H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Victor Hanescu vs Igor Andreev H2H: 3-2

Victor Hanescu holds a 3–2 lead over Igor Andreev in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Victor Hanescu leads 3–1 on clay, while Igor Andreev leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Victor Hanescu won the 2010 Madrid Masters second round 3-6 6-5 RET.

ROU Age 44 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
RUS Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 11, 2010* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Victor Hanescu #38 3-6 6-5 (ret.) Igor Andreev #45 Match data
Aug 21, 2008* New Haven ATP 250 R16 Hard Igor Andreev #23 6-4 7-5 Victor Hanescu #58 Match data
Jul 13, 2008* Gstaad ATP 250 F Clay Victor Hanescu #80 6-3 6-4 Igor Andreev #34 Match data
Sep 17, 2005* Bucharest ATP 250 SF Clay Igor Andreev #52 4-6 7-6(2) 6-3 Victor Hanescu #45 Match data
Sep 25, 2003* Palermo ATP 250 R32 Clay Victor Hanescu #77 6-3 6-3 Igor Andreev #111 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Victor Hanescu #1,025 #26 1,671 1,843 186 226 45.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Igor Andreev #1,011 #18 2,490 1,913 219 214 50.6% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Victor Hanescu Igor Andreev
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2003 4–4 50.0% #88 1,565 0 0
20 2002 3–3 50.0% #172 1,520 0 0 2004 25–26 49.0% #50 1,660 0 0
21 2003 13–12 52.0% #70 1,667 0 0 2005 37–29 56.1% #26 1,832 0 3
22 2004 17–23 42.5% #92 1,572 0 0 2006 13–13 50.0% #91 1,760 0 3
23 2005 25–22 53.2% #35 1,727 0 0 2007 31–26 54.4% #33 1,769 0 3
24 2006 0–6 0.0% #646 1,652 0 0 2008 38–27 58.5% #19 1,882 0 3
25 2007 7–7 50.0% #76 1,683 0 0 2009 27–30 47.4% #35 1,693 0 3
26 2008 20–21 48.8% #50 1,756 0 1 2010 17–19 47.2% #79 1,700 0 3
27 2009 26–30 46.4% #48 1,705 0 1 2011 15–24 38.5% #115 1,688 0 3
28 2010 23–24 48.9% #51 1,706 0 1 2012 12–15 44.4% #110 1,684 0 3
29 2011 16–24 40.0% #90 1,687 0 1 2013 0–1 0.0% #1015 1,587 0 3
30 2012 6–13 31.6% #62 1,618 0 1
31 2013 18–25 41.9% #80 1,689 0 1
32 2014 11–15 42.3% #122 1,735 0 1
33 2015 1–1 50.0% #279 1,655 0 1