H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Tomas Zib vs Marzio Martelli

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Tomas Zib vs Marzio Martelli.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tomas Zib
CZE Age 50 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main draw meetings
Marzio Martelli
ITA Age 54 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tomas Zib #120 7-5 6-4 Marzio Martelli #258 Match data Jan 15, 2001 Q1 Q Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tomas Zib #1,339 #51 688 1,637 41 94 30.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Marzio Martelli #1,358 #96 473 1,623 19 31 38.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Zib Marzio Martelli
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
22 1998 0–1 0.0% #172 1,487 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1999 4–4 50.0% #111 1,531 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2000 5–13 27.8% #117 1,465 0 0 1996 3–2 60.0% #159 1,539 0 0
25 2001 3–11 21.4% #224 1,438 0 0 1997 10–13 43.5% #134 1,606 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 1998 4–11 26.7% #126 1,560 0 0
27 2003 1–5 16.7% #145 1,467 0 0 1999 0–2 0.0% #226 1,526 0 0
28 2004 3–8 27.3% #121 1,482 0 0 2000 1–1 50.0% #280 1,530 0 0
29 2005 18–27 40.0% #59 1,558 0 0 2001 1–2 33.3% #355 1,514 0 0
30 2006 4–20 16.7% #133 1,509 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2007 3–4 42.9% #138 1,535 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2008 0–1 0.0% #416 1,545 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tomas Zib Marzio Martelli
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
22 1998 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1999 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2000 2 4 6 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1996 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2001 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1997 4 4 8 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 4 10 14 28.6% — — — — — — — —
27 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1999 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2004 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2005 8 13 21 38.1% 7 10 17 41.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2006 1 9 10 10.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 20 42 62 32.3% 14 36 50 28.0% 6 10 16 37.5% 1 6 7 14.3% — 5 6 11 45.5% 12 22 34 35.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 123/134 of Tomas Zib's and 44/50 of Marzio Martelli's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tomas Zib Marzio Martelli
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
23 1999 6/8 5.3 2.3 64.3% 66.8% 49.9% 66.8% 48.2% 61.0% 40.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2000 12/18 2.4 1.9 61.0% 63.4% 47.2% 58.4% 41.1% 57.0% 37.4% 1996 5/5 3.8 3.6 51.8% 76.6% 40.4% 55.6% 38.6% 59.8% 43.2%
25 2001 12/14 3.0 1.4 63.1% 65.7% 43.7% 41.2% 47.7% 57.7% 33.8% 1997 21/23 7.3 5.7 44.4% 76.8% 45.4% 47.6% 31.6% 59.3% 35.1%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 12/15 8.7 4.4 49.0% 74.0% 44.0% 62.4% 36.8% 58.4% 33.7%
27 2003 6/6 2.3 2.0 57.8% 64.6% 50.3% 49.9% 22.2% 58.6% 27.5% 1999 2/2 1.5 4.0 55.3% 63.5% 32.8% 50.0% 27.1% 50.3% 36.4%
28 2004 11/11 3.8 2.1 56.9% 73.1% 55.6% 36.2% 24.5% 65.3% 34.6% 2000 2/2 5.5 0.5 52.3% 66.6% 45.8% 76.3% 22.7% 56.1% 38.3%
29 2005 44/45 3.7 1.9 57.7% 68.3% 50.5% 54.5% 43.5% 60.8% 34.9% 2001 2/3 5.0 0.5 64.4% 70.8% 50.5% 28.6% 29.5% 62.9% 42.8%
30 2006 24/24 4.3 2.1 56.5% 65.2% 48.6% 51.0% 32.7% 57.8% 31.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 7/7 3.4 1.7 59.2% 72.8% 47.8% 58.1% 55.7% 62.3% 31.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 1/1 12.0 5.0 62.6% 63.6% 51.9% 76.9% 31.6% 59.2% 37.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 123/135 3.7 1.9 58.7% 67.4% 49.4% 52.0% 39.7% 59.9% 34.0% — 44/50 6.8 4.6 48.3% 74.7% 44.1% 53.1% 33.1% 58.7% 36.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tomas Zib Marzio Martelli
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
22 1998 1488 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1999 1532 114.4 -0.88 +1.34 1.036 50.8% +42 -22 — 50.0% -0.25 1–3 (25%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2000 1466 109.0 -2.45 -1.12 0.869 47.6% +77 +6 — 30.2% -1.12 1–2 (33%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.93 1996 1540 118.8 +0.54 -0.23 1.075 51.8% — +41 — 63.6% +0.64 0–1 1–0 — +0.18
25 2001 1438 104.1 -3.27 -2.71 0.797 46.2% +74 -29 +70 26.7% -1.27 0–2 0–4 (0%) — +0.84 1997 1606 124.4 -2.29 -1.75 0.862 47.1% -21 +7 +11 43.9% -0.53 4–3 (57%) 5–4 (56%) — -0.31
26 2002 1446 99.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1560 125.1 -1.40 -1.70 0.811 46.9% — +27 — 32.4% -0.97 1–2 (33%) 4–6 (40%) — -0.08
27 2003 1467 112.3 -1.03 -2.85 0.665 43.6% +18 — — 21.4% -2.14 — 2–1 (67%) — -0.14 1999 1526 97.0 -0.55 -2.77 0.732 43.0% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.27
28 2004 1483 116.6 +0.88 -0.84 0.995 48.9% +57 -63 — 37.9% -0.52 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.23 2000 1531 101.1 -0.95 -0.49 0.873 47.4% — — — 40.0% 0.00 1–0 — — +0.10
29 2005 1559 125.5 -1.66 -2.16 0.889 48.0% -7 -52 -39 39.4% -0.58 5–4 (56%) 6–10 (38%) — +0.40 2001 1515 106.0 +0.58 -1.22 1.155 51.3% — — — 33.3% -1.00 — 1–0 — -0.12
30 2006 1510 117.1 -2.65 -3.89 0.738 44.8% -21 -33 +10 23.2% -1.89 0–4 (0%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 1536 109.9 -0.29 -0.67 0.843 47.8% -52 — — 38.9% -0.50 1–0 2–1 (67%) — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 1546 108.9 -2.23 -0.51 0.914 49.3% — — — 40.0% 0.00 0–1 1–1 — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 1544 102.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1637 118.7 -1.72 -2.10 0.848 47.2% +15 -33 +1 33.9% -0.98 9–20 (31%) 21–28 (43%) 92.8 +0.73 — 1623 124.9 -1.46 -1.53 0.877 47.6% -21 +23 +11 40.0% -0.64 6–6 (50%) 11–10 (52%) 104.2 +0.08

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.