H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Todd Martin vs Ronald Agenor H2H: 1-1

Todd Martin and Ronald Agenor are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ronald Agenor leads 1–0 on clay, while Todd Martin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Todd Martin won the 1993 US Open round of 64 6-3 4-1 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Todd Martin
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Ronald Agenor
HAI Age 61 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Todd Martin #17 6-3 4-1 (ret.) Ronald Agenor #87 Match data Sep 3, 1993* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Ronald Agenor #102 7-6(4) 7-5 Todd Martin #39 Match data Apr 29, 1993* R32 Atlanta ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Todd Martin #145 #4 2,969 2,064 398 223 64.1% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Ronald Agenor #1,507 #22 984 1,896 215 253 45.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Todd Martin Ronald Agenor
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1990 3–4 42.9% #269 1,515 0 0 1984 0–2 0.0% #418 1,480 0 0
20 1991 10–8 55.6% #134 1,652 0 0 1985 17–14 54.8% #49 1,657 0 0
21 1992 22–19 53.7% #87 1,724 0 0 1986 20–22 47.6% #74 1,672 0 0
22 1993 45–23 66.2% #13 1,886 0 1 1987 25–20 55.6% #44 1,736 0 0
23 1994 50–19 72.5% #10 1,945 0 3 1988 24–18 57.1% #28 1,758 0 0
24 1995 45–21 68.2% #18 1,913 0 4 1989 24–17 58.5% #37 1,767 0 1
25 1996 49–20 71.0% #12 1,923 0 5 1990 33–25 56.9% #29 1,816 0 3
26 1997 13–7 65.0% #81 1,913 0 5 1991 16–27 37.2% #74 1,643 0 3
27 1998 43–20 68.3% #16 1,998 0 7 1992 5–16 23.8% #132 1,538 0 3
28 1999 42–17 71.2% #7 1,914 0 8 1993 17–25 40.5% #58 1,603 0 3
29 2000 14–12 53.8% #55 1,862 0 8 1994 15–23 39.5% #71 1,580 0 3
30 2001 13–11 54.2% #57 1,816 0 8 1995 8–12 40.0% #146 1,586 0 3
31 2002 24–16 60.0% #47 1,785 0 8 1996 0–5 0.0% #326 1,525 0 3
32 2003 15–11 57.7% #68 1,842 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2004 10–15 40.0% #145 1,688 0 8 1998 1–1 50.0% #237 1,530 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 1999 3–7 30.0% #96 1,521 0 3
35 — — — — — — — 2000 6–16 27.3% #137 1,430 0 3
36 — — — — — — — 2001 1–3 25.0% #188 1,466 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Todd Martin Ronald Agenor
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1990 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1984 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1991 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1985 3 4 7 42.9% 14 10 24 58.3% — — — — — — — —
21 1992 12 10 22 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1986 1 4 5 20.0% 17 14 31 54.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
22 1993 21 12 33 63.6% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 2 10 80.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1987 6 6 12 50.0% 18 12 30 60.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1994 22 8 30 73.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 10 1 11 90.9% 8 6 14 57.1% 1988 4 5 9 44.4% 17 10 27 63.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
24 1995 25 10 35 71.4% 7 4 11 63.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 1989 5 5 10 50.0% 15 7 22 68.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
25 1996 29 10 39 74.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 7 4 11 63.6% 1990 5 8 13 38.5% 18 13 31 58.1% — — — — 10 4 14 71.4%
26 1997 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 9 12 21 42.9% — — — — 6 10 16 37.5%
27 1998 26 12 38 68.4% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1992 2 4 6 33.3% 3 10 13 23.1% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
28 1999 30 11 41 73.2% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1993 3 10 13 23.1% 12 11 23 52.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
29 2000 11 7 18 61.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1994 3 7 10 30.0% 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
30 2001 8 6 14 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 1995 5 4 9 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
31 2002 17 11 28 60.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
32 2003 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2004 5 9 14 35.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1998 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 2 6 8 25.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 227 122 349 65.0% 64 42 106 60.4% 59 25 84 70.2% 48 34 82 58.5% — 42 76 118 35.6% 138 130 268 51.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 32 41 73 43.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 49/51 of Todd Martin's and 182/207 of Ronald Agenor's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Todd Martin Ronald Agenor
