H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Victor Hanescu vs Jurgen Melzer H2H: 3-4

Jurgen Melzer holds a 4–3 lead over Victor Hanescu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Jurgen Melzer leads 2–1 on clay, while Victor Hanescu leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jurgen Melzer won the 2009 New Haven round of 16 7-6(5) 4-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Victor Hanescu
ROU Age 45 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
3 – 4
7 main draw meetings
Jurgen Melzer
AUT Age 45 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jurgen Melzer #38 7-6(5) 4-6 6-1 Victor Hanescu #29 Match data Aug 27, 2009* R16 New Haven ATP 250 Hard
Victor Hanescu #32 6-4 6-3 Jurgen Melzer #31 Match data Aug 12, 2009* R64 Canadian Open Masters 1000 Hard
Jurgen Melzer #82 6-7(11) 6-2 6-4 Victor Hanescu #75 Match data Jun 18, 2008* R32 Libéma Open International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass
Jurgen Melzer #28 6-4 6-2 Victor Hanescu #661 Match data Apr 13, 2007* R16 U.S. Men's Clay Court Championship International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Victor Hanescu #85 6-4 3-6 6-3 Jurgen Melzer #35 Match data May 4, 2005* R64 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay
Victor Hanescu #63 6-1 6-7(5) 6-3 Jurgen Melzer #73 Match data Mar 9, 2004* R128 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Jurgen Melzer #103 6-4 6-4 Victor Hanescu #185 Match data Jul 20, 2002* QF Croatia Open Umag ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Victor Hanescu #1,025 #26 1,671 1,843 187 228 45.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Jurgen Melzer #1,552 #8 3,055 2,017 331 307 51.9% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Victor Hanescu Jurgen Melzer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1999 1–1 50.0% #491 1,518 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2000 0–3 0.0% #358 1,547 0 0
20 2002 3–3 50.0% #172 1,520 0 0 2001 1–1 50.0% #168 1,550 0 0
21 2003 13–12 52.0% #70 1,667 0 0 2002 10–9 52.6% #91 1,660 0 0
22 2004 17–24 41.5% #92 1,560 0 0 2003 11–18 37.9% #79 1,583 0 0
23 2005 25–22 53.2% #35 1,726 0 0 2004 27–23 54.0% #39 1,759 0 0
24 2006 0–6 0.0% #646 1,651 0 0 2005 24–25 49.0% #52 1,702 0 0
25 2007 7–7 50.0% #76 1,683 0 0 2006 33–25 56.9% #41 1,774 0 1
26 2008 21–22 48.8% #50 1,759 0 1 2007 21–24 46.7% #60 1,696 0 1
27 2009 26–30 46.4% #48 1,706 0 1 2008 29–24 54.7% #34 1,800 0 1
28 2010 23–24 48.9% #51 1,706 0 1 2009 35–26 57.4% #28 1,927 0 2
29 2011 16–24 40.0% #90 1,687 0 1 2010 49–25 66.2% #11 1,985 0 3
30 2012 6–13 31.6% #62 1,618 0 1 2011 20–21 48.8% #33 1,797 0 3
31 2013 18–25 41.9% #80 1,688 0 1 2012 18–23 43.9% #29 1,755 0 4
32 2014 11–15 42.3% #122 1,734 0 1 2013 25–23 52.1% #27 1,826 0 5
33 2015 1–1 50.0% #279 1,655 0 1 2014 14–20 41.2% #113 1,757 0 5
34 — — — — — — — 2015 9–11 45.0% #155 1,750 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2016 3–3 50.0% #306 1,769 0 5
36 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% #186 1,731 0 5
