H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Victor Hanescu vs Alejandro Falla H2H: 1-1

Victor Hanescu and Alejandro Falla are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Victor Hanescu leads 1–0 on grass, while Alejandro Falla leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alejandro Falla won the 2010 Miami Masters first round 7-6(4) 3-6 6-4.

ROU Age 44 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1 1
2 main draw meetings
COL Age 42 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 29, 2012 Paris Masters Masters 1000 Q2 Q Hard Alejandro Falla #56 4-6 7-6(5) 6-4 Victor Hanescu #61 Match data
Mar 26, 2010* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R128 Hard Alejandro Falla #70 7-6(4) 3-6 6-4 Victor Hanescu #42 Match data
Jun 25, 2008* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Victor Hanescu #81 6-3 6-7(2) 6-0 6-4 Alejandro Falla #106 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Victor Hanescu #1,025 #26 1,671 1,843 186 226 45.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Alejandro Falla #646 #50 869 1,813 97 158 38.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Victor Hanescu Alejandro Falla
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2002 3–3 50.0% #172 1,520 0 0 2004 5–7 41.7% #127 1,596 0 0
21 2003 13–12 52.0% #70 1,667 0 0 2005 0–2 0.0% #231 1,532 0 0
22 2004 17–23 42.5% #92 1,572 0 0 2006 4–8 33.3% #108 1,618 0 0
23 2005 25–22 53.2% #35 1,727 0 0 2007 12–16 42.9% #81 1,738 0 0
24 2006 0–6 0.0% #646 1,652 0 0 2008 6–11 35.3% #180 1,603 0 0
25 2007 7–7 50.0% #76 1,683 0 0 2009 2–8 20.0% #81 1,744 0 0
26 2008 20–21 48.8% #50 1,756 0 1 2010 14–19 42.4% #105 1,684 0 0
27 2009 26–30 46.4% #48 1,705 0 1 2011 9–14 39.1% #74 1,714 0 0
28 2010 23–24 48.9% #51 1,706 0 1 2012 14–23 37.8% #54 1,756 0 0
29 2011 16–24 40.0% #90 1,687 0 1 2013 13–20 39.4% #99 1,707 0 0
30 2012 6–13 31.6% #62 1,618 0 1 2014 9–17 34.6% #88 1,625 0 0
31 2013 18–25 41.9% #80 1,689 0 1 2015 7–11 38.9% #122 1,713 0 0
32 2014 11–15 42.3% #122 1,735 0 1 2016 1–1 50.0% #273 1,557 0 0
33 2015 1–1 50.0% #279 1,655 0 1 2017 1–1 50.0% #397 1,578 0 0