H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Victor Hanescu vs Ivan Dodig H2H: 0-1

Ivan Dodig holds a 1–0 lead over Victor Hanescu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ivan Dodig leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ivan Dodig won the 2011 Libéma Open first round 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Victor Hanescu
ROU Age 45 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Ivan Dodig
CRO Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ivan Dodig #42 6-4 7-5 Victor Hanescu #62 Match data Jun 15, 2011* R32 Libéma Open ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Victor Hanescu #1,025 #26 1,671 1,843 187 228 45.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Ivan Dodig #423 #29 1,330 1,966 115 132 46.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Victor Hanescu Ivan Dodig
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2002 3–3 50.0% #172 1,520 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2003 13–12 52.0% #70 1,667 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2004 17–24 41.5% #92 1,560 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2005 25–22 53.2% #35 1,726 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #422 1,508 0 0
24 2006 0–6 0.0% #646 1,651 0 0 2009 2–2 50.0% #180 1,546 0 0
25 2007 7–7 50.0% #76 1,683 0 0 2010 7–7 50.0% #88 1,724 0 0
26 2008 21–22 48.8% #50 1,759 0 1 2011 26–23 53.1% #36 1,776 0 1
27 2009 26–30 46.4% #48 1,706 0 1 2012 15–22 40.5% #72 1,783 0 1
28 2010 23–24 48.9% #51 1,706 0 1 2013 32–24 57.1% #33 1,918 0 1
29 2011 16–24 40.0% #90 1,687 0 1 2014 15–23 39.5% #95 1,758 0 1
30 2012 6–13 31.6% #62 1,618 0 1 2015 8–11 42.1% #87 1,668 0 1
31 2013 18–25 41.9% #80 1,688 0 1 2016 7–16 30.4% #147 1,571 0 1
32 2014 11–15 42.3% #122 1,734 0 1 2017 3–2 60.0% #336 1,607 0 1
33 2015 1–1 50.0% #279 1,655 0 1 — — — — — — —
40 — — — — — — — 2025 0–1 0.0% — 1,573 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Victor Hanescu Ivan Dodig
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 2002 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 2 3 5 40.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 4 8 12 33.3% 10 11 21 47.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 7 7 14 50.0% 16 9 25 64.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2006 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — — 2010 5 5 10 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
26 2008 10 14 24 41.7% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2011 17 14 31 54.8% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
27 2009 9 17 26 34.6% 15 11 26 57.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2012 10 12 22 45.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
28 2010 8 10 18 44.4% 13 13 26 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2013 20 16 36 55.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
29 2011 2 7 9 22.2% 13 15 28 46.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2014 11 17 28 39.3% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2012 1 4 5 20.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2015 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2013 4 14 18 22.2% 14 9 23 60.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2016 2 10 12 16.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
32 2014 4 7 11 36.4% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2017 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2015 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 52 97 149 34.9% 121 106 227 53.3% 13 19 32 40.6% 1 6 7 14.3% — 73 85 158 46.2% 25 32 57 43.9% 17 15 32 53.1% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 408/415 of Victor Hanescu's and 245/246 of Ivan Dodig's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Victor Hanescu Ivan Dodig
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2002 5/6 2.8 1.6 60.7% 63.8% 54.1% 61.2% 48.1% 59.8% 38.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 25/25 4.1 2.3 65.8% 70.6% 50.5% 63.4% 48.4% 64.0% 36.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 40/41 6.5 2.3 67.5% 69.3% 50.8% 63.0% 45.0% 63.2% 35.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 47/47 5.5 1.4 68.9% 69.0% 51.8% 70.5% 41.2% 63.4% 36.2% 2008 1/1 1.0 0.0 56.6% 70.0% 34.8% 40.0% — 54.7% 24.5%
24 2006 6/6 5.2 2.8 64.0% 60.4% 48.5% 47.6% 37.8% 56.3% 33.4% 2009 4/4 5.5 2.5 52.2% 69.3% 49.8% 56.0% 53.8% 59.6% 36.0%
25 2007 12/14 4.3 0.8 72.3% 74.1% 51.9% 69.3% 27.0% 67.9% 34.5% 2010 14/14 8.6 3.2 57.0% 73.5% 52.2% 55.5% 51.3% 64.5% 39.5%
26 2008 40/43 5.6 1.6 69.2% 71.7% 52.4% 60.3% 44.5% 65.6% 33.9% 2011 49/49 7.6 3.1 58.3% 70.5% 49.5% 58.8% 40.1% 61.9% 35.9%
27 2009 56/56 4.6 1.7 69.2% 69.7% 51.5% 62.3% 41.8% 64.0% 36.6% 2012 36/37 8.2 3.5 57.4% 72.1% 47.9% 59.4% 35.2% 61.7% 37.0%
28 2010 47/47 6.2 1.6 71.8% 71.0% 50.9% 60.8% 34.6% 65.3% 35.4% 2013 56/56 9.3 3.0 58.6% 75.1% 54.1% 61.4% 45.5% 66.5% 38.4%
29 2011 40/40 3.9 1.8 67.2% 69.6% 50.1% 47.9% 43.3% 63.3% 36.8% 2014 38/38 8.5 3.4 57.9% 74.4% 49.5% 57.5% 42.1% 63.9% 35.2%
30 2012 19/19 3.3 1.0 72.5% 65.7% 48.9% 58.7% 41.8% 61.5% 34.7% 2015 19/19 8.7 3.0 59.4% 74.5% 53.9% 57.0% 45.5% 66.3% 37.9%
31 2013 43/43 3.6 1.1 70.4% 68.7% 50.1% 56.0% 37.4% 63.3% 34.7% 2016 23/23 8.0 3.6 59.8% 69.3% 48.5% 59.3% 47.9% 60.9% 33.9%
32 2014 26/26 3.6 1.7 70.6% 67.4% 44.8% 59.5% 35.3% 60.8% 34.8% 2017 5/5 5.4 5.8 62.0% 70.2% 44.5% 53.9% 34.3% 60.7% 39.9%
33 2015 2/2 8.0 1.0 62.6% 80.9% 60.3% 80.0% 25.0% 73.0% 34.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 408/415 4.8 1.6 69.1% 69.5% 50.6% 60.6% 40.7% 63.7% 35.5% — 245/247 8.3 3.3 58.3% 72.8% 50.6% 58.8% 42.6% 63.5% 36.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Victor Hanescu Ivan Dodig
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 2002 1520 111.3 -1.52 +0.27 0.969 49.8% — +31 — 45.5% +0.18 0–1 1–0 — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 1667 132.9 +1.94 -0.77 1.011 50.6% -105 +5 -57 53.1% +0.31 2–3 (40%) 4–6 (40%) — -0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 1560 128.8 -0.24 -1.30 0.958 49.7% -32 +93 +47 46.5% -0.03 6–8 (43%) 8–15 (35%) — +0.44 2007 1495 106.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 1726 141.2 +1.10 -0.69 0.991 50.2% -160 +87 -103 53.4% +0.33 9–6 (60%) 8–13 (38%) — -1.50 2008 1509 106.8 +4.34 +3.57 0.541 40.2% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.29
24 2006 1652 114.7 -3.84 +0.04 0.766 45.3% -130 — — 27.8% -1.22 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.83 2009 1546 117.4 -1.85 +0.71 0.891 48.0% +60 — — 50.0% -0.75 — 1–0 — -0.48
25 2007 1684 130.9 +2.01 -1.85 1.073 50.8% — +100 — 45.2% -0.61 1–2 (33%) 6–2 (75%) — -0.76 2010 1724 125.3 +0.48 +1.37 1.113 52.2% +20 — — 52.9% +0.18 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.08
26 2008 1759 132.7 +1.60 -1.73 0.986 49.9% -112 +21 -132 48.6% -0.22 8–8 (50%) 16–11 (59%) — +0.07 2011 1777 150.6 -0.35 -0.75 0.941 49.0% +49 -206 -91 49.6% -0.25 12–4 (75%) 13–6 (68%) — -1.33
27 2009 1707 142.8 +0.72 -0.19 1.018 50.3% -92 +118 -52 49.3% +0.07 7–9 (44%) 8–13 (38%) — +0.84 2012 1784 142.5 -1.17 -0.16 0.965 49.4% +59 -235 -120 40.4% -0.53 8–6 (57%) 11–6 (65%) — +0.32
28 2010 1707 144.8 +1.68 -1.00 1.022 50.3% -64 +74 -20 50.8% -0.01 6–9 (40%) 13–12 (52%) — +1.47 2013 1919 160.6 +2.92 +2.62 1.146 52.4% -16 -288 -73 54.7% +0.35 8–10 (44%) 11–14 (44%) — -2.81
29 2011 1688 139.6 +0.41 -0.16 1.005 49.9% -77 +67 +2 44.4% -0.26 5–10 (33%) 9–9 (50%) — -1.38 2014 1758 150.7 -0.20 -0.49 0.977 49.6% -2 -88 — 44.6% +0.02 6–6 (50%) 7–13 (35%) — +1.01
30 2012 1618 128.5 -0.92 -2.05 0.900 48.2% -12 +62 — 33.3% -1.04 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.65 2015 1668 137.9 +1.03 +1.07 1.123 51.4% +16 -3 — 47.9% +0.08 1–4 (20%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.31
31 2013 1688 146.6 +0.21 -1.64 0.946 48.9% -114 +151 — 37.8% -0.70 2–6 (25%) 8–14 (36%) — -0.88 2016 1572 126.0 -1.95 -1.62 0.867 47.8% -29 +124 +224 40.7% -0.70 2–6 (25%) 7–4 (64%) — +0.02
32 2014 1735 145.7 -1.09 -0.75 0.889 48.4% -68 +108 — 43.9% -0.53 4–4 (50%) 6–5 (55%) — -1.73 2017 1607 117.9 -1.14 +0.70 1.014 50.1% — +110 — 53.8% -0.15 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.39
33 2015 1655 110.2 +1.39 -2.44 1.279 52.9% — — — 50.0% +0.25 — — — -0.07 2018 1593 98.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1573 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.39
Career — 1843 144.0 +0.61 -0.96 0.980 49.8% -93 +83 -39 46.7% -0.17 52–74 (41%) 90–107 (46%) 97.3 -0.94 — 1967 146.6 +0.28 +0.40 1.007 50.2% +16 -119 -48 47.8% -0.12 39–39 (50%) 56–50 (53%) 103.4 -1.03

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.