37 — — — — — — — 2018 1–1 50.0% #288 1,708 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Victor Hanescu Jurgen Melzer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2002 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2001 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 2 3 5 40.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2002 3 2 5 60.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 2004 4 8 12 33.3% 10 11 21 47.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2003 2 7 9 22.2% 4 8 12 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
23 2005 7 7 14 50.0% 16 9 25 64.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2004 12 12 24 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
24 2006 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 10 14 24 41.7% 10 8 18 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — — 2006 9 11 20 45.0% 20 9 29 69.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2008 10 14 24 41.7% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2007 14 14 28 50.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2009 9 17 26 34.6% 15 11 26 57.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2008 17 15 32 53.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
28 2010 8 10 18 44.4% 13 13 26 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2009 19 15 34 55.9% 12 9 21 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
29 2011 2 7 9 22.2% 13 15 28 46.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2010 28 15 43 65.1% 17 8 25 68.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
30 2012 1 4 5 20.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 10 13 23 43.5% 8 7 15 53.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
31 2013 4 14 18 22.2% 14 9 23 60.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2012 14 16 30 46.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
32 2014 4 7 11 36.4% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2013 19 13 32 59.4% 2 8 10 20.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
33 2015 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 3 9 12 25.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 4 6 10 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 52 97 149 34.9% 121 106 227 53.3% 13 19 32 40.6% 1 6 7 14.3% — 168 168 336 50.0% 120 101 221 54.3% 38 33 71 53.5% 5 5 10 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 408/415 of Victor Hanescu's and 625/638 of Jurgen Melzer's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Victor Hanescu Jurgen Melzer
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 2/2 5.0 8.5 40.6% 59.2% 42.2% 56.1% 65.6% 49.1% 37.0%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 3/3 6.3 3.0 55.6% 64.6% 51.8% 38.5% 30.3% 59.7% 34.1%
20 2002 5/6 2.8 1.6 60.7% 63.8% 54.1% 61.2% 48.1% 59.8% 38.9% 2001 1/2 5.0 3.0 59.4% 75.4% 41.0% 60.0% 18.2% 61.5% 38.6%
21 2003 25/25 4.1 2.3 65.8% 70.6% 50.5% 63.4% 48.4% 64.0% 36.3% 2002 18/19 4.9 3.1 58.9% 72.7% 48.0% 53.1% 40.9% 62.5% 36.7%
22 2004 40/41 6.5 2.3 67.5% 69.3% 50.8% 63.0% 45.0% 63.2% 35.3% 2003 29/29 6.7 4.7 56.8% 67.4% 44.1% 58.3% 41.9% 57.1% 34.6%
23 2005 47/47 5.5 1.4 68.9% 69.0% 51.8% 70.5% 41.2% 63.4% 36.2% 2004 49/50 5.2 3.3 58.1% 72.6% 49.1% 63.9% 46.6% 62.8% 38.1%
24 2006 6/6 5.2 2.8 64.0% 60.4% 48.5% 47.6% 37.8% 56.3% 33.4% 2005 49/49 4.4 2.7 59.8% 68.4% 49.9% 58.8% 50.0% 60.8% 36.7%
25 2007 12/14 4.3 0.8 72.3% 74.1% 51.9% 69.3% 27.0% 67.9% 34.5% 2006 57/58 5.7 3.2 60.9% 69.3% 52.3% 62.2% 44.8% 62.5% 39.3%
26 2008 40/43 5.6 1.6 69.2% 71.7% 52.4% 60.3% 44.5% 65.6% 33.9% 2007 44/45 4.7 2.8 63.0% 67.4% 49.9% 58.3% 45.1% 61.2% 36.4%
27 2009 56/56 4.6 1.7 69.2% 69.7% 51.5% 62.3% 41.8% 64.0% 36.6% 2008 49/53 6.6 2.5 61.7% 71.5% 54.4% 57.6% 37.8% 65.0% 35.3%
28 2010 47/47 6.2 1.6 71.8% 71.0% 50.9% 60.8% 34.6% 65.3% 35.4% 2009 61/61 6.8 2.3 59.4% 73.4% 52.3% 58.8% 41.0% 64.9% 37.0%
29 2011 40/40 3.9 1.8 67.2% 69.6% 50.1% 47.9% 43.3% 63.3% 36.8% 2010 72/74 6.3 2.4 61.1% 72.2% 54.7% 59.9% 45.7% 65.3% 37.3%
30 2012 19/19 3.3 1.0 72.5% 65.7% 48.9% 58.7% 41.8% 61.5% 34.7% 2011 41/41 5.0 2.4 62.8% 68.9% 50.9% 51.6% 40.0% 62.1% 38.3%
31 2013 43/43 3.6 1.1 70.4% 68.7% 50.1% 56.0% 37.4% 63.3% 34.7% 2012 40/41 5.0 3.3 61.9% 69.0% 52.4% 52.4% 48.1% 62.4% 34.8%
32 2014 26/26 3.6 1.7 70.6% 67.4% 44.8% 59.5% 35.3% 60.8% 34.8% 2013 48/48 4.5 2.8 65.4% 67.2% 49.9% 56.8% 33.7% 61.1% 35.8%
33 2015 2/2 8.0 1.0 62.6% 80.9% 60.3% 80.0% 25.0% 73.0% 34.6% 2014 34/34 4.1 2.6 65.4% 67.2% 50.5% 54.5% 36.3% 61.2% 37.0%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 20/20 3.3 4.0 61.0% 67.3% 49.3% 60.5% 41.5% 60.4% 36.2%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 6/6 2.7 2.5 67.4% 66.9% 44.8% 60.6% 51.9% 59.3% 40.5%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 1/1 4.0 1.0 74.8% 56.6% 53.6% 22.2% 75.0% 55.9% 31.1%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 1/2 3.0 2.0 79.3% 72.5% 55.6% 100.0% 25.0% 69.0% 27.6%
Career — 408/415 4.8 1.6 69.1% 69.5% 50.6% 60.6% 40.7% 63.7% 35.5% — 625/638 5.4 2.9 61.2% 69.8% 51.0% 58.0% 42.8% 62.4% 36.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Victor Hanescu Jurgen Melzer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1518 108.7 -0.28 +0.62 0.727 43.2% — — — 40.0% -1.60 1–0 1–0 — -0.03
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1548 113.7 -1.47 -0.74 0.846 47.2% — — — 22.2% -1.22 0–1 0–2 — -0.26
20 2002 1520 111.3 -1.52 +0.27 0.969 49.8% — +31 — 45.5% +0.18 0–1 1–0 — +0.18 2001 1551 105.3 +1.50 -1.19 1.001 49.0% — — — 40.0% +0.20 1–0 0–3 (0%) — -0.04
21 2003 1667 132.9 +1.94 -0.77 1.011 50.6% -105 +5 -57 53.1% +0.31 2–3 (40%) 4–6 (40%) 98.4 -0.42 2002 1660 130.8 +0.42 -0.51 0.980 49.6% -48 -49 — 50.0% -0.07 2–2 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 98.0 +0.12
22 2004 1560 128.8 -0.24 -1.30 0.958 49.7% -32 +93 +47 46.5% -0.03 6–8 (43%) 8–15 (35%) 97.3 +0.44 2003 1583 111.1 -3.51 -2.06 0.807 46.5% -20 -56 +87 39.0% -0.66 8–3 (73%) 7–6 (54%) 104.3 +0.49
23 2005 1726 141.2 +1.10 -0.69 0.991 50.2% -160 +87 -103 53.4% +0.33 9–6 (60%) 8–13 (38%) 102.6 -1.50 2004 1760 142.0 +0.13 +1.60 1.023 50.6% -26 -102 -105 52.7% +0.22 8–8 (50%) 10–12 (45%) 100.0 -0.06
24 2006 1652 114.7 -3.84 +0.04 0.766 45.3% -130 — — 27.8% -1.22 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.83 2005 1702 137.8 -0.93 +0.15 0.938 49.4% -35 +36 -24 50.0% -0.11 10–12 (45%) 8–9 (47%) 96.3 -0.88
25 2007 1684 130.9 +2.01 -1.85 1.073 50.8% — +100 — 45.2% -0.61 1–2 (33%) 6–2 (75%) 101.0 -0.76 2006 1774 133.3 +0.02 +1.44 1.047 51.0% -104 +59 -110 52.9% +0.07 11–13 (46%) 13–9 (59%) 100.1 -0.50
26 2008 1759 132.7 +1.60 -1.73 0.986 49.9% -112 +21 -132 48.6% -0.22 8–8 (50%) 16–11 (59%) 105.5 +0.07 2007 1696 137.3 -1.21 +0.32 0.940 48.9% -11 +74 — 48.1% -0.22 9–7 (56%) 7–11 (39%) 95.6 +0.10
27 2009 1707 142.8 +0.72 -0.19 1.018 50.3% -92 +118 -52 49.3% +0.07 7–9 (44%) 8–13 (38%) 97.5 +0.84 2008 1800 138.7 +1.21 -0.83 1.009 50.0% -22 -35 -116 52.4% +0.11 13–8 (62%) 13–15 (46%) 104.7 +0.86
28 2010 1707 144.8 +1.68 -1.00 1.022 50.3% -64 +74 -20 50.8% -0.01 6–9 (40%) 13–12 (52%) 99.5 +1.47 2009 1927 151.7 +1.63 +0.96 1.054 50.8% -29 -86 -117 55.1% +0.14 8–8 (50%) 14–8 (64%) 105.0 -1.10
29 2011 1688 139.6 +0.41 -0.16 1.005 49.9% -77 +67 +2 44.4% -0.26 5–10 (33%) 9–9 (50%) 99.1 -1.38 2010 1986 158.2 +2.39 +1.03 1.076 51.1% -20 -6 -97 59.0% +0.57 15–7 (68%) 19–21 (48%) 104.8 +1.32
30 2012 1618 128.5 -0.92 -2.05 0.900 48.2% -12 +62 — 33.3% -1.04 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 95.6 +0.65 2011 1797 152.8 -0.17 +0.99 1.011 50.3% +17 +143 +139 52.0% +0.28 4–6 (40%) 6–7 (46%) 95.7 +1.81
31 2013 1688 146.6 +0.21 -1.64 0.946 48.9% -114 +151 — 37.8% -0.70 2–6 (25%) 8–14 (36%) 93.7 -0.88 2012 1755 145.9 -0.78 -0.89 0.925 48.7% +20 +103 +111 44.8% -0.47 9–7 (56%) 13–7 (65%) 102.7 +1.18
32 2014 1735 145.7 -1.09 -0.75 0.889 48.4% -68 +108 — 43.9% -0.53 4–4 (50%) 6–5 (55%) 103.9 -1.73 2013 1827 141.2 -1.23 -0.76 0.919 48.3% +22 -130 +72 47.5% -0.28 10–6 (63%) 8–10 (44%) 101.5 +2.36
33 2015 1655 110.2 +1.39 -2.44 1.279 52.9% — — — 50.0% +0.25 — — — -0.07 2014 1757 141.1 -1.73 +1.12 0.955 49.1% +3 -5 +127 41.2% -0.46 6–7 (46%) 7–10 (41%) 98.0 -1.34
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1750 127.3 -2.36 -0.42 0.914 48.8% +47 -54 — 44.7% -0.40 1–1 5–8 (38%) — -0.22
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1770 130.7 -0.27 +1.24 0.995 50.5% +16 -37 — 60.0% +0.13 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — -0.56
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1732 123.5 +3.00 +7.41 0.704 43.9% — — — 25.0% -1.75 — — — -0.44
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1708 119.9 -1.35 +6.34 0.890 49.7% — — — 100.0% +1.50 — 1–0 — -0.15
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1689 101.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1843 144.0 +0.61 -0.96 0.980 49.8% -93 +83 -39 46.7% -0.17 52–74 (41%) 90–107 (46%) 97.3 -0.94 — 2017 147.6 -0.10 +0.36 0.981 49.7% -14 -4 -12 50.4% -0.03 116–99 (54%) 134–143 (48%) 100.2 +0.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.