H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Victor Hanescu vs Radek Stepanek H2H: 1-3

Radek Stepanek holds a 3–1 lead over Victor Hanescu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Radek Stepanek leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Radek Stepanek won the 2010 Moscow third round 7-6(5) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Victor Hanescu
ROU Age 44 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Radek Stepanek
CZE Age 47 Right-Handed 186 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 21, 2010* Moscow ATP 250 R32 Hard Radek Stepanek #37 7-6(5) 6-3 Victor Hanescu #51 Match data
Aug 26, 2010* New Haven ATP 250 R16 Hard Radek Stepanek #30 7-6(4) 6-7(4) 6-4 Victor Hanescu #54 Match data
Apr 14, 2005* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Victor Hanescu #99 6-3 2-6 6-0 Radek Stepanek #23 Match data
Nov 4, 2004* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Carpet Radek Stepanek #63 6-4 6-1 Victor Hanescu #90 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Victor Hanescu #1,025 #26 1,671 1,843 186 226 45.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Radek Stepanek #492 #8 2,700 2,034 366 283 56.4% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Victor Hanescu Radek Stepanek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 1998 0–1 0.0% #165 1,488 0 0
20 2002 3–3 50.0% #172 1,520 0 0 1999 2–4 33.3% #169 1,501 0 0
21 2003 13–12 52.0% #70 1,667 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2004 17–23 42.5% #92 1,572 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #542 1,464 0 0
23 2005 25–22 53.2% #35 1,727 0 0 2002 17–14 54.8% #63 1,659 0 0
24 2006 0–6 0.0% #646 1,652 0 0 2003 24–22 52.2% #46 1,716 0 0
25 2007 7–7 50.0% #76 1,683 0 0 2004 28–23 54.9% #33 1,790 0 0
26 2008 20–21 48.8% #50 1,756 0 1 2005 45–26 63.4% #20 1,840 0 0
27 2009 26–30 46.4% #48 1,705 0 1 2006 30–15 66.7% #19 1,865 0 1
28 2010 23–24 48.9% #51 1,706 0 1 2007 27–21 56.2% #30 1,863 0 2
29 2011 16–24 40.0% #90 1,687 0 1 2008 31–23 57.4% #27 1,837 0 2
30 2012 6–13 31.6% #62 1,618 0 1 2009 44–19 69.8% #12 2,010 0 4
31 2013 18–25 41.9% #80 1,689 0 1 2010 17–15 53.1% #62 1,872 0 4
32 2014 11–15 42.3% #122 1,735 0 1 2011 30–24 55.6% #28 1,880 0 5
33 2015 1–1 50.0% #279 1,655 0 1 2012 21–19 52.5% #31 1,930 0 5
34 — — — — — — — 2013 14–16 46.7% #44 1,828 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2014 16–17 48.5% #68 1,801 0 5
36 — — — — — — — 2015 7–10 41.2% #197 1,766 0 5
37 — — — — — — — 2016 10–11 47.6% #107 1,866 0 5
38 — — — — — — — 2017 3–2 60.0% #354 1,900 0 5