H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Tomas Barrios Vera vs Jozef Kovalik H2H: 0-1
Jozef Kovalik holds a 1–0 lead over Tomas Barrios Vera in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jozef Kovalik leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jozef Kovalik won the 2021 Cordoba fourth round 4-6 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Chile
Age 28
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Slovakia
Age 33
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2023* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Q1 | Clay | Tomas Barrios Vera | 6-3 7-5 | Jozef Kovalik | Match data |
| Feb 20, 2023 | Rio de Janeiro | ATP 500 | Q1 | Clay | Tomas Barrios Vera | 6-4 6-4 | Jozef Kovalik | Match data |
| May 22, 2022* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Q1 | Clay | Tomas Barrios Vera | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | Jozef Kovalik | Match data |
| Feb 26, 2021* | Cordoba | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Jozef Kovalik | 4-6 6-2 6-3 | Tomas Barrios Vera | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Barrios Vera | #139 | #93 | 630 | 1,652 | 8 | 21 | 27.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jozef Kovalik | #591 | #80 | 701 | 1,758 | 26 | 46 | 36.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Barrios Vera | Jozef Kovalik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #254 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #147 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #117 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #230 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #165 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2023 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #103 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #85 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2024 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #154 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #139 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2025 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #111 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #131 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2026 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #139 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #149 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #137 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #228 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #127 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |