H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Victor Hanescu vs Julien Benneteau H2H: 1-2
Julien Benneteau holds a 2–1 lead over Victor Hanescu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Julien Benneteau leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Victor Hanescu leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Julien Benneteau won the 2013 Rotterdam fourth round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 44
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 44
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2013* | Rotterdam | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Julien Benneteau | 6-1 6-3 | Victor Hanescu | Match data |
| Feb 8, 2013* | Montpellier | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Julien Benneteau | 6-4 6-4 | Victor Hanescu | Match data |
| Jul 24, 2009* | Hamburg | ATP 500 | R16 | Clay | Victor Hanescu | 3-6 6-3 6-3 | Julien Benneteau | Match data |
| Oct 12, 2008 | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Victor Hanescu | 6-4 6-3 | Julien Benneteau | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victor Hanescu | #1,025 | #26 | 1,671 | 1,843 | 186 | 226 | 45.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Julien Benneteau | #140 | #25 | 1,608 | 1,955 | 269 | 292 | 48.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Victor Hanescu | Julien Benneteau | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #271 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #70 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #138 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #92 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #65 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #35 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #165 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #646 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #40 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #50 | 1,756 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #43 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 26–30 | 46.4% | #48 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #46 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2010 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #44 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2011 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,871 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2012 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #62 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #35 | 1,874 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2013 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #35 | 1,861 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2014 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #122 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #25 | 1,895 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #279 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #527 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #130 | 1,807 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #56 | 1,862 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #140 | 1,806 | 0 | 0 |