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 41/43 3.0 2.0 67.4% 63.9% 44.3% 45.2% 43.7% 57.1% 36.1%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 18/21 3.0 1.6 66.1% 60.7% 46.2% 52.1% 50.8% 55.7% 37.8%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 33/42 3.6 1.5 61.4% 65.9% 48.0% 55.0% 42.1% 59.0% 39.2%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 36/38 3.1 1.9 58.4% 66.4% 50.7% 56.8% 41.4% 59.8% 36.5%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 19/20 4.6 1.9 62.4% 65.9% 51.2% 58.9% 41.8% 60.2% 36.9%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 3/5 6.3 2.7 68.4% 63.8% 37.7% 44.5% 56.7% 55.4% 38.1%
32 2003 24/26 10.0 5.2 58.9% 77.1% 51.2% 63.9% 49.9% 66.4% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2004 25/25 10.5 4.1 62.5% 75.3% 49.7% 57.7% 31.7% 65.7% 35.3% 1998 2/2 2.0 3.5 73.0% 64.0% 34.2% 42.3% 48.8% 55.9% 44.1%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 8/10 1.4 2.1 71.1% 62.3% 43.3% 55.5% 35.1% 57.4% 34.7%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 18/22 2.6 3.1 65.3% 62.1% 50.7% 49.4% 40.9% 58.3% 37.1%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 4/4 1.5 2.8 66.1% 64.1% 48.7% 55.8% 54.6% 59.0% 37.2%
Career — 49/621 10.3 4.6 60.8% 76.2% 50.4% 60.7% 40.6% 66.1% 36.0% — 182/468 3.2 2.0 63.9% 64.4% 47.6% 52.5% 43.3% 58.3% 37.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Todd Martin Ronald Agenor
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1990 1516 114.1 — — — — +28 — — 40.0% 0.00 2–0 0–4 (0%) — +0.50 1984 1481 105.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 0–1 — +0.07
20 1991 1652 125.4 — — — — -62 -40 -7 55.8% +0.56 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) 100.0 +1.12 1985 1658 140.8 — — — — -107 +24 — 51.4% +0.27 6–4 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 104.8 +0.06
21 1992 1724 141.4 — — — — -19 -110 -46 55.8% +0.54 4–9 (31%) 8–8 (50%) 97.1 +0.21 1986 1673 146.8 — — — — -122 +62 — 48.5% +0.17 4–9 (31%) 3–6 (33%) 94.6 -1.67
22 1993 1887 155.8 — — — — -16 -193 -64 62.4% +0.78 10–9 (53%) 16–17 (48%) 100.9 -0.69 1987 1737 146.2 — — — — -103 +50 — 52.5% +0.28 11–9 (55%) 6–12 (33%) 97.1 -0.17
23 1994 1945 157.2 — — — — -18 -177 +80 64.0% +0.94 19–8 (70%) 26–17 (60%) 107.1 -1.38 1988 1758 147.5 — — — — -108 +114 — 54.5% +0.37 10–5 (67%) 3–6 (33%) 102.0 -2.17
24 1995 1913 152.5 — — — — +27 -141 +46 62.5% +0.71 11–4 (73%) 20–12 (63%) 108.7 -0.11 1989 1767 140.6 — — — — -86 +69 — 56.6% +0.51 7–6 (54%) 5–12 (29%) 95.1 -0.70
25 1996 1923 161.1 — — — — +26 -122 +82 66.3% +1.07 11–10 (52%) 15–12 (56%) 98.3 -1.56 1990 1817 146.9 — — — — -53 +22 — 52.4% +0.25 14–7 (67%) 11–11 (50%) 104.9 -2.13
26 1997 1914 152.5 — — — — +27 — — 63.3% +0.53 2–4 (33%) 6–3 (67%) 97.1 -1.34 1991 1644 129.0 -2.96 -1.86 0.840 46.7% +4 +89 — 41.5% -0.55 9–9 (50%) 6–10 (38%) 96.0 -0.22
27 1998 1999 161.9 — — — — +10 -105 -16 64.0% +0.82 12–7 (63%) 19–11 (63%) 106.8 -4.34 1992 1538 118.8 -3.87 -0.90 0.853 46.8% +65 +61 — 35.2% -0.52 2–8 (20%) 0–8 (0%) 87.5 -0.10
28 1999 1914 156.7 — — — — +32 +22 +54 63.2% +0.70 14–10 (58%) 26–16 (62%) 99.2 -0.18 1993 1603 135.0 -0.84 +0.11 0.956 49.1% -46 +90 — 44.2% -0.28 6–10 (38%) 11–12 (48%) 98.4 -0.63
29 2000 1862 141.9 — — — — +57 +9 +96 54.5% +0.48 3–4 (43%) 7–10 (41%) 93.4 -0.87 1994 1580 139.1 -0.81 -0.72 0.907 48.4% -20 +103 — 42.2% -0.44 8–9 (47%) 6–9 (40%) 100.2 -1.66
30 2001 1816 132.4 — — — — +63 -59 +147 51.3% -0.17 6–3 (67%) 6–5 (55%) 100.3 -0.33 1995 1586 133.1 -0.47 -0.84 0.927 48.7% +44 +35 — 43.8% -0.29 2–4 (33%) 1–5 (17%) 94.5 +0.29
31 2002 1786 147.1 — — — — +51 -34 +125 58.3% +0.40 6–6 (50%) 14–10 (58%) 98.5 -2.19 1996 1525 105.4 +0.11 -1.40 0.854 46.6% +53 — — 9.1% -1.91 0–1 0–6 (0%) — +0.16
32 2003 1842 133.5 +2.69 +0.10 1.096 51.8% +8 -108 +98 61.8% +0.46 1–5 (17%) 9–6 (60%) 94.9 -0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2004 1688 130.3 +1.82 +0.03 1.029 50.4% +23 +23 +195 43.8% -0.21 5–6 (45%) 10–9 (53%) 98.0 -1.17 1998 1531 103.2 -1.61 -0.77 0.999 49.8% — — — 50.0% 0.00 1–1 0–1 — +0.12
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1521 118.4 -1.43 -2.23 0.813 46.6% +36 +84 — 31.8% -0.82 1–1 2–3 (40%) — -0.06
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1430 102.3 -2.84 -1.35 0.891 47.4% +45 +90 +95 33.9% -1.20 1–6 (14%) 5–4 (56%) 93.9 +1.60
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1467 112.1 -2.05 +0.32 0.908 48.9% +50 — — 40.0% -0.50 0–2 0–1 — +0.18
Career — 2064 158.1 +2.25 +0.06 1.062 51.1% +15 -99 +51 60.5% +0.64 108–88 (55%) 185–143 (56%) 101.2 -2.06 — 1896 144.1 -1.82 -0.97 0.891 47.8% -37 +67 +95 47.0% -0.08 82–92 (47%) 65–114 (36%) 89.5 -1.50

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.