H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Victor Hanescu vs Jurgen Melzer H2H: 3-4

Jurgen Melzer holds a 4–3 lead over Victor Hanescu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Jurgen Melzer leads 2–1 on clay, while Victor Hanescu leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jurgen Melzer won the 2009 New Haven fourth round 7-6(5) 4-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Victor Hanescu
ROU Age 44 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
3 – 4
7 main draw meetings
Jurgen Melzer
AUT Age 45 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 27, 2009* New Haven ATP 250 R16 Hard Jurgen Melzer #38 7-6(5) 4-6 6-1 Victor Hanescu #29 Match data
Aug 12, 2009* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Victor Hanescu #32 6-4 6-3 Jurgen Melzer #31 Match data
Jun 18, 2008* S Hertogenbosch ATP 250 R32 Grass Jurgen Melzer #82 6-7(11) 6-2 6-4 Victor Hanescu #75 Match data
Apr 13, 2007* Houston ATP 250 R16 Clay Jurgen Melzer #28 6-4 6-2 Victor Hanescu #661 Match data
May 4, 2005* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Victor Hanescu #85 6-4 3-6 6-3 Jurgen Melzer #35 Match data
Mar 9, 2004* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R128 Hard Victor Hanescu #63 6-1 6-7(5) 6-3 Jurgen Melzer #73 Match data
Jul 20, 2002* Umag ATP 250 QF Clay Jurgen Melzer #103 6-4 6-4 Victor Hanescu #185 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Victor Hanescu #1,025 #26 1,671 1,843 186 226 45.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Jurgen Melzer #1,552 #8 3,055 2,024 326 303 51.8% 0 0 0 2 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Victor Hanescu Jurgen Melzer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1999 1–1 50.0% #491 1,518 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2000 0–3 0.0% #358 1,547 0 0
20 2002 3–3 50.0% #172 1,520 0 0 2001 1–1 50.0% #168 1,550 0 0
21 2003 13–12 52.0% #70 1,667 0 0 2002 10–9 52.6% #91 1,659 0 0
22 2004 17–23 42.5% #92 1,572 0 0 2003 11–18 37.9% #79 1,584 0 0
23 2005 25–22 53.2% #35 1,727 0 0 2004 27–22 55.1% #39 1,769 0 0
24 2006 0–6 0.0% #646 1,652 0 0 2005 24–25 49.0% #52 1,702 0 0
25 2007 7–7 50.0% #76 1,683 0 0 2006 33–25 56.9% #41 1,780 0 1
26 2008 20–21 48.8% #50 1,756 0 1 2007 21–24 46.7% #60 1,695 0 1
27 2009 26–30 46.4% #48 1,705 0 1 2008 26–23 53.1% #34 1,778 0 1
28 2010 23–24 48.9% #51 1,706 0 1 2009 35–26 57.4% #28 1,924 0 2
29 2011 16–24 40.0% #90 1,687 0 1 2010 49–25 66.2% #11 1,998 0 3
30 2012 6–13 31.6% #62 1,618 0 1 2011 20–21 48.8% #33 1,799 0 3
31 2013 18–25 41.9% #80 1,689 0 1 2012 18–22 45.0% #29 1,758 0 4
32 2014 11–15 42.3% #122 1,735 0 1 2013 25–23 52.1% #27 1,825 0 5
33 2015 1–1 50.0% #279 1,655 0 1 2014 12–19 38.7% #113 1,758 0 5
34 — — — — — — — 2015 9–11 45.0% #155 1,750 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2016 3–3 50.0% #306 1,770 0 5
36 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% #186 1,731 0 5
37 — — — — — — — 2018 1–1 50.0% #288 1,703 0 5