H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Victor Pecci vs Ray Ruffels H2H: 0-1
Ray Ruffels holds a 1–0 lead over Victor Pecci in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ray Ruffels leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ray Ruffels won the 1976 La Costa fourth round 7-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PAR
Age 70
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 80
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 1976* | La Costa | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Ray Ruffels | 7-6 7-6 | Victor Pecci | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victor Pecci | #666 | #9 | 0 | 2,085 | 354 | 244 | 59.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Ray Ruffels | #482 | #27 | 0 | 1,903 | 246 | 207 | 54.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Victor Pecci | Ray Ruffels | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1974 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #318 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1975 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1976 | 46–29 | 61.3% | #34 | 1,813 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1977 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #39 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1978 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #46 | 1,874 | 0 | 3 | 1968 | 41–19 | 68.3% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1979 | 56–19 | 74.7% | #11 | 1,991 | 0 | 6 | 1969 | 35–21 | 62.5% | — | 1,760 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1980 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #29 | 1,837 | 0 | 7 | 1970 | 35–22 | 61.4% | — | 1,781 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1981 | 48–20 | 70.6% | #16 | 1,820 | 0 | 9 | 1971 | 32–32 | 50.0% | — | 1,808 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1982 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,699 | 0 | 9 | 1972 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1983 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #56 | 1,703 | 0 | 10 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,773 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1984 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #38 | 1,774 | 0 | 10 | 1974 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #76 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1985 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #110 | 1,607 | 0 | 10 | 1975 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #112 | 1,692 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 1986 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #140 | 1,577 | 0 | 10 | 1976 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #27 | 1,782 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 1987 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #256 | 1,545 | 0 | 10 | 1977 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #96 | 1,699 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,617 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #480 | 1,544 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #482 | 1,539 | 0 | 5 |