H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Yen-Hsun Lu vs Victor Hanescu H2H: 0-1
Victor Hanescu holds a 1–0 lead over Yen-Hsun Lu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Victor Hanescu leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Victor Hanescu won the 2008 Memphis third round 6-3 2-1 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TPE
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 44
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2008* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Victor Hanescu | 6-3 2-1 (ret.) | Yen-Hsun Lu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yen-Hsun Lu | #991 | #33 | 1,244 | 1,855 | 143 | 222 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Victor Hanescu | #1,025 | #26 | 1,671 | 1,843 | 186 | 226 | 45.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Yen-Hsun Lu | Victor Hanescu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #87 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #158 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #70 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #89 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #92 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #110 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #35 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #64 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #646 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #98 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #35 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #50 | 1,756 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #82 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 26–30 | 46.4% | #48 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #59 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #38 | 1,798 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #62 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #77 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #122 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #71 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #279 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1008 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #568 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |