H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Victor Hanescu vs Chris Guccione H2H: 0-1

Chris Guccione holds a 1–0 lead over Victor Hanescu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Chris Guccione leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chris Guccione won the 2008 Las Vegas round of 32 6-2 4-6 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Victor Hanescu
ROU Age 45 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Chris Guccione
AUS Age 41 Left-Handed 201 cm / 6'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Chris Guccione #70 6-2 4-6 7-6(5) Victor Hanescu #68 Match data Mar 6, 2008* R32 Las Vegas International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Victor Hanescu #1,025 #26 1,671 1,843 187 228 45.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Chris Guccione #986 #67 926 1,681 36 59 37.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Victor Hanescu Chris Guccione
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2003 2–2 50.0% #462 1,482 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2004 2–2 50.0% #281 1,540 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2005 3–3 50.0% #155 1,586 0 0
20 2002 3–3 50.0% #172 1,520 0 0 2006 1–3 25.0% #153 1,543 0 0
21 2003 13–12 52.0% #70 1,667 0 0 2007 8–15 34.8% #91 1,524 0 0
22 2004 17–24 41.5% #92 1,560 0 0 2008 11–18 37.9% #96 1,560 0 0
23 2005 25–22 53.2% #35 1,726 0 0 2009 7–8 46.7% #136 1,619 0 0
24 2006 0–6 0.0% #646 1,651 0 0 2010 0–2 0.0% #376 1,554 0 0
25 2007 7–7 50.0% #76 1,683 0 0 2011 1–3 25.0% #256 1,584 0 0
26 2008 21–22 48.8% #50 1,759 0 1 2012 0–1 0.0% #570 1,644 0 0
27 2009 26–30 46.4% #48 1,706 0 1 2013 1–1 50.0% #520 1,640 0 0
28 2010 23–24 48.9% #51 1,706 0 1 2014 0–1 0.0% #980 1,664 0 0
29 2011 16–24 40.0% #90 1,687 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2012 6–13 31.6% #62 1,618 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2013 18–25 41.9% #80 1,688 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2014 11–15 42.3% #122 1,734 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2015 1–1 50.0% #279 1,655 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Victor Hanescu Chris Guccione
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
20 2002 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 2 3 5 40.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2007 6 9 15 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
22 2004 4 8 12 33.3% 10 11 21 47.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2008 10 13 23 43.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
23 2005 7 7 14 50.0% 16 9 25 64.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2009 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2006 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — — 2011 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2008 10 14 24 41.7% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 9 17 26 34.6% 15 11 26 57.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2013 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2010 8 10 18 44.4% 13 13 26 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2014 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2011 2 7 9 22.2% 13 15 28 46.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 1 4 5 20.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 4 14 18 22.2% 14 9 23 60.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 4 7 11 36.4% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 52 97 149 34.9% 121 106 227 53.3% 13 19 32 40.6% 1 6 7 14.3% — 29 41 70 41.4% 1 6 7 14.3% 6 12 18 33.3% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 408/415 of Victor Hanescu's and 94/95 of Chris Guccione's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Victor Hanescu Chris Guccione
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 4/4 18.0 5.5 59.7% 83.3% 51.5% 76.8% 50.0% 70.5% 33.2%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 4/4 12.0 3.0 55.7% 84.5% 53.8% 74.2% 26.2% 71.2% 28.2%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 6/6 12.8 4.5 58.1% 76.4% 54.5% 33.9% 17.5% 67.3% 32.2%
20 2002 5/6 2.8 1.6 60.7% 63.8% 54.1% 61.2% 48.1% 59.8% 38.9% 2006 4/4 19.8 4.8 59.3% 76.5% 44.7% 58.0% 41.7% 63.5% 26.2%
21 2003 25/25 4.1 2.3 65.8% 70.6% 50.5% 63.4% 48.4% 64.0% 36.3% 2007 23/23 15.7 3.6 58.3% 78.3% 53.8% 65.4% 26.3% 68.0% 28.5%
22 2004 40/41 6.5 2.3 67.5% 69.3% 50.8% 63.0% 45.0% 63.2% 35.3% 2008 28/29 14.9 2.6 62.0% 79.7% 52.6% 72.1% 36.1% 69.4% 26.6%
23 2005 47/47 5.5 1.4 68.9% 69.0% 51.8% 70.5% 41.2% 63.4% 36.2% 2009 15/15 13.7 3.4 59.7% 79.1% 49.9% 67.5% 36.4% 67.8% 29.2%
24 2006 6/6 5.2 2.8 64.0% 60.4% 48.5% 47.6% 37.8% 56.3% 33.4% 2010 2/2 12.5 1.0 63.6% 74.2% 59.8% 65.0% 0.0% 69.6% 19.6%
25 2007 12/14 4.3 0.8 72.3% 74.1% 51.9% 69.3% 27.0% 67.9% 34.5% 2011 4/4 13.0 3.5 60.3% 80.8% 46.3% 82.6% 56.3% 67.3% 30.0%
26 2008 40/43 5.6 1.6 69.2% 71.7% 52.4% 60.3% 44.5% 65.6% 33.9% 2012 1/1 7.0 6.0 53.9% 68.8% 43.9% 20.0% 40.0% 57.3% 33.3%
27 2009 56/56 4.6 1.7 69.2% 69.7% 51.5% 62.3% 41.8% 64.0% 36.6% 2013 2/2 8.5 2.0 72.0% 90.6% 51.5% 50.0% 54.2% 79.0% 45.8%
28 2010 47/47 6.2 1.6 71.8% 71.0% 50.9% 60.8% 34.6% 65.3% 35.4% 2014 1/1 13.0 1.0 64.7% 81.8% 41.7% 66.7% 0.0% 67.6% 18.0%
29 2011 40/40 3.9 1.8 67.2% 69.6% 50.1% 47.9% 43.3% 63.3% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 19/19 3.3 1.0 72.5% 65.7% 48.9% 58.7% 41.8% 61.5% 34.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 43/43 3.6 1.1 70.4% 68.7% 50.1% 56.0% 37.4% 63.3% 34.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 26/26 3.6 1.7 70.6% 67.4% 44.8% 59.5% 35.3% 60.8% 34.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 2/2 8.0 1.0 62.6% 80.9% 60.3% 80.0% 25.0% 73.0% 34.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 408/415 4.8 1.6 69.1% 69.5% 50.6% 60.6% 40.7% 63.7% 35.5% — 94/95 14.6 3.3 60.1% 79.3% 51.9% 66.2% 33.1% 68.5% 28.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Victor Hanescu Chris Guccione
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1485 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1483 106.2 +0.35 -0.92 1.125 52.1% — — — 60.0% +0.50 0–2 4–1 (80%) — +0.38
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1540 116.2 +1.58 -2.45 0.978 50.0% +18 — — 50.0% +0.10 — 2–1 (67%) — -0.04
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1586 111.9 +2.37 -2.26 0.985 48.7% — — +20 42.1% -0.63 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 103.5 -0.21
20 2002 1520 111.3 -1.52 +0.27 0.969 49.8% — +31 — 45.5% +0.18 0–1 1–0 — +0.18 2006 1543 108.6 +0.30 -2.26 0.719 46.7% -25 — — 20.0% -0.90 1–0 0–3 (0%) — -0.30
21 2003 1667 132.9 +1.94 -0.77 1.011 50.6% -105 +5 -57 53.1% +0.31 2–3 (40%) 4–6 (40%) 98.4 -0.42 2007 1525 119.6 +2.74 -5.40 0.891 48.7% +37 -14 +27 40.3% -0.56 3–6 (33%) 11–11 (50%) 98.9 +0.16
22 2004 1560 128.8 -0.24 -1.30 0.958 49.7% -32 +93 +47 46.5% -0.03 6–8 (43%) 8–15 (35%) 97.3 +0.44 2008 1560 127.5 +4.75 -7.05 0.870 48.4% +42 — -45 39.2% -0.72 4–4 (50%) 14–12 (54%) 104.4 0.00
23 2005 1726 141.2 +1.10 -0.69 0.991 50.2% -160 +87 -103 53.4% +0.33 9–6 (60%) 8–13 (38%) 102.6 -1.50 2009 1619 133.1 +3.06 -3.98 0.906 49.1% +72 — — 47.2% -0.31 1–1 6–7 (46%) — +0.12
24 2006 1652 114.7 -3.84 +0.04 0.766 45.3% -130 — — 27.8% -1.22 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.83 2010 1554 99.5 +0.96 -3.80 0.646 45.7% — — — 20.0% -1.00 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.21
25 2007 1684 130.9 +2.01 -1.85 1.073 50.8% — +100 — 45.2% -0.61 1–2 (33%) 6–2 (75%) 101.0 -0.76 2011 1585 114.2 +0.83 -1.90 0.916 49.0% +83 — — 40.0% -0.50 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.34
26 2008 1759 132.7 +1.60 -1.73 0.986 49.9% -112 +21 -132 48.6% -0.22 8–8 (50%) 16–11 (59%) 105.5 +0.07 2012 1645 118.7 -1.04 -2.78 0.781 46.6% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.03
27 2009 1707 142.8 +0.72 -0.19 1.018 50.3% -92 +118 -52 49.3% +0.07 7–9 (44%) 8–13 (38%) 97.5 +0.84 2013 1640 108.4 0.00 +0.05 2.183 61.0% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — +0.18
28 2010 1707 144.8 +1.68 -1.00 1.022 50.3% -64 +74 -20 50.8% -0.01 6–9 (40%) 13–12 (52%) 99.5 +1.47 2014 1665 108.1 +3.55 -2.62 0.557 44.2% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.14
29 2011 1688 139.6 +0.41 -0.16 1.005 49.9% -77 +67 +2 44.4% -0.26 5–10 (33%) 9–9 (50%) 99.1 -1.38 2015 1605 97.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 1618 128.5 -0.92 -2.05 0.900 48.2% -12 +62 — 33.3% -1.04 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 95.6 +0.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 1688 146.6 +0.21 -1.64 0.946 48.9% -114 +151 — 37.8% -0.70 2–6 (25%) 8–14 (36%) 93.7 -0.88 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 1735 145.7 -1.09 -0.75 0.889 48.4% -68 +108 — 43.9% -0.53 4–4 (50%) 6–5 (55%) 103.9 -1.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 1655 110.2 +1.39 -2.44 1.279 52.9% — — — 50.0% +0.25 — — — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1843 144.0 +0.61 -0.96 0.980 49.8% -93 +83 -39 46.7% -0.17 52–74 (41%) 90–107 (46%) 97.3 -0.94 — 1682 125.4 +2.90 -4.66 0.907 48.9% +44 -14 +1 40.6% -0.54 11–19 (37%) 41–41 (50%) 100.6 -0.01

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.