H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Yasutaka Uchiyama vs Tennys Sandgren H2H: 0-1
Tennys Sandgren holds a 1–0 lead over Yasutaka Uchiyama in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tennys Sandgren leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tennys Sandgren won the 2019 Wimbledon first round 3-6 6-2 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Japan
Age 33
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 34
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2019* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Tennys Sandgren | 3-6 6-2 6-4 6-3 | Yasutaka Uchiyama | Match data |
| Jan 18, 2016 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Q1 | Hard | Tennys Sandgren | 6-1 6-3 | Yasutaka Uchiyama | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yasutaka Uchiyama | #336 | #78 | 735 | 1,664 | 11 | 25 | 30.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tennys Sandgren | #1,243 | #41 | 1,091 | 1,870 | 47 | 75 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yasutaka Uchiyama | Tennys Sandgren | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #251 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2017 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #221 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #96 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #81 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #61 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2020 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #104 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #68 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2021 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #203 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #49 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #320 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #96 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,675 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2024 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #146 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #506 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |