H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Victor Hanescu vs Paul-Henri Mathieu H2H: 0-2
Paul-Henri Mathieu holds a 2–0 lead over Victor Hanescu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Paul-Henri Mathieu leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Paul-Henri Mathieu won the 2010 Cincinnati Masters second round 6-7(6) 7-6(2) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 44
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 44
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2010* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Paul-Henri Mathieu | 6-7(6) 7-6(2) 6-3 | Victor Hanescu | Match data |
| Jan 16, 2008* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Paul-Henri Mathieu | 6-1 7-6(4) 6-2 | Victor Hanescu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victor Hanescu | #1,025 | #26 | 1,671 | 1,843 | 186 | 226 | 45.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Paul-Henri Mathieu | #914 | #12 | 2,000 | 1,961 | 268 | 297 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Victor Hanescu | Paul-Henri Mathieu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #275 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #150 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #36 | 1,838 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2003 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #70 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #83 | 1,683 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2004 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #92 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #123 | 1,661 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2005 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #35 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #46 | 1,720 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2006 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #646 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #55 | 1,668 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2007 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #25 | 1,870 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2008 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #50 | 1,756 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #31 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2009 | 26–30 | 46.4% | #48 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 28–29 | 49.1% | #33 | 1,748 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2010 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #97 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2011 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2012 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #62 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #58 | 1,822 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2013 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #129 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2014 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #122 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #96 | 1,759 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #279 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #95 | 1,761 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #73 | 1,679 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #249 | 1,574 | 0 | 4 |