32 -76 +38 42.4% -0.48 12–30 (29%) 21–28 (43%) 91.3 +0.26 — 1705 127.1 -2.77 -0.95 0.877 47.8% -121 +72 -145 38.5% -0.80 19–41 (32%) 29–35 (45%) 92.4 +1.01

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.