H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Victor Hanescu vs Robin Soderling H2H: 1-2
Robin Soderling holds a 2–1 lead over Victor Hanescu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Robin Soderling leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Robin Soderling won the 2009 Shanghai Masters second round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 44
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 41
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2009* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Robin Soderling | 6-3 6-4 | Victor Hanescu | Match data |
| Feb 29, 2008* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Robin Soderling | 6-2 6-1 | Victor Hanescu | Match data |
| Mar 5, 2004* | Scottsdale | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Victor Hanescu | 6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 | Robin Soderling | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victor Hanescu | #1,025 | #26 | 1,671 | 1,843 | 186 | 226 | 45.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Robin Soderling | #195 | #4 | 6,055 | 2,172 | 285 | 166 | 63.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Victor Hanescu | Robin Soderling | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #444 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #163 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #60 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #34 | 1,824 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2002 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #77 | 1,737 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2003 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #70 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,823 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2004 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #92 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #41 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2005 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #35 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #17 | 1,959 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2006 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #646 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #8 | 2,070 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2007 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 53–22 | 70.7% | #5 | 2,118 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2008 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #50 | 1,756 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 34–9 | 79.1% | #13 | 2,127 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 2009 | 26–30 | 46.4% | #48 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2010 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2011 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2012 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #62 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2013 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2014 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #122 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #279 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |