H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Zhizhen Zhang vs Henri Laaksonen H2H: 0-1
Henri Laaksonen holds a 1–0 lead over Zhizhen Zhang in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Henri Laaksonen leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Henri Laaksonen won the 2017 Shenzhen quarterfinal 6-4 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
China
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2017* | Shenzhen | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Henri Laaksonen | 6-4 3-6 6-2 | Zhizhen Zhang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhizhen Zhang | #156 | #31 | 1,351 | 1,842 | 57 | 74 | 43.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Henri Laaksonen | #1,622 | #84 | 798 | 1,830 | 37 | 64 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Zhizhen Zhang | Henri Laaksonen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #413 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #291 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #342 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #244 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #360 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #318 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #321 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #99 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #169 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #45 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #104 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 2025 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #410 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #134 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #98 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #172 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |