H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Victor Crivoi vs Marius Copil H2H: 0-2
Marius Copil holds a 2–0 lead over Victor Crivoi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marius Copil leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Marius Copil won the 2011 Bucharest third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 44
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 35
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2014 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Q1 | Clay | Marius Copil | 6-4 7-6(4) | Victor Crivoi | Match data |
| Sep 22, 2011* | Bucharest | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Marius Copil | 6-3 6-3 | Victor Crivoi | Match data |
| Sep 24, 2009* | Bucharest | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Marius Copil | 6-3 6-2 | Victor Crivoi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victor Crivoi | #1,921 | #75 | 820 | 1,682 | 12 | 29 | 29.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marius Copil | #1,021 | #56 | 888 | 1,811 | 47 | 81 | 36.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Victor Crivoi | Marius Copil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #467 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #291 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #217 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #160 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #147 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #269 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #198 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #165 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #132 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #133 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #60 | 1,809 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2010 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #176 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #153 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2011 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #240 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #374 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |