H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Yuki Bhambri vs Ruben Bemelmans H2H: 0-1
Ruben Bemelmans holds a 1–0 lead over Yuki Bhambri in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ruben Bemelmans leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ruben Bemelmans won the 2018 Roland Garros first round 6-4 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
IND
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 38
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2018* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Ruben Bemelmans | 6-4 6-4 6-1 | Yuki Bhambri | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yuki Bhambri | #1,185 | #83 | 688 | 1,747 | 15 | 26 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ruben Bemelmans | #1,092 | #84 | 628 | 1,755 | 23 | 49 | 31.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yuki Bhambri | Ruben Bemelmans | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #335 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #505 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #345 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #217 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2014 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #249 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #93 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #178 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #532 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #160 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #116 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #111 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #137 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #148 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #108 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1048 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2022 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #551 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #117 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #260 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2025 | 1–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |