H2H data updated: 2026-07-26 01:16 UTC
Tomas Barrios Vera vs Jeremy Chardy H2H: 0-1
Jeremy Chardy holds a 1–0 lead over Tomas Barrios Vera in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jeremy Chardy leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jeremy Chardy won the 2021 Tokyo Olympics second round 6-1 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Chile
Age 28
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2021* | Tokyo Olympics | Olympics | R64 | Hard | Jeremy Chardy | 6-1 7-6(4) | Tomas Barrios Vera | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Barrios Vera | #139 | #93 | 630 | 1,650 | 8 | 23 | 25.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jeremy Chardy | #1,077 | #25 | 1,486 | 1,967 | 293 | 304 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Barrios Vera | Jeremy Chardy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #261 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #75 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #254 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #32 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2021 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #147 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #45 | 1,829 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #230 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #103 | 1,729 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2023 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #103 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #32 | 1,823 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2024 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #154 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #34 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2025 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #111 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #29 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2026 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #139 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,897 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #69 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #78 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #40 | 1,829 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #51 | 1,917 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #75 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #107 | 1,794 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #519 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 |