H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Victor Hanescu vs Sergiy Stakhovsky H2H: 0-1
Sergiy Stakhovsky holds a 1–0 lead over Victor Hanescu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sergiy Stakhovsky leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sergiy Stakhovsky won the 2011 Rome Masters second round 6-3 1-6 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 44
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
UKR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2014 | Rotterdam | ATP 500 | Q2 | Hard | Sergiy Stakhovsky | 7-6(2) 6-4 | Victor Hanescu | Match data |
| May 10, 2011* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Sergiy Stakhovsky | 6-3 1-6 7-6(6) | Victor Hanescu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victor Hanescu | #1,025 | #26 | 1,671 | 1,843 | 186 | 226 | 45.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Sergiy Stakhovsky | #678 | #31 | 1,263 | 1,839 | 145 | 195 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Victor Hanescu | Sergiy Stakhovsky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2002 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #335 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #70 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #92 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #35 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #646 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #92 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,750 | 0 | 2 |
| 2008 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #50 | 1,756 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,743 | 0 | 4 |
| 2009 | 26–30 | 46.4% | #48 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 |
| 2010 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 |
| 2011 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,679 | 0 | 4 |
| 2012 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #62 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #58 | 1,686 | 0 | 4 |
| 2013 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #62 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| 2014 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #122 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |
| 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #279 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #134 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,530 | 0 | 4 |