H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Victor Hanescu vs Potito Starace H2H: 2-3

Potito Starace holds a 3–2 lead over Victor Hanescu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on clay, while Potito Starace leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Potito Starace won the 2011 Casablanca semifinal 6-1 6-7(3) 7-6(2).

ROU Age 44 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
ITA Age 45 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 24, 2015 Roland Garros Grand Slam Q1 Q Clay Victor Hanescu #187 6-4 4-6 6-4 Potito Starace #198 Match data
Apr 9, 2011* Casablanca ATP 250 SF Clay Potito Starace #47 6-1 6-7(3) 7-6(2) Victor Hanescu #58 Match data
Nov 3, 2010* Valencia ATP 250 R32 Hard Potito Starace #55 4-6 6-4 6-2 Victor Hanescu #51 Match data
Sep 15, 2007* Bucharest ATP 250 QF Clay Victor Hanescu #151 7-6(5) 7-5 Potito Starace #31 Match data
Sep 15, 2005* Bucharest ATP 250 R32 Clay Victor Hanescu #45 6-3 6-2 Potito Starace #107 Match data
Jul 9, 2004* Gstaad ATP 250 R16 Clay Potito Starace #145 3-6 7-6(3) 7-6(1) Victor Hanescu #85 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Victor Hanescu #1,025 #26 1,671 1,843 186 226 45.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Potito Starace #943 #27 1,138 1,789 147 188 43.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Victor Hanescu Potito Starace
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2002 3–3 50.0% #172 1,520 0 0
21 2003 13–12 52.0% #70 1,667 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #222 1,481 0 0
22 2004 17–23 42.5% #92 1,572 0 0 2004 8–9 47.1% #76 1,603 0 0
23 2005 25–22 53.2% #35 1,727 0 0 2005 13–20 39.4% #105 1,588 0 0
24 2006 0–6 0.0% #646 1,652 0 0 2006 13–17 43.3% #83 1,591 0 0
25 2007 7–7 50.0% #76 1,683 0 0 2007 25–25 50.0% #31 1,655 0 0
26 2008 20–21 48.8% #50 1,756 0 1 2008 18–21 46.2% #72 1,650 0 0
27 2009 26–30 46.4% #48 1,705 0 1 2009 15–23 39.5% #62 1,667 0 0
28 2010 23–24 48.9% #51 1,706 0 1 2010 23–25 47.9% #47 1,735 0 0
29 2011 16–24 40.0% #90 1,687 0 1 2011 22–26 45.8% #58 1,704 0 0
30 2012 6–13 31.6% #62 1,618 0 1 2012 8–18 30.8% #164 1,599 0 0
31 2013 18–25 41.9% #80 1,689 0 1 2013 1–1 50.0% #152 1,545 0 0
32 2014 11–15 42.3% #122 1,735 0 1 2014 1–2 33.3% #163 1,636 0 0
33 2015 1–1 50.0% #279 1,655 0 1