H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Victor Hanescu vs Guillermo Garcia-Lopez H2H: 1-3

Guillermo Garcia-Lopez holds a 3–1 lead over Victor Hanescu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Guillermo Garcia-Lopez leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Guillermo Garcia-Lopez won the 2013 S Hertogenbosch third round 6-4 6-3.

ROU Age 44 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1 3
4 main draw meetings
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 19, 2013* S Hertogenbosch ATP 250 R32 Grass Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #78 6-4 6-3 Victor Hanescu #47 Match data
May 22, 2009* Kitzbuhel ATP 250 QF Clay Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #74 6-2 6-2 Victor Hanescu #32 Match data
Oct 12, 2008 Madrid Masters Masters 1000 Q1 Q Hard Victor Hanescu #72 6-1 7-6(2) Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #59 Match data
Jul 18, 2008* Kitzbuhel ATP 250 R16 Clay Victor Hanescu #59 6-2 6-1 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #69 Match data
Jul 22, 2004* Umag ATP 250 R32 Clay Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #138 5-7 6-4 6-4 Victor Hanescu #85 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Victor Hanescu #1,025 #26 1,671 1,843 186 226 45.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #1,009 #23 1,465 1,938 299 353 45.9% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Victor Hanescu Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2002 3–3 50.0% #172 1,520 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #244 1,497 0 0
21 2003 13–12 52.0% #70 1,667 0 0 2004 5–7 41.7% #129 1,578 0 0
22 2004 17–23 42.5% #92 1,572 0 0 2005 19–26 42.2% #91 1,589 0 0
23 2005 25–22 53.2% #35 1,727 0 0 2006 15–20 42.9% #68 1,595 0 0
24 2006 0–6 0.0% #646 1,652 0 0 2007 13–22 37.1% #90 1,526 0 0
25 2007 7–7 50.0% #76 1,683 0 0 2008 22–22 50.0% #62 1,646 0 0
26 2008 20–21 48.8% #50 1,756 0 1 2009 28–27 50.9% #41 1,757 0 1
27 2009 26–30 46.4% #48 1,705 0 1 2010 31–23 57.4% #33 1,874 0 2
28 2010 23–24 48.9% #51 1,706 0 1 2011 20–29 40.8% #65 1,712 0 2
29 2011 16–24 40.0% #90 1,687 0 1 2012 20–25 44.4% #76 1,719 0 2
30 2012 6–13 31.6% #62 1,618 0 1 2013 20–21 48.8% #62 1,774 0 2
31 2013 18–25 41.9% #80 1,689 0 1 2014 25–26 49.0% #36 1,740 0 3
32 2014 11–15 42.3% #122 1,735 0 1 2015 32–25 56.1% #27 1,853 0 5
33 2015 1–1 50.0% #279 1,655 0 1 2016 22–31 41.5% #70 1,686 0 5
34 2017 5–15 25.0% #70 1,747 0 5
35 2018 16–23 41.0% #105 1,675 0 5
36 2019 6–10 37.5% #144 1,694 0 5