H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Victor Hanescu vs Nicolas Kiefer H2H: 0-1

Nicolas Kiefer holds a 1–0 lead over Victor Hanescu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicolas Kiefer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Kiefer won the 2004 Scottsdale semifinal 4-6 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Victor Hanescu
ROU Age 44 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Nicolas Kiefer
GER Age 49 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 6, 2004* Scottsdale ATP 250 SF Hard Nicolas Kiefer #46 4-6 7-5 6-4 Victor Hanescu #75 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Victor Hanescu #1,025 #26 1,671 1,843 186 226 45.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Nicolas Kiefer #720 #4 2,447 1,984 343 252 57.6% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Victor Hanescu Nicolas Kiefer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% #1198 1,489 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1995 3–3 50.0% #206 1,527 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1996 7–9 43.8% #128 1,562 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1997 26–16 61.9% #32 1,798 0 1
20 2002 3–3 50.0% #172 1,520 0 0 1998 31–25 55.4% #35 1,790 0 1
21 2003 13–12 52.0% #70 1,667 0 0 1999 53–21 71.6% #6 1,921 0 4
22 2004 17–23 42.5% #92 1,572 0 0 2000 30–15 66.7% #20 1,921 0 6
23 2005 25–22 53.2% #35 1,727 0 0 2001 26–25 51.0% #42 1,766 0 6
24 2006 0–6 0.0% #646 1,652 0 0 2002 19–24 44.2% #72 1,718 0 6
25 2007 7–7 50.0% #76 1,683 0 0 2003 19–17 52.8% #58 1,727 0 6
26 2008 20–21 48.8% #50 1,756 0 1 2004 32–19 62.7% #21 1,897 0 6
27 2009 26–30 46.4% #48 1,705 0 1 2005 31–22 58.5% #22 1,854 0 6
28 2010 23–24 48.9% #51 1,706 0 1 2006 14–8 63.6% #48 1,843 0 6
29 2011 16–24 40.0% #90 1,687 0 1 2007 19–12 61.3% #49 1,893 0 6
30 2012 6–13 31.6% #62 1,618 0 1 2008 20–16 55.6% #38 1,876 0 6
31 2013 18–25 41.9% #80 1,689 0 1 2009 12–16 42.9% #116 1,757 0 6
32 2014 11–15 42.3% #122 1,735 0 1 2010 1–3 25.0% #722 1,717 0 6
33 2015 1–1 50.0% #279 1,655 0 1 — — — — — — —