H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Victor Hanescu vs Guillermo Canas H2H: 0-1
Guillermo Canas holds a 1–0 lead over Victor Hanescu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Guillermo Canas leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Guillermo Canas won the 2007 Roland Garros first round 6-3 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 44
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2007* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Guillermo Canas | 6-3 6-1 6-4 | Victor Hanescu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victor Hanescu | #1,025 | #26 | 1,671 | 1,843 | 186 | 226 | 45.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Guillermo Canas | #1,110 | #8 | 2,075 | 2,008 | 244 | 188 | 56.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Victor Hanescu | Guillermo Canas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #129 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #95 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #70 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #71 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #92 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #231 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #35 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #15 | 1,840 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2006 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #646 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #15 | 1,857 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2007 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #272 | 1,805 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2008 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #50 | 1,756 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #12 | 1,898 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2009 | 26–30 | 46.4% | #48 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 22–11 | 66.7% | #102 | 1,889 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2010 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2011 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #15 | 1,821 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 2012 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #62 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #79 | 1,690 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 2013 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #191 | 1,628 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | 2014 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #122 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #279 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |