H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Victor Hanescu vs Albert Portas H2H: 1-0
Victor Hanescu holds a 1–0 lead over Albert Portas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Victor Hanescu leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Victor Hanescu won the 2003 Wimbledon first round 7-6(4) 6-0 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 44
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2003* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Victor Hanescu | 7-6(4) 6-0 6-0 | Albert Portas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victor Hanescu | #1,025 | #26 | 1,671 | 1,843 | 186 | 226 | 45.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Albert Portas | #1,082 | #19 | 1,350 | 1,826 | 142 | 198 | 41.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Victor Hanescu | Albert Portas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #392 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2003 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #70 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #119 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #92 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #35 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #35 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #646 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #84 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #50 | 1,756 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 26–30 | 46.4% | #48 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #20 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2010 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 9–23 | 28.1% | #88 | 1,525 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2011 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #85 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2012 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #62 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,443 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2013 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #119 | 1,437 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2014 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #122 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #140 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #279 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #338 | 1,548 | 0 | 1 |