H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Victor Hanescu vs Sargis Sargsian H2H: 1-0
Victor Hanescu holds a 1–0 lead over Sargis Sargsian in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Victor Hanescu leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Victor Hanescu won the 2003 Roland Garros second round 6-3 7-5 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 44
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ARM
Age 53
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2003* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Victor Hanescu | 6-3 7-5 3-6 6-2 | Sargis Sargsian | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victor Hanescu | #1,025 | #26 | 1,671 | 1,843 | 186 | 226 | 45.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Sargis Sargsian | #1,525 | #38 | 978 | 1,811 | 155 | 205 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Victor Hanescu | Sargis Sargsian | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2002 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #615 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #70 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2004 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #92 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #220 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #35 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #104 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #646 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #69 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2007 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #98 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2008 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #50 | 1,756 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #59 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2009 | 26–30 | 46.4% | #48 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #94 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2010 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2011 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #103 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2012 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #62 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #39 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2013 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #75 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2014 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #122 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #294 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #279 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #809 